Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-cx56b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-08T05:15:34.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modelling requirements in flight simulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

A. G. Barnes
A. G. Barnes*
Affiliation:
RAeS Flight Simulation Group
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It would be difficult to exaggerate the impact of models on our lives — in recreation, education, investigation, inspiration, and intuition. The models can be real or abstract, static or dynamic, simple or complex, and scaled in size or time. Their use can be either explicit or implicit. Appreciation of the value of models has been heightened by the availability of desktop computing power. Experts on any topic cannot be interviewed on TV without a personal computer in the background, to reinforce their image.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 98 , Issue 980 , December 1994 , pp. 395 - 404
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1992 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Rolfe, J.M. and Staples, K.J. (Editors). Flight Simulation, Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
2. Conversion formulae for rotation and translation of axes, Engineering Sciences Data Unit, ESDU Item 67004, London 1967.Google Scholar
3. Geometric and kinematic relationships for various axis systems, Engineering Sciences Data Unit, ESDU Item 67036, London, 1967.Google Scholar
4. Fogarty, L.E. and Howe, R.M. Computer mechanisation of six degree of freedom flight equations, NASA CR 1344, May 1969.Google Scholar
5. Smith, J.M. Mathematical Modelling and Digital Simulation for Engineers and Scientists, John Wiley, New York, 1979.Google Scholar
6. Cardullo, F.M., Kaczmarck, M. and Waycechowsky, B.J. A comparison of several numerical integration algorithms employed in real time simulation, AIAA-91-2979-CP, Flight Simulation Technologies Conference, New Orleans, August 1991.Google Scholar
7. Etkin, B. The Dynamics of Flight, John Wiley, New York, 1959.Google Scholar
8. The equations of motion of a rigid aircraft, Engineering Sciences Data Unit, ESDU Item 67003, London, 1966.Google Scholar
9. Hanke, CR. and Nordwall, D.R. The simulation of a large jet transport aircraft, Vol 1: Mathematical model, NASA CR 1756, 1971.Google Scholar
10. Tomlinson, B.N. SESAME — A system of equations for the simulation of aircraft in a modular environment, RAE Tech Report 79008, 1979.Google Scholar
11. Goldberg, B. and Lin, K-C. The orientation representation in the draft military standard for distributed interactive simulation, AIAA- 91-2944-CP. University of Central Florida, Presented at Flight Simulation Technologies Conference, New Orleans, 1991.Google Scholar
12. Hopkins, H.R. A scheme of notation and nomenclature for aircraft dynamics and associated dynamics, ARC R&M 3562 (Parts 1-5), 1966.Google Scholar
13. Atmospheric data for performance calculations, Engineering Sciences Data Unit, ESDU Item 68046, London, 1968.Google Scholar
14. Van De Moesdijk, G.A. Simulation of patchy atmospheric turbulence, based on measurements of actual turbulence, In: AGARD CP 198, October 1975.Google Scholar
15. Ivan, M. A ring vortex downburst model for flight simulations, J Aircraft, March 1986, 23, pp 232–236.Google Scholar
16. Frictional and retarding forces on aircraft tyres, Engineering Sciences Data Unit, ESDU Item 71026, London, 1981.Google Scholar
17. Yager, T.J., Vogler, W.A. and Baldasare, P. Evaluation of two transport aircraft and several ground vehicle friction measurements obtained for various runway surface types and conditions, NASA Technical Paper 2917, February 1990.Google Scholar
18. US Industry Service Working Group (ISWG) Project 2851 Newsletter, Planning Research Corporation, McLean, Va., March 1990.Google Scholar
19. Scarlatos, L.L. A refined triangulation hierarchy for multiple levels of terrain detail, In: Proceedings of the 1990 Image V Conference, June 1990.Google Scholar
20. Peters, D.L. FLIR — A Different World, In: Proceedings of the 1990 Image V Conference, June 1990.Google Scholar
21. Piloted simulation effectiveness, AGARD-CP-513, Proceedings of AGARD FMP Symposium, Brussels, October 1991.Google Scholar
22. Schlien, J. Positive in-flight centering simulated flight controls and high fidelity flight handling qualities, In: Data Issues for Flight Simulation, RAeS Conference, 10-11 November 1993.Google Scholar