Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T05:05:05.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Ratched-McMurphy Model Revisited: A Critique of Participatory Development Models, Strategies, and Projects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2021

Sheldon Gellar
Get access

Extract

In recent years, development theorists, planners, and practitioners have placed much greater stress on the crucial importance of popular participation in promoting rural development. Twenty years ago it was fashionable to talk about national planning; today it is fashionable to talk about participatory development. As in the past, the wealthy, the well-educated, and the professionals define the contents of participatory development and how it should be applied to and by the rural masses. Socialist theorists attack the bourgeois state and pontificate on the transition to socialism; the capitalists denounce state intervention and invoke the magic of the market; the peasants look toward the sky and pray for rain; and the cows amble in search of grass unaware of their crucial role in the participatory development process.

Type
Focus: The Politics of Food
Information
African Issues , Volume 14 , 1985 , pp. 25 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 1985 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIHR, Alain and Heinrich, Jean-Marie. La Néo-Democratie ou le capitalisme autogéré. Paris: Le Sycomore, 1979.Google Scholar
Bugnicourt, Jacques. “L’Administration rurale en Afrique peut-elle devenir l’instrument d’un véritable développement?” Revue Francaise d’Administration Publique, Vol. 11 (juillet-septembre 1979), 113–147).Google Scholar
Colin, Roland. “L’Autogestion a-t-elle un sens pour l’Afrique?”, Autogestion et Socialisme, No. 39 (Septembre 1977), 83–104.Google Scholar
DIA, Mamadou et al. Internationale Africaine des Forces pour le Développe-ment: assemblée générale constitutive du 13 avril 1975. Dakar: Grande Imprimerie Africaine, 1975.Google Scholar
DIOP, Abdoulaye. “Une Expérience Associative du Foyer des Jeunes de Ronkh à l’Amicale Economique du Walo,” Archives de Sciences Sociales de la Coopération et du Développement, No. 62 (Octobre-Decembre 1982), 108–127.Google Scholar
Galtung, Johan, O’Brien, Peter, and Preiswerk, Roy (Eds.) Self-Reliance: a Strategy for Development. London: Bogle-L’Ouverture Publications Ltd., 1980.Google Scholar
Gellar, Sheldon. Development By and For the People: A Select Annotated Bibliographical Guide to Participatory Development Issues. Paris: Club du Sahel, 1982.Google Scholar
Gellar, Sheldon. “Nurse Ratched, R.P. McMurphy and the International Economic Order: Reflections on One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest,” Social Development Issues, Vol.3 (Spring 1979), 81–87.Google Scholar
Hatch, John K. “Peasants Who Write a Textbook on Subsistence Farming: Report on the Bolivian Traditional Practices Project,” Rural Development Participation Review, Vol.2, No.2 (Winter 1981), 17–20.Google Scholar
Lecomte, Bernard. “Participation paysanne á l’aménagement et techniques des projets,” Revue Tiers-Monde, Vol. 19, No.73 (Janvier-Mars 1978), 93–108.Google Scholar
Nyerere, Julius. Ujamaa: Essays on African Socialism. London: Oxford University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Pearse, Andrew and Steifel, Matthias. Inquiry into Participation — A Research Approach. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development. May, 1979.Google Scholar
Russell, Clifford S. and Nicholson, Norman K. (Eds.) Public Choice and Rural Development. Washington,D.C.: Resources for the Future, 1981.Google Scholar
Uphoff, Norman T. Cohen, John M. and Goldsmith, Arthur A. Feasibility and Application of Rural Development Participation: A State-of-the-Art Paper. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Rural Development Committee, January 1979.Google Scholar
World Bank. Accelerated Development in Subsanaran Africa: An Agenda for Action. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank, 1981.Google Scholar