Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

The onset of compressibility effects for aerofoils in ground effect

  • G. Doig (a1), T. J. Barber (a1), E. Leonardi (a1) and A. J. Neely (a2)

Abstract

The influence of flow compressibility on a highly-cambered inverted aerofoil in ground effect is presented, based on two-dimensional computational studies. This type of problem has relevance to open-wheel racing cars, where local regions of high-speed subsonic flow form under favourable pressure gradients, even though the maximum freestream Mach number is typically considerably less than Mach 0·3. An important consideration for CFD users in this field is addressed in this paper: the freestream Mach number at which flow compressibility significantly affects aerodynamic performance. More broadly, for aerodynamicists, the consequences of this are also considered. Comparisons between incompressible and compressible CFD simulations are used to identify important changes to the flow characteristics caused by density changes, highlighting the inappropriateness of incompressible simulations of ground effect flows for freestream Mach numbers as low as 0·15.

Copyright

References

Hide All
1. Zhang, X., Toet, W. and Zerihan, J.. Ground effect aerodynamics of race cars, Applied Mech Reviews, 2006, 59, pp 3349.
2. Kim, C.S., Chongam, K. and Rho, O.H., Computations of high-lift aerofoil flows using two-equation turbulence models AIAA 99-0542.
3. Katz, J.. Aerodynamics of race cars, Annual Review of Fluid Mech, 2006, 38, pp 2763.
4. Katz, J., Calculation of the aerodynamic forces on automotive lifting surfaces, ASME J Fluids Eng, 1985, 107, pp 438443.
5. Ranzenbach, R. and Barlow, J., Two-dimensional aerofoil in ground effect, an experimental and computational study, 1994, SAE Paper 94-2509.
6. Ranzenbach, R. and Barlow, J., Cambered aerofoil in ground effect: an experimental and computational study, 1996, SAE Paper 96-0909.
7. Zerihan, J. and Zhang, X.. Aerodynamics of a single element wing in ground effect, J Aircr, 2000, 37, (6), pp 10581064.
8. Zerihan, J. and Zhang, X.. Aerodynamics of a double element wing in ground effect, AIAA J, 2003, 41, (6), pp 10071016.
9. Mahon, S. and Zhang, Z.. Computational analysis of pressure and wake characteristics of an aerofoil in ground effect, J Fluids Eng, 2005, 127, pp 290298.
10. Mahon, S. and Zhang, Z.. Computational analysis of a inverted double-element aerofoil in ground effect, J Fluids Eng, 2006, 128, pp 11721180.
11. Zerihan, J. and Zhang, X., A single element wing in ground effect; comparisons of experiments and computation, 2001, AIAA Paper 2001-0423.
12. Roller, S. and Munz, C.D.. A low Mach number scheme based on multi-scale asymptotics, Computing and Visualization in Science, 2000, 3, (1/2), pp 8591.
13. Keshtiban, I.J., Belblidia, F. and Webster, M.F., Compressible flow solvers for low Mach number flows — a review, 2004, University of Wales Computer Science Report CSR-2004.
14. Zerihan, J., An Investigation into the Aerodynamics of Wings in Ground Effect, 2001, PhD thesis, University of Southampton, School of Engineering Sciences.
15. Barber, T.J., Leonardi, E. and Archer, R.D.. Causes for discrepancies in ground effect analyses, Aeronaut J, 2002, 106, (1066), pp 653657.
16. Roache, P.J.. Quantification of uncertainty in computational fluid dynamics, Annual Review of Fluid Mech, 1997, 29, pp 123160.
17. Shih, T.H., Liou, W.W., Shabbir, A., Yang, Z. and Zhu, J.. A new k-ω eddy-viscosity model for high Reynolds number turbulent flows — model development and validation, Computers & Fluids, 1995, 24, (3), pp 227238.
18. Kader, B., Temperature and concentration profiles in fully turbulent boundary layers, Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 1981, 24, (9), pp 15411544.
19. Liou, W.W., Huang, G. and Shih, T.H.. Turbulence model assessment for shock wave/turbulent boundary-layer interaction in transonic and supersonic flows, Computers and Fluids, 2000, 29, pp 275299.
20. Gonclaves, E. and Houdeville, R.. Turbulence model and numerical scheme assessment for buffet computations, Int J for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2004, 46, pp 11271152.
21. Menter, F.R.. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications, AIAA J, 1994, 32, (8), pp 15981605.
22. Spalart, P. and Allmaras, S., A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows, 1992, AIAA Paper 92-0439.
23. Brunet, V.. Computational study of buffet phenomenon with unsteady RANS equations, 2003, 21st AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, AIAA Paper 2003-3679.
24. Xiao, Q., Tsai, H.M. and Liu, F.. Numerical study of transonic buffet on a supercritical aerofoil, AIAA J, 2006, 44, (3), pp 620628.
25. Deck, S.. Numerical simulation of transonic buffet over a supercritical aerofoil, AIAA J, 2005, 43, (7), pp 15561566.
26. Lee, B.H.K.. Transonic buffet on a supercritical aerofoil, Aeronaut J 1990, 94, (935), pp 143152.
27. Lee, B.H.K.. Oscillation shock motion caused by transonic shock boundary layer interaction, AIAA J, 1990, 28, (5), pp 942944.
28. Lee, B.H.K.. Self-sustained shock oscillations on aerofoils at transonic speeds, Prog in Aerospace Sci, 2001, 37, pp 147196.
29. Fackrell, J.E., The Aerodynamics of an Isolated Wheel Rotating in Contact with the Ground, 1974, PhD thesis, University of London.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

The onset of compressibility effects for aerofoils in ground effect

  • G. Doig (a1), T. J. Barber (a1), E. Leonardi (a1) and A. J. Neely (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.