Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-31T14:52:51.104Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Divorce in Abutia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2011

Michel Verdon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Like most southern Ghanian populations, the Abutia Ewe – one of the numerous ‘village leagues’ which compose the northern part of Eweland (Volta region)– have experienced far-reaching transformations in the last century, and nowhere more radically than in their matrimonial practices. In this article, I wish to concentrate on two aspects of these practices, namely the definition of marriage and the incidence of divorce.

Indeed, an adequate analysis of divorce requires some heuristic tools which enable us to decide whether particular couples are ‘married’ or not, a procedure made extremely difficult in the case of Abutia because of the changes in their definition of marriage. In the first part of the article, I shall briefly survey these changes and discuss the definitional problems they raise and, in the second, present the main findings of a quantitative survey which helps to measure the impact of the changes discussed. It also reveals that divorce was in fact common before 1890, when German colonial rule was imposed. In the third and last part I seek to explain this marital instability in ‘pre-colonial’ Abutia.

Résumé

Le divorce chez les Abutias

Beaucoup de sociétés africaines ont subi des transformations profondes dans leurs pratiques matrimoniales, mais peu semblent avoir connu des transformations aussi dramatiques que celles que l'on observe chez les Abutias. Le mariage traditionnel n'existe plus, et toutes les alliances commencent comme de simples liaisons amoureuses secrètes. Cet état de chose pose de sérieuses questions à propos d'une definition anthropologique du mariage: à un niveau plus empirique, il s'ensuit que les couples se séparent aussi facilement qu'ils se créent. Les taux de divorce actuels parlent d'eux-mêmes, et une analyse diachronique révèle une hausse très importante de ces taux dans les cent dernières années. Cette même analyse révèle aussi que le divorce se pratiquait avec une certaine fréquence avant même l'intervention colonisatrice. L'alphabétisation, les migrations vers les villes et la résidence duolocale n'ont fait qu'aggraver des traits déjà présents il y a cent ans. Comment done expliquer cet état de chose? On trouve une réponse, non dans le type d'unifiliation ou de transactions matrimoniales, mais dans le pouvoir de marchandage dont jouissaient les femmes abutias d'autrefois, et dont elles jouissent encore.

Type
Sex, marriage, children and divorce
Information
Africa , Volume 52 , Issue 4 , October 1982 , pp. 48 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnes, John Arundel. 1967. ‘The frequency of divorce’, in Epstein, A. L. (ed.), The Craftof Social Anthropology. London: Tavistock, 47–101.Google Scholar
Bledsoe, Caroline H. 1980. Women and Marriage in Kpelle Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bohannan, Laura. 1949. ‘Dahomean marriage: a re-evaluation’, Africa 19.Google Scholar
Coale, Ansley J., and Demeny, Paul.1966. Regional Model Life Tables and Stable Populations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Ronald. 1961. ‘Marriage instability among the Kanuri of northern Nigeria’, American Anthropologist 63, 1231–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Ronald. 1971. Dominance and Defiance. Washington, D.C.: American Anthropological Association.Google Scholar
Fallers, Lloyd A. 1957. ‘Some determinants of marriage stability in Busoga: a reformulation of Gluckman's hypothesis’, Africa 27, 106–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gluckman, Max. 1950. ‘Kinship and marriage among the Lozi of northern Rhodesia and the Zulu of Natal’, in Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. and Forde, D. (eds.), African Systems ofKinship and Marriage. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goody, Esther. 1969. Contexts of Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goody, Esther 1972. ‘Conjugal separation and divorce among the Gonja of Northern Ghana’, in Fortes, M. (ed.), Marriage in Tribal Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goody, Jack and Esther, . 1966. ‘Cross-cousin marriage in Ghana’, Man (N.S.) 1, 340–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, Sir Edmund. 1957. ‘Aspects of bridewealth and marriage stability among the Kachin and Lakher’, reprinted in Leach, E. R., Rethinking Anthropology (1961). London: Athlone Press, 1–27.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J. C. 1961. ‘Social change and the stability of African marriage in northern Rhodesia’, in Southall, A. (ed.), Change in Modern Africa. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Potash, Betty. 1978. ‘Some aspects of marital stability in a rural Luo community’, Africa 48, 380–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. 1950. ‘Introduction’, in Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. and D., Forde (eds.), African Systems of Kinship and Marriage. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Richards, Audrey. 1950. ‘Some types of family structure among the Central Bantu’, in Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. and Forde, D. (eds.), African Systems of Kinship and Marriage. London: Oxford University Press, 207–51.Google Scholar
Schneider, David M. 1953. ‘A note on bridewealth and the stability of marriage’, Man 53, 55–7.Google Scholar
Stenning, D. 1959. Savannah Nomads. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Michel, Verdon. 1979. ‘Sleeping together: the dynamics of residence among the Abutia Ewe’, Journal of Anthropological Research 35, 401–25.Google Scholar
Verdon, Michel 1980. ‘From the social to the symbolic equation: the progress of idealism in contemporary anthropological representations of kinship, marriage and the family’, Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 17, 315–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdon, Michel 1981a. ‘Kinship, marriage and the family: an operational approach’, American Journal of Sociology 86, 796–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdon, Michel 1981b. ‘Agnatic descent and endogamy: a note’, Journal of Anthropological Research 37(3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdon, Michel 1982a. ‘Of mathematics and comparison: the Pende and Abutia marriages’, L'Homme, 22, 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdon, Michel 1982b. ‘The operational approach is as new as non-teleological definitions’, American Journal of Sociology, forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar