Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T21:40:14.859Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On self-similar behaviour of the hysteresis loops in pitching motions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

M. R. Soltani
Affiliation:
Sharif University of Technology, Department of Aerospace Engineering, Tehran, Iran
A. R. Davari
Affiliation:
Sharif University of Technology, Department of Aerospace Engineering, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

A new similarity parameter has been used for analyzing the unsteady aerodynamic behaviour of vehicles undergoing sinusoidal pitching motion. If this parameter is identical for two unsteady manoeuvres with different reduced frequencies and oscillation amplitudes, the corresponding hysteresis loops of the force and moment collapse on each other. To support and verify this, extensive unsteady wind tunnel tests have been conducted on a standard model, which is a well known fighter type configuration. The acquired data were used to train a certain type of neural network, called the Generalised Regression Neural Network (GRNN), to reduce the number of wind tunnel runs. The scheme, once proved to give the correct results for various conditions, was applied to extend the experimental data to other conditions that have not been tested in the tunnel. Both the predicted and acquired tunnel data were used to show the performance of the similarity parameter.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2004 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Beyers, M.E. Free flight investigation of high-manoeuvreability missile dynamic, J Spacecraft and Rockets, April 1975, 14, (4), pp 224230.Google Scholar
2. Orlik-Rückeman, K.J. Aerodynamic aspects of aircraft dynamics at high angles-of-attack, J Aircraft, September 1983, 20, (9), pp 737751.Google Scholar
3. Soltani, M.R., Ebrahimi, S.A. and Davari, A.R. A simple analytical method for predicting the amplitude and frequency of a delta wing model undergoing rocking motion, AIAA Paper 2002-0710, March 2002.Google Scholar
4. Soltani, M.R., Bragg, M.B. and Brandon, J.M. Measurements on an oscillating 70 degrees delta wing in subsonic flow, J Aircr, March 1990, 27, (3).Google Scholar
5. Soltani, M.R, Sadati, N. and Davari, A.R. Neural network: A new prediction tool for estimating the aerodynamic behavior of a pitching delta wing, AIAA Paper 2003-3793, 2003.Google Scholar
6. Soltani, M.R. An Experimental Study of the Relationship Between Forces and Moments and Vortex Breakdown on a Pitching Delta Wing, PhD Thesis, Department of Aeronautical Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1992.Google Scholar
7. Hummel, D. and Srinivasan, P.S. Vortex break down effects on the low speed aerodynamic characteristics of slender delta wings in symmetrical flow, Aeronaut J, 1967, 71, pp 319322.Google Scholar
8. Soltani, M.R. and Davari, A.R. A new method based on neural network To predict the unsteady aerodynamic behavior of two Different models undergoing pitching motion, submitted to the J Aircr, September 2003.Google Scholar
9. Beyers, M.E. SDM Pitch and Yaw axis stability derivatives, AIAA Paper 851827, 1985.Google Scholar
10. Schmidt, E. Standard dynamics model experiments with the DFVLR/AVA Transonic derivative balance, AGARD CP-386, May 1985.Google Scholar
11. Jansson, T. and Torngren, L. New dynamic testing techniques and related results at FFA, AGARD CP-386, May 1985.Google Scholar
12. Specht, D.F., A general regression neural network, IEEE Trans. On Neural Networks, 2, (6), pp 568576, 1991.Google Scholar
13. Wentz, W.H. Wind Tunnel Investigations of Vortex Break Downs, PhD Dissertation, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, 1968.Google Scholar
14. Fan, Y. Identification of an Unsteady Aerodynamic Model up to High Angle-of-Attack Regime, PhD Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, November 1997.Google Scholar
15. Khrabrov, A.N. Private communications.Google Scholar