Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T15:53:09.462Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prediction of the dynamic characteristics of helicopters in constrained flight

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

D. G. Thomson
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Glasgow
R. Bradleyt
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Glasgow

Abstract

In circumstances where a pilot is forced to follow a specified flight path, such as during a landing approach or in nap-of-the-earth conditions, it will be shown that there is an apparent modification of the helicopter's stability characteristics. This effect is identified in helicopter flight data from nap-of-the-earth agility trials where oscillations are observed in the time histories of the pilot's control inputs and the vehicle's response. A technique of predicting the nature of these oscillations using a linearised helicopter mathematical model is developed. The model is inverted to give the response of the unconstrained states in terms of those strongly controlled by the need to remain on a specific flight path. Results are compared with data from flight trials and it is shown that good correlation between the period of the oscillations in the flight data and the predicted values can be obtained.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1990 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Royal Society University Research Fellow

Lecturer

References

1. Milne, R. D. The analysis of weakly coupled dynamic systems, Int J Guidance Control, 1965, Vol. 2.Google Scholar
2. Milne, R. D. and Padfield, G. D. The strongly controlled aircraft, Aeronautical Q, May 1971.Google Scholar
3. Thomson, D. G. Evaluation of Helicopter Agility Through Inverse Solution of the Equations of Motion; Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Aeronautics and Fluid Mechanics, University of Glasgow, May 1987.Google Scholar
4. Thomson, D. G. and Bradley, R. Recent Developments in the Calculation of Inverse Solutions of the Helicopter Equations of Motion, Proceedings of the UK Simulation Council Triennial Conference, September 1987.Google Scholar
5. Thomson, D. G. and Bradley, R. Development and verification of an algorithm for helicopter inverse simulation, Vertica, 1990, 14, (2), pp 185200.Google Scholar
6. Thomson, D. G. and Bradley, R. An investigation of Flight Path Constrained Helicopter Manoeuvres by Inverse Simulation, Proceedings of the 13th European Rotocraft Forum, Aries, France, September 1987.Google Scholar
7. Charlton, M. T., Padfield, G. D. and Horton, R. I. Helicopter Agility in Low Speed Manoeuvres, Paper 9.10, Proceedings of the 13th European Rotorcraft Forum Arles, France, September 1987.Google Scholar
8. Padfield, G. D. and Charlton, M. T. Aspects of RAE Flight Research into Helicopter Agility and Pilot Control Strategy, Proceedings of the Helicopter Handling Qualities Specialists Meeting, Ames Research Centre, Moffet Field, June 1986.Google Scholar
9. Padfield, G. D., Charlton, M. T. and Houston, S. S. Observations of pilot control strategy in helicopter low level flying tasks, Vertica, 1988, 12, (3).Google Scholar
10. Thomson, D. G. and Bradley, R. An Investigation of Pilot Strategy in Helicopter Nap-of-the-Earth Manoeuvres by Comparison of Flight Data and Inverse Simulations, Proceedings of the Royal Aeronautical Society Conference: Helicopter Handling Qualities and Control, London, November 1988.Google Scholar
11. Padfield, G. D. A Theoretical Model of Helicopter Flight Mechanics for Application to Piloted Simulation, RAE TR81048, April 1981.Google Scholar
12. Thomson, D.G. and Bradley, R. The Use of Inverse Simulation for Conceptual Design, Proceedings of the 16th European Rotorcraft Forum, Glasgow, Scotland, September 1990.Google Scholar
13. Thomson, D.G. and Bradley, R. Modelling and Classification of Helicopter Combat Manoeuvres, Proceedings of ICAS Congress, Stockholm, Sweden, September 1990.Google Scholar
14. Thomson, D. G. and Bradley, R. Validation of Helicopter Mathematical Models by Comparison of Data from Nap-of-the- Earth Flight Tests and Inverse Simulations, Paper No. 78, Proceedings of the 14th European Rotorcraft Forum, Milan, Italy, September 1988.Google Scholar
15. Thomson, D. G., Bradley, R. and Murray-Smith, D. J. Verification and Validation of Helicopter Flight MechanicsModels, Proceedings of the 3rd European Simulation Congress, Edinburgh, Scotland, September 1989.Google Scholar
16. Thomson, D.G. and Bradley, R. Inverse Solution of the Helicopter Linearised Equations of Motion, Department of Aeronautics and Fluid Mechanics, University of Glasgow, Internal Report G.U. Aero 8707, December 1987.Google Scholar
17. Houston, S.S. On the Benefit of an Active Horizontal Tailplane to the Control of the Single Main and Tail Rotor Helicopter, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Aeronautics and Fluid Mechanics, University of Glasgow, December 1984.Google Scholar
18. Houston, S. S. A Computer Based Study of Helicopter Agility Including the Influence of an Active Tailplane, Proceedings of the 10th European Rotorcraft Forum, September 1984.Google Scholar