Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T01:37:00.274Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Psychologist's Point of View

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

K. C. Corkindale
K. C. Corkindale*
Affiliation:
Institute of Aviation Medicine, RAE, Farnborough
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The main contribution of psychology to the design of displays up to the present time has been in advising on detailed points of design. It is suggested that there are three areas in which psychology can make a useful contribution; these are

(a) in stating the basic characteristics of the human operator, particularly the working of the perceptual mechanism,

(b) in stating the effect of environmental conditions on performance, and

(c) in assessing the information required and in advising on man's rôle in the system.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 69 , Issue 658 , October 1965 , pp. 659 - 662
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Morgan, C. T., Cook, J. S., Chapanis, A. and Lund, M. W.Human Engineering Guide to Equipment Design. McGraw-Hill, London, 1963.Google Scholar
2.Cherry, E. C. JAcoust Soc Amer 25, 975, 1953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Mowbray, G. H. JExp Psychol 46, 365, 1953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Broadbent, D. E.Psychol Rev 64, 205, 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Loveless, N. E. Signal Detection with Simultaneous Visual and Auditory Presentation. Flying Personnel Research Committee, Report No. FPRC 1027, 1957. 1. Google Scholar
6.Buckner, D. N. and Mcgrath, J. J. A Comparison of Performance on Single and Dual Sensory Mode Vigilance Tasks. (Human Factor Problems in Anti-Submarine Warfare, Tech Rpt No. 8) Human Factors Research Inc, California, 1961.Google Scholar
7.Wulfeck, J. W., Weisz, A. and Raben, M. W. Vision in Military Aviation. US Air Force, WADC Tech Rpt 58-399, 1958.Google Scholar
8.Audley, R. J.Decision-Making in Experimental Psychology. A. Summerfield (Ed). Brit Med Bull 20, 1, 1964.Google Scholar
9.Reason, J. T. Individual Differences in Decision-Making. Institute of Aviation Medicine, Report No. 278, Farnborough, 1964.Google Scholar
10.Clark, B. “Fascination“: a Cause of Pilot Error. US Navy School of Aviation Medicine. Res Proj NM001.059.01.35, Pensacola, Florida, 1953.Google Scholar
11.Porter, M. Target Fascination. Skyways 10, 4, 20, 1951.Google Scholar
12.Bursill, A. E.Quart J Exp Psychol 10, 113, 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Drew, G. C. Experimental Study of Mental Fatigue. Flying Personnel Research Committee, Report No. FPRC 227, 1940.Google Scholar
14.Davis, R. D.Pilot Error. Air Ministry, Publication 3139A, HMSO, London, 1948.Google Scholar
15.Fitts, P. M. (Ed). Human Engineering for an Effective Air Navigation and Traffic Control System. National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1951.Google Scholar
16.Jordan, N. JAppld Psychol 47, 161, 1963.Google Scholar
17.Brown, I. D. Trans Ass Industr Med Offrs 14, 44, 1964.Google Scholar