Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T20:22:57.466Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Recent applications of advanced computational methods in the aerodynamic design of transport aircraft configurations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

F. T. Lynch*
Affiliation:
Douglas Aircraft Company, McDonnell Douglas Corporation

Extract

Aerodynamic designers of transport aircraft have been dreaming for decades of being able to use, for high speed design problems, some of the advanced computational tools that they now have available to them such as the three-dimensional transonic flow methods and three-dimensional finite-difference boundary-layer methods. It is anticipated by the designer and his management that the appropriate use of these new advanced computational methods on the wing design of the next subsonic transport aircraft configuration will typically result in an improved aerodynamic technology level, an improved aerodynamic efficiency for a given level of aerodynamic technology, and reduced design costs through a reduction in the amount of wind tunnel testing required and the resulting shortened time period required to define the final lines.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1978 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Henne, P. A. and Hicks, R. M. Transonic wing analysis using advanced computational methods. AIAA Paper 78–105, 1978.Google Scholar
2. Chen, A., Tinoco, E. and Yoshihara, H. Transonic computational design modifications of the F–111 TACT. AIAA Paper 78–106, 1978.Google Scholar
3. Mason, W., MacKenzie, D. A., Stern, M. A. and Johnson, J. K. A numerical three-dimensional viscous transonic wing-body analysis and design tool. AIAA Paper 78–101, 1978.Google Scholar
4. Jameson, A. and Caughey, D. A. Numerical calculation of the transonic flow past a swept wing. New York University ERDA Report COO–3017–140, 1977.Google Scholar
5. Cebeci, T., Kaups, K. and Ramsey, J. A. A general method for calculating three-dimensional compressible laminar and turbulent boundary layers on arbitrary wings. NASA CR–2777, 1977.Google Scholar
6. McLean, J. D. Three-dimensional turbulent boundary-layer calculations for swept wings. AIAA Paper 77–3, 1977.Google Scholar
7. Kordulla, W. Inviscid-viscous interaction in transonic flows about finite three-dimensional wings. AIAA Paper 77–209, 1977.Google Scholar
8. Nash, J. F. and Scruggs, R. M. An implicit method for the calculation of three-dimensional boundary layers on finite thick wings. AFFDL TR–77–122, Vol III, 1977.Google Scholar
9. Cebeci, T. Calculation of three-dimensional boundary layers. I. Swept infinite cylinders and small cross flow. AIAA J, Vol 12, June 1974, pp 779786.Google Scholar
10. Keller, H. B. and Cebeci, T. Accurate numerical methods for boundary layers, II. Two-dimensional turbulent flows. AIAA J, Vol 10, September 1972, pp 11971200.Google Scholar
11. Cebeci, T. and Bradshaw, P. Momentum Transfer in Boundary Layers. McGraw-Hill/Hemisphere Book Co., 1977.Google Scholar
12. Moore, F. K. Displacement effect of a three-dimensional boundary layer. NACA Report 1124, 1953.Google Scholar
13. Ballhaus, W. F., Bailey, F. R. and Frick, J. Improved computational treatment of transonic flow about swept wings. Advances in Engineering Sciences, Vol 4, 1976, pp 13111320.Google Scholar
14. Boope, C. W. Calculation of transonic wing flows by grid embedding. AIAA Paper 77–207, 1977.Google Scholar
15. Caughey, D. A. and Jameson, A. Accelerated iterative calculations of transonic nacelle flow fields. AIAA Paper 76–100, 1976.Google Scholar
16. Melnick, R. E., Chow, R. and Mead, H. R. Theory of viscous transonic flow over airfoils at high Reynolds numbers. AIAA Paper 77–680, 1977.Google Scholar
17. Michel, R., Mignosi, A. and Quemard, C. The induction driven tunnel T2 at ONERA-CERT: Flow qualities, testing techniques and examples of results. AIAA Paper 78-767, 1978.Google Scholar