Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T14:40:38.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stress concentration in rectangular cut-outs under pure shear

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

B. Bandyopadhyay
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India
R. Karmakar
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India

Extract

The presence of cut-outs in shell structures causes perturbations in the original stress system, so that in the region of the cut-out the local stress level in the sheet may be increased many times. These stress concentrations can be considerably reduced, and in some cases entirely eliminated by the use of a suitably chosen shape of cut-out, and by the use of a suitable reinforcing member around the edge.

The factors which influence the magnitude of these stress concentrations are the shape of the cut-out and the dimensions of the reinforcement. The geometry of the shell itself is generally of only secondary importance, provided that the size of the cut-out is small compared with the radius of curvature of the shell.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1981 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Houghton, D. S. Stress concentrations around cut-outs in a cylinder. JRAeS, Vol 65, p 201, March 1961.Google Scholar
2. Houghton, D. S. and Rothwell, A. The stresses around some unreinforced cut-outs under various loading conditions. The College of Aeronautics, Cranfield, Report No. 146, March 1961.Google Scholar
3. Savin, G. N. Stress concentrations around holes, Veb. Verlag, Technik, Berlin, 1956.Google Scholar
4. Wittrick, W. H. Some simple transformation functions for square and triangular holes with rounded corners, Aeronautical Quarterly, Vol 11, p 195199. May 1960.Google Scholar
5. Timoshenko, S. and Goodier, J. N. Theory of elasticity, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1951.Google Scholar