Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T06:00:35.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Parenté et Mariage chez les Dogon (Soudan Français)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 August 2012

Extract

La structure sociale des Dogon a fait l'objet d'enquêtes consignées, depuis 1931, dans un certain nombre d'ouvrages. Cette population observe dans le cadre de la famille indivise une filiation patrilinéaire et patrilocale, le totem étant hérité en ligne agnatique. Abstraction faite des manages avec les gens de caste (forgerons, griots, travailleurs du bois, du cuir), strictement prohibes, les Dogon pratiquent, au sein des quatre grandes tribus ou groupes qui les composent, l'échange généralisé.

Une synthèse des renseignements recueillis a été effectuée par M. D. Tait qui a procédé à ‘une analyse structurale des matériaux’ et conclu à la nécessité, pour comprendre les problèmes de la structure dogon, d'une ‘investigation plus poussée’.

Résumé

KINSHIP AND MARRIAGE AMONG THE DOGON OF THE FRENCH SUDAN

This article analyses the existing social organization of the Dogon tribes with reference to their mythology and cosmology; the relation between the genealogies of the mythical ancestors and the various aspects of social organization—kinship, marriage, land use, ritual activities—is clearly worked out by and known to the heads of kinship groups and other initiates, from whom the author derived the information and the analysis presented here. An account is given of the Dogon myth of creation which describes the first ordering of the habitable earth, its settlement by the mythical ancestors, the disorder and consequent impurity introduced by the activities of Yourougou (the fox) and the remedial action taken by the Nommo (son of God) who was sacrificed and revived, and through whom the earth was purified and man received the eight cereal grains which were to provide, not only his material nourishment but bis spiritual sustenance and the ingredients of his personality.

From the marriages of the four mythical ancestors sprang the four original lineages, which corresponded to the four elements and the four cardinal points, and among which the rights to cultivable land and its usufruct were distributed according to a determined order. From these four lineages are derived the four main tribes of the Dogon. The marriages of the ancestors and their descendants through five generations are presented in a genealogical table (Fig. 1) which displays all the types of marriage which are contracted by the Dogon today. These are discussed in detail and the author shows how they serve to regulate actual marriages among the Dogon, and how rights in land and the social and ritual functions of individuals and groups are determined with reference to events in the lives of the five generations of mythical ancestors.

An understanding of the Dogon conception of the constituents of the human personality and the links between an individual and his ancestors, is essential to a comprehension of the kinship and marriage systems. The personality of an individual is established in its social context by the giving of special names which are conferred at different stages in the life cycle. These names, which bring into being successively the different elements of the personality (soul, body, life-force and the contents of the clavicles) are determined for each individual by the circumstances of his birth and his place in the genealogy of his family. A fundamental concept concerning the human personality, which is influential in the choice of marriage partners, is that of the eight cereal grains which are thought to be lodged in the clavicles of every human being and are a vital element in his character; they are distributed in one order in males and in another order in females, being inherited through the paternal and maternal lines respectively. In any marriage an appropriate combination of these sets of grains must be sought. Another factor which is found in the myths and is operative in regard to marriages, is the concept of ‘twinness’; the ideal birth is a twin birth, and the ideal marriage is one in which each partner is one of twins, because the chance of the birth of twins to the partners is thereby increased.

The organization of the family and kinship group, the position and functions of the head of the family (ginna baṇa), as well as the distribution and cultivation of land (which is closely linked with the marriage system), are similarly referred to the mythical ancestors. Originally there was one family group consisting of four brothers and their wives inhabiting one dwelling (ginna). In course of time these groups subdivided into smaller units (tire togu). At the same time, several groups could be united by the practice of the same cult known as Binou (the cult of the slain and risen Nommo). In the fifth generation of ancestors the original Binou had divided into 22, each with its own name, priest, and taboos. Today, a group which venerates the same Binou constitutes a clan; a clan includes a number of ginna and may be territorially dispersed. At the tribal level, the chiefs of the four tribes represent the four original ancestors. The chiefs (Hogon) of two tribes (Dyon and Ono) are the senior men of their tribes; those of Arou and Dommo are elected from among the young men of each territorial division. Each chief is assisted by a council, the number of councillors corresponding to the number of mythical ancestors in the third generation.

A description of the puberty and marriage rituals practised by the Dogon today shows how the various elements of the myth are reproduced in symbolic actions: in sacrifices offered at the family and ancestral shrines of the bride and groom, in gifts made and services rendered by the bridegroom, in the eating of dishes made from the eight cereal grains, in the installation of the wife in her husband's household. Other seasonal rituals express other features of the myth.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

INDEX ALPHABÉTIQUE DES AUTEURS CITÉS

Dieterlen, G.Les Âmes des Dogons. Travaux et Mémoires de l'Institut d'Ethnologie, Paris, T. xl, 1941.Google Scholar
Dieterlen, G.Mécanisme de l'impureté chez les Dogon’, Journal de la Société des Africanistes, xvii, 1947, pp. 8190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dieterlen, G.Les correspondances cosmo-biologiques chez les Soudanais’, Journal de psychologie normale et pathologique, juil.-sept. 1950, pp. 350–66.Google Scholar
Dieterlen, G.Essai sur la religion bambara, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 1951.Google Scholar
Dieterlen, G.Les rites symboliques du mariage chez les Bambara’, Zaïre, viii. 8, 1954, pp. 815–41.Google Scholar
de Ganay, S.Les devises des Dogons. Travaux et Mémoires de l'Institut d'Ethnologie, Paris, T. xli, 1941.Google Scholar
Griaule, M.Masques Dogons. Travaux et Mémoires de l'Institut d'Ethnologie, T. xxiii, 1938.Google Scholar
Griaule, M.Dieu d'eau, Paris, Éditions du Chêne, 1948.Google Scholar
Griaule, M.L'alliance cathartique’, Africa, xviii. 4, 1948, pp. 242–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griaule, M.Le savoir des Dogon’, Journal de la Société des Africanistes, xxii. 1/2, 1952, pp. 2742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griaule, M.Remarques sur l'oncle utérin au Soudan’, Cahiers internationaux de Sociologie, xvi, 1954, pp. 3549.Google Scholar
Griaule, M.Rôle du silure Clarias senegalensis dans la procréation au Soudan français’, Afrikanistische Studien, 1955, pp. 299311.Google Scholar
Griaule, M. et Dieterlen, G.L'agriculture rituelle des Bozo’, Journal de la Société des Africanistes, xix. 2, 1949.Google Scholar
Griaule, M. ‘The Dogon’, African Worlds, London, O.U.P., 1954.Google Scholar
Leiris, M.La langue secrète des Dogons de Sanga. Travaux et Mémoires de l'Institut d'Ethnologie, Paris, T. 1, 1948.Google Scholar
Lifchitz, D.Les formules propitiatoires chez les Dogon des falaises de Bandiagara’, I.S.A., viii. 1, 1939, pp. 3555.Google Scholar
Lifchitz, D. et Paulme, D.Les noms individuels chez les Dogon, Mém. IFAN, xiii, 1953, pp. 307–57.Google Scholar
Paulme, D.Organisation sociale des Dogon, Paris, Domat Montchrestien, 1940.Google Scholar
Tait, D.An analytical commentary on the social structure of the Dogon’, Africa, xx. 3, 1950, pp. 175–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zahan, D.Aperçu sur la pensée théogonique des Dogon’, Cahiers internationaux de Sociologie, vi, 1949, pp. 113–33.Google Scholar