Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T01:49:33.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A technique for predicting pilot model parameters using inverse simulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

G. R. Leacock
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
D. G. Thomson
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK

Abstract

The practice of using mathematical models to simulate pilot behaviour in one–axis stabilisation tasks is a well–known conventional simulation problem. In this paper an accepted mathematical model of a pilot is used as the controller of a rudimentary helicopter model. Flight test manoeuvre data from inverse simulation runs is used to provide time–histories which represent input forcing functions to the pilot–helicopter system, and a constrained optimisation routine is utilised to obtain values for the pilot gain and lead/lag equalisation parameters. It will be shown that as the theoretical pilot is required to ‘fly’ different manoeuvres, or indeed if the level of manoeuvre aggression is varied, the ‘pilot’ adjusts these parameters to perform a tracking task in compensatory control. The paper considers initially the pilot and helicopter models and subsequently analyses the whole system, illustrating how the pilot model changes with different situations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2001 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Mcruer, D.T. and Graham, D. Pilot–vehicle control system analysis, 1963, AIAA Guidance and Control Conference, Cambridge, Mass, 12-14 August, 1963.Google Scholar
2. Gerlach, O.H. Developments in mathematical models of human pilot behaviour, Aeronaut J, 1977, 81, (775), pp 293-305.Google Scholar
3. Innocenti, M. and Minciotti, R.L. Pilot modelling techniques for the analysis of aircraft linear dynamic behaviour, Aeronaut J, May 1990 94, (931) pp 153164.Google Scholar
4. Thomson, D.G. and Bradley, R. Development and verification of an algorithm for helicopter inverse simulation, Vertica, 1990, 14, (2).Google Scholar
5. Thomson, D.G. and Bradley, R. The principles and practical applications of helicopter inverse simulation, Simulation: Practice and Theory Int J Fed European Simulation Societies, 1998, (6).Google Scholar
6. ANON Aeronautical Design Standard, (ADS 33D): Handling qualities for military rotorcraft, July 1994, US Army and Troop Command.Google Scholar
7. Thomson, D.G. and Bradley, R. The use of inverse simulation for preliminary assessment of helicopter handling qualities, Aeronaut J, Aug/Sept, 1997, 101, (1007), pp 287294.Google Scholar
8. Mcruer, D.T. and Krendel, E.S. Mathematical models of human pilot behaviour, Ardograph, 1974, (188).Google Scholar
9. Mcruer, D.T., Graham, D. and Krendel, E.S. Manual control of single loop systems, J Franklin Institute, 1967, 283 (182) pp 129, 145-68.Google Scholar
10. Pausder, H.J. and Jordan, D. Handling qualities evaluation of helicopters with different stability and control characteristics, Vertica, 1976, l, pp 125–34.Google Scholar
11. Padfield, D.G. Helicopter Flight Dynamics: The Theory and Application of Flying Qualities and Simulation Modelling, 1995, Blackwell Science, Cambridge.Google Scholar
12. Thomson, D.G. and Bradley, R. Mathematical definition of helicopter manoeuvres, Oct 1997, J Ameri Heli Soc, 42, (4).Google Scholar
13. Celi, R. Optimisation-based inverse simulation of a helicopter slalom manoeuvre, Sep 1999, Paper H12, 25th European Rotorcraft Forum, Rome.Google Scholar
14. Grace, A. Optimisation Toolbox for use with Matlab. User's Guide, 1992, The Math Works.Google Scholar