Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T18:46:24.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Investigation on frequency influence on the transverse pulsed jet in a supersonic crossflow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2022

Z.-Z. Xu
Affiliation:
College of Aerospace Science and Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, Hunan 410073, People’s Republic of China
Y.-M. Zhou
Affiliation:
College of Aerospace Science and Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, Hunan 410073, People’s Republic of China
J.-P. Wu*
Affiliation:
College of Aerospace Science and Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, Hunan 410073, People’s Republic of China
W. Huang*
Affiliation:
College of Aerospace Science and Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, Hunan 410073, People’s Republic of China
*
*Correspondence authors. Emails: wujiping07@nudt.edu.cn, gladrain2001@163.com
*Correspondence authors. Emails: wujiping07@nudt.edu.cn, gladrain2001@163.com

Abstract

The pulsed jet is a novel and effective active mixing enhancement approach. For the transverse pulsed jet in the supersonic crossflow, the frequency influence is investigated using the three-dimensional Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations coupled with the SST k-ω turbulence model. The averaged flow field properties of the pulsed jet are better than those of the steady jet when considering mixing efficiency and jet penetration depth, especially for the case with the pulsed frequency being 50kHz. The flow field structures of the pulsed jet are connected with the time, with periodic wave structures generating in the flow field and moving downstream. The size of the wave structures and its distance are related to the frequency, namely the size and flow distance are relatively small at 50kHz, and it takes some time for the pulsed jet to establish its influence in the full flow field. At low frequencies, the flow field produces large fluctuations, and this may be detrimental to the stable operation of the engine.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Huang, W., Liu, J., Jin, L. and Yan, L. Molecular weight and injector configuration effects on the transverse injection flow field properties in supersonic flows, Aerosp Sci Technol, 2014, 32, (1), pp 94102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S.H. Characteristics of dual transverse injection in scramjet combustor, part 2: Combustion, J Propul Power, 2006, 22, (5), pp 10201026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, M.B. and Hu, Z.W. Formation of surface trailing counter-rotating vortex pairs downstream of a sonic jet in a supersonic cross-flow, J Fluid Mech, 2018, 850, pp 551583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, J., Kouchi, T., Takita, K. and Masuya, G. Large-eddy simulation of jet in supersonic crossflow with different injectant species, AIAA J, 2013, 50, (12), pp 27652778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, W. Transverse jet in supersonic crossflows, Aerosp Sci Technol, 2016, 50, pp 183195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, W. Mixing enhancement strategies and their mechanisms in supersonic flows: A brief review, Acta Astronaut, 2018, 145, pp 492500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choubey, G., Yuvarajan, D., Huang, W., Yan, L., Babazadeh, H. and Pandey, K.M. Hydrogen fuel in scramjet engines - A brief review, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45, (33), pp 1679916815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choubey, G., Yuvarajan, D., Huang, W., Shafee, A. and Pandey, K.M. Recent research progress on transverse injection technique for scramjet applications-a brief review, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45, (51), pp 2780627827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randolph, H., Chew, L. and Johari, H. Pulsed jets in supersonic crossflow, J Propul Power, 1994, 10, pp 746748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narayanan, S., Barooah, P. and Cohen, JM. Dynamics and control of an isolated jet in crossflow, AIAA J, 2003, 41, (12), pp 23162330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A., Harding, G. and Diskin, G. High frequency supersonic pulsed injection, 39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kouchi, T., Sakuranaka, N., Izumikawa, M. and Tomioka, S. Pulsed transverse injection applied to a supersonic flow, 43rd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kouchi, T., Sasaya, K., Watanabe, J., Shibayama, H. and Masuya, G. Penetration characteristics of pulsed injection into supersonic crossflow, 46th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shi, H.T., Wang, G.L., Luo, X.S., Yang, J.M. and Lu, X.Y. Large-eddy simulation of a pulsed jet into a supersonic crossflow. Comput Fluids, 2016, 140, pp 320333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, N.J., Moeller, T.M. and Thompson, R.J. Numerical simulations of high frequency transverse pulsed jet injection into a supersonic crossflow, Aerosp Sci Technol, 2020, 103, p 105908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, L.Q., Huang, W., Yan, L., Zhao, Z.T. and Liao, L. Mixing enhancement and penetration improvement induced by pulsed gaseous jet and a vortex generator in supersonic flows, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42, (30), pp 1931819330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du, Z.B., Huang, W., Yan, L. and Li, S.B. Reynolds-average Navier-Stokes study of steady and pulsed gaseous jets with different periods for the shock-induced combustion ramjet engine, Phys Fluids, 2019, 31, (5), p 055107.Google Scholar
Zhao, M.J. and Ye, T.H. URANS study of pulsed hydrogen jet characteristics and mixing enhancement in supersonic crossflow. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44, (36), pp 2049320503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, M.J., Li, Q.L. and Ye, T.H. Investigation of an optimal pulsed jet mixing and combustion in supersonic crossflow, Combust Flame, 2021, 227, pp 186201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdem, E. and Kontis, K. Numerical and experimental investigation of transverse injection flows, Shock Waves, 2010, 20, (2), pp 103118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santiago, J.G. and Dutton, J.C. Velocity Measurements of a Jet Injected into a Supersonic Crossflow. J Propul Power, 1997, 13: 264273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawai, S. and Lele, S.K. Large-eddy simulation of jet mixing in supersonic crossflows. AIAA J, 2010, 48, (9), 20632083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerlinger, P., Stoll, P., Kindler, M., Schneider, F. and Aigner, M. Numerical investigation of mixing and combustion enhancement in supersonic combustors by strut induced streamwise vorticity, Aerosp Sci Technol, 2008, 12, (2), pp 159168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S.H. and Mitani, T. Mixing augmentation of transverse injection in scramjet combustor. J Propul Power, 2003, 19, (1), pp 115124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar