Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T12:22:34.256Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Review of Panel Flutter at Low Supersonic Speeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

D. J. Johns
D. J. Johns*
Affiliation:
Loughborough College of Technology
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It has been shown both experimentally and theoretically that the Mach number range from 1·0 to 1·5 is very critical for panel flutter. Also, the correlation between experiment and theory in the above range has generally been poor.

Sufficient papers have now been written which are relevant to the title subject that it is possible to make a review of the subject and to make recommendations for further work. These papers are reviewed in approximate chronological order. In all cases the panels referred to are rectangular and unswept with the air flow on one side only, unless otherwise stated.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 69 , Issue 657 , September 1965 , pp. 627 - 631
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Isaacs, R. P. Transtability flutter of supersonic aircraft panels. USAF Project Rand P-101, The Rand Corp. July 1949.Google Scholar
2.Hayes, W. D. A buckled plate in a supersonic stream. North American Aviation Inc. Rep. AL-1029, May 1950.Google Scholar
3.Miles, J. W. Dynamic chordwise stability at supersonic speeds. North American Aviation Inc. Rep. AL-1140, October 1950.Google Scholar
4.Nelson, H. C. and Cunningham, H. J. Theoretical investiga tion of flutter of two-dimensional flat panels with one sur face exposed to supersonic potential flow. NACA Rep. 1280, 1956. (First published, April 1955).Google Scholar
5.Sylvester, M. A. and Baker, J. E. Some experimental studies of panel flutter at Mach number 1-3. NACA TN 3914, February 1957. (First published, December 1952).Google Scholar
6.Sylvester, M. A., Nelson, H. C. and Cunningham, H. J. Experimental and theoretical studies of panel flutter at Mach numbers 1-2 to 30. NACA RM L55E 18b, July 1955.Google Scholar
7.Sylvester, M. A. Experimental studies of flutter of buckled rectangular panels at Mach numbers from 12 to 30 includ ing effects of pressure differential and panel width-length ratio. NASA TN D-833, May 1961. (First published December 1955).Google Scholar
8.Acum, W. E. A. Note on the theory of panel flutter. ARC 18 734-01288. 10th October 1956.Google Scholar
9.Luke, Y. L. and St.John, A. Supersonic panel flutter. WADC TR 57-252. Midwest Res. Inst., July 1957.Google Scholar
10.Fung, Y. C. On two-dimensional panel flutter. J. Aero. Sci., Vol. 25 (3), 145, March 1958. (First published June 1957).Google Scholar
11.Lock, M. H. Flutter of two-dimensional panels in transonic regions. Minta Martin Award Papers. Inst. Aero. Sci., 1958.Google Scholar
12.Miles, J. W.On panel flutter in the presence of a boundary layer. J. Aero/Space Sci., Vol. 26 (2), 81, February 1959.Google Scholar
13.Miles, J. W. and Rodden, W. P.On the supersonic flutter of two-dimensional infinite panels. J. Aero/Space Sci., Vol. 26 (3), 190, March 1959.Google Scholar
14.Fung, Y. C. A summary of the theories and experiments on panel flutter. GALCIT AFOSR TN 60-224, May 1960. (Also published as ARC 23 639-01674, April 1962).Google Scholar
15.Lock, M. H. and Fung, Y. C. Comparative experimental and theoretical studies of the flutter of flat panels in a low supersonic flow. GALCIT AFOSR TN 670, May 1961.Google Scholar
16.Tuovila, W. J. and Presnell, J. G., Supersonic panel flutter test results for flat fibre-glass sandwich panels with foamed cores. NASA TN D-827, June 1961.Google Scholar
17.Faure, G. Transonic panel flutter (in French). La Rech. Aero. No 88, May/June 1962.Google Scholar
18.Lock, M.A note on the application of the quasi-steady supersonic flow theory to flutter analysis. J. Aero/Space Sci., Vol. 29 (9), 1133, September 1962.Google Scholar
19.Mcclure, J. D. On perturbed boundary layer flows. MIT Dynamics Rep. 62-2, June 1962. (Also published as IAS paper 63-21).Google Scholar
20.Anderson, W. J. and Fung, Y. C. The effect of an idealised boundary layer on the flutter of cylindrical shells in super sonic flow. GALCIT Struct. Dyn. Rep. SM 62-49, Dec. 1962.Google Scholar
21.Stearman, R., Lock, M. H. and Fung, Y. C. Ames tests on the flutter of cylindrical shells. GALCIT Struct. Dyn. Rep. SM 62-37, December 1962.Google Scholar
22.Fung, Y. C. Some recent contributions to panel flutter re search, IAS paper 63-26, January 1963. (Also published as AIAA Jour., Vol. 1 (4), 898, April 1963).Google Scholar
23.Zeydel, E. F. E. and Kobett, D. R. The flutter of flat plates with partially clamped edges in the low supersonic region. IAS paper 63-25, January 1963.Google Scholar
24.Cunningham, H. J. Analysis of the flutter of flat rectangular panels on the basis of exact three-dimensional linearised supersonic potential flow. IAS paper 63-22, January 1963. (Also published as AIAA Jour., Vol. 1 (8), 1795, August 1963).Google Scholar
25.Dowell, E. and Voss, H. M.The effect of a cavity on panel vibration. AIAA Jour., Vol. 1 (2), 476, February 1963.Google Scholar
26.Shirk, M. H. and Olsen, J. J. Recent panel flutter research and applications. AGARD Rep. 475, September 1963.Google Scholar
27.Bolotin, V. V.Non-conservative problems in the theory of elastic stability. Pergamon Press, 1963.Google Scholar
28.Voss, H. M. and Dowell, E. H.Effect of aerodynamic damping on the flutter of thin panels. AIAA Jour., Vol. 2 (1), 119, January 1964.Google Scholar
29.Kobett, D. R. and Zeydel, E. F. E. Research on panel flutter. NASA TN D-2227, November 1963.Google Scholar