Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-08T16:10:37.484Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Unsteady aerodynamic effects of trailing edge controls on delta wings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

D. J. Pilkington
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Bath, Bath, UK
N. J. Wood
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Bath, Bath, UK

Abstract

Effective control of combat aircraft at high angles of attack requires the flight control system to operate to higher frequencies and gains. This increases the possibility of excitation of the structural modes by altering the aeroservoelastic stability of the complete system. This paper details the results of tests carried out on a rigid, 55° leading edge sweep delta wing, half model fitted with a half span elevon operated through a closed loop control system. The effects of steady elevon deflections up to 40° angle of attack are described. The unsteady pressures resulting from elevon oscillations at frequency parameters up to a value equivalent to the first wing bending mode of a typical combat aircraft have been measured. The effect of the elevon oscillation on the elevon itself and on the bending mode have been estimated by calculating the unsteady hinge and root bending moments about the wing root. The lower surface, unsteady elevon effects were found to be independent of incidence and frequency parameter. The amplitude of response of the weak vortex on the upper surface of the wing reduced rapidly with frequency parameter. Above an incidence of 10°, the vortex breakdown was above the wing and led to a further reduction in the vortex response. The vortex response lagged the elevon motion.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1995 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Postgraduate researcher

* *

Senior lecturer

References

1. Caldwell, B. Structural coupling, AGARD Conference on Active Control Technologies, May 1994, to be published.Google Scholar
2. Ross, A.J. Control derivatives, AGARD LS-114, May 1981.Google Scholar
3. Orlik-rückemann, K.J. Unsteady aerodynamics and dynamic stability at high angles of attack, Lecture 8, AGARD LS 121, December 1982.Google Scholar
4. Lang, J.D. and Francis, M.S. Unsteady aerodynamics and dynamic aircraft manoeuvrability, Paper 29, AGARD CP 386, November 1985.Google Scholar
5. Williams, W.G. and Lockenour, J.L. Stability and control status for, current fighters, Chapter 5, AGARD AR 82.Google Scholar
6. Kelly, T. Private communication on results of comparison between Davies code and tests conducted in the University of Bath 30 inch open working section tunnel, 1993.Google Scholar
7. Mabey, D.G., Mcowat, D.M. and Welsh, B.L. Aerodynamic characteristics of moving trailing-edge controls at subsonic and transonic speeds, Paper 20, AGARD CP 262, 1979.Google Scholar
8. Bergh, H., and Tijdeman, H. Theoretical and Experimental Results for the Dynamic Response of Pressure Measuring Systems, NLR Report No. F238, 1965.Google Scholar
9. Bergh, H. and Tijdeman, H. The influence of main flow on the transfer function of tube-transducer systems used for unsteady pressure measurements, NLR Report No. mp 72023u, 1972.Google Scholar
10. Visser, K.D. and Washburn, A.E. Transition behaviour on flat plate delta wings, AIAA-94-1850-CP, 12th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Colorado Springs, June 20-22, 1994.Google Scholar
11. Greenwell, D.I. and Wood, N.J. Determination of vortex burst location on delta wings from surface pressure measurements, AIAA J, November 1992, 30, (11), p 2736.Google Scholar