Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-fb4gq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T07:46:06.295Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Limitations of the Sonic Area Rule

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2016

L. M. Sheppard
L. M. Sheppard*
Affiliation:
Weapons Research Establishment, South Australia
Get access

Summary

Recent free flight tests have provided information on the applicability of the sonic area rule to non-lifting configurations. An analysis of results for the sonic wave drag of swept-back, tapered wings has suggested that the sonic area rule is applicable to thin wing and slender body combinations provided that the product of the wing span/length ratio and the cube root of the thickness /chord ratio is less than unity. The wing span/length ratio was found to be a much more useful slenderness parameter than the aspect ratio.

When the wing has a round-nosed section, theoretical considerations predict the existence of a so-called leading edge drag force varying with Mach number. One would expect such a wing to have the same sonic drag-rise as the equivalent body with an identical cross-sectional area distribution. Some test results do not confirm this drag-rise equivalence. It appears that the transonic drag-rise of the leading edge force is much greater than that predicted by theory.

Tests on one basic wing-body combination, with different body cross-sectional shapes of the same area, suggest that the cross-sectional shape, of a smooth slender body, has no influence on the transonic wave drag of a configuration.

Type
Research Article
Information
Aeronautical Quarterly , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , August 1960 , pp. 248 - 254
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society. 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Whitcomb, R. T. A Study of the Zero-Lift Drag-Rise Characteristics of Wing-Body Combinations near the Speed of Sound. N.A.C.A. Report 1273, 1956.Google Scholar
2. Lord, W. T. Notes on the Drag of Wing-Body Combinations at Transonic and Super sonic Speeds. R.A.E. Technical Note Aero 2229, January 1953. (See also R. & M. to be issued and R.A.E. Technical Note Aero 2282, 1954.)Google Scholar
3. Spreiter, J. R. On the Range of Applicability of the Transonic Area Rule. N.A.C.A. T.N. 3673, May 1956.Google Scholar
4. Page, W. A. Experimental Determination of the Range of Applicability of the Transonic Area Rule for Wings of Triangular Plan Form. N.A.C.A. T.N. 3872, December 1956.Google Scholar
5. Sheppard, L. M. Some Free Flight Tests on the Sonic Area Rule and Wing-Body Wave Drag. W.R.E. Technical Note HSA 51, June 1959.Google Scholar
6. Sheppard, L. M. Transonic Drag Tests of 32 Wings having R.A.E. 104 sections. W.R.E. Report HSA 12, October 1959.Google Scholar
7. Sheppard, L. M. Experimental Evidence on the Transonic and Supersonic Similarity Laws for the Wave Drag of Non-Lifting Wings. W.R.E. Technical Note HSA 54, November 1959.Google Scholar
8. Jones, R. T. Leading Edge Singularities in Thin Airfoil Theory. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, Vol. 17, May 1950.Google Scholar