1.Jamison, L., Sommer, G.S. and Porche, I.R. High-Altitude Airships for the Future Force Army, Rand Arroyo Center TR-234-A, 2005, Santa Monica, CA.
2.Colozza, A. Initial feasibility assessment of a high altitude long endurance airship. NASA CR-2003-212724, 2003.
3.Liu, P.Q., Duan, Z., Ma, L. and Ma, R. Aerodynamics properties and design method of high efficiency-light propeller of stratospheric airships. Int Conf Remote Sens, Environ Transp Eng, June 2011, pp 8041–8044. doi:10.1109/RSETE.2011.5964019.
4.Liu, P.Q., Tang, Z.H., Chen, Y.X. and Guo, H. Experimental feasibility assessment of counter-rotating propellers for stratospheric airships. 53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA 2015–1019, January 2015. doi:10.2514/6.2015-1029.
5.Xu, J.H., Song, W.P., Yang, X.D. and Zhang, Y. Investigation on improving efficiency of high-altitude propeller with tandem configuration. 35th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, AIAA 2017–3575, June 2017. doi:10.2514/6.2017-3575.
6.Zha, G.C., Carroll, B.F., Paxton, C.D. and Conley, C.A. High-performance airfoil using coflow jet flow control, AIAA J, 2007, 45, (8), pp 2087–2090. doi:10.2514/1.20926.
7.Cheng, Y.F., Che, X.K. and Nie, W.S. Numerical study on propeller flow-separation control by DBD-plasma aerodynamic actuation, IEEE Trans Plasma Sci, April 2013, 41, (4), pp 892–898. doi:10.1109/TPS.2013.2248384.
8.Xu, J.H., Song, W.P. and Yang, X.D. Effects of proplet on propeller efficiency, Am Inst Phy Conf Series, September 2011, 1376, (1), pp 165–168. doi:10.1063/1.3651864.
9.Tang, Z.H., Liu, P.Q., Chen, Y.X. and Guo, H. Experimental study of counter-rotating propellers for high-altitude airships, J Propul Power, 2015, 31, (5), pp 1491–1496. doi:10.2514/1.B35746.
10.Biermann, D. and Gray, W.H. Wind-tunnel tests of single- and dual-rotating pusher propellers having from three to eight blades, NACA ARR-(WR-L-359), February 1942.
11.Paik, K.J., Hwang, S., Jung, J., Lee, T. and Lee, Y.Y. Investigation on the Wake Evolution of contra-rotating propeller using RANS computation and SPIV measurement, Inter J Naval Archit Ocean Eng, 2015, 7, (3), pp 595–609. doi:10.1515/ijnaoe-2015-0042.
12.Xin, G.Z., Ding, E.B. and Tang, D.H. A design method for contra-rotating propeller by lifting- surface method, J Ship Mech, April 2006, 10, (2), pp 40–46 (in Chinese).
13.Biermann, D. and Hartman, E.P. Wind-tunnel tests of four- and six-blade single- and dual-rotating tractor propellers, NACA Rept, 1942, 28, (747).
14.McHugh, J.G. and Pepper, E. The characteristics of two model six-blade counter-rotating pusher propellers of conventional and improved aerodynamic design, NACA ARR-(WR-L-404), June 1942.
15.Coney, W.B. A Method for the Design of a Class of Optimum Marine Populsors, PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1989.
16.Epps, B., Chalfant, J., Kimball, R., Techet, A. and Chryssostomidis, C. OpenProp: An open-source parametric design and analysis tool for propellers, 2009 Grand Challenges in Modeling & Simulation Conference, Istanbul, Turkey, 2009, pp 104–111.
17.Epps, B.P. and Kimball, R.W. Unified rotor lifting line theory, J Ship Res, December 2013, 57, (4), pp 181–201. doi:10.5957/JOSR.57.4.110040.
18.Lerbs, H.W. Moderately loaded propellers with a finite number of blades and an arbitrary distribution of circulations, Trans Soc Naval Archit Marine Eng, 1952, 60, pp 73–123.
19.Morgan, W. The design of counterrotating propellers using Lerbs’ theory, Trans Soc Naval Archit Marine Eng, 1960, 68, pp 6–38.
20.Morgan, B.M. and Wrench, J.W. Some computational aspects of propeller design, Method Comput Phy, 1965, 4, pp 301–331.
21.Kerwin, J.E., Coney, W.B. and Hsin, C.Y. Optimum circulation distributions for single and multi-component propulsors, Twenty-First American Towing Tank Conference, Washington, DC, August 1986, pp 53–62.
22.Laskos, D. Design and Cavitation Performance of Contra-rotating Propeller, SM thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2010.
23.Epps, B.P. An Impulse Framework for Hydrodynamic Force Analysis: Fish Propulsion, Water Entry of Spheres, and Marine Propellers, PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2010.
24.Zheng, X.K., Wang, X.L., Cheng, Z.J. and Han, D. The efficiency analysis of high-altitude propeller based on vortex lattice lifting line theory, Aeronaut J, February 2017, 121, (1236), pp 141–162. doi:10.1017/aer.2016.112.
25.Selig, M.S. and Guglielmo, J.J. High-lift low Reynolds number airfoil design, J Aircraft, January 1997, 34, (1), pp 72–79. doi:10.2514/2.2137.
26.Ma, R. and Liu, P.Q. Numerical simulation of low-Reynolds-number and high-lift airfoil S1223, Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2009, WCE 2009, London, July 2009, 2, pp 1691–1696.
27.FLUENT Software Package, Ver 6.3.26, FLUENT Inc., 2006.
28.Spalart, P.R. and AllMarchas, S.R. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows, 30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, AIAA Paper 92–0439, Reno, NV, U.S.A, January 1992. doi:10.2514/6.1992-439.