Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T17:53:27.334Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of Reynolds and Mach numbers on two-dimensional wind-tunnel testing: An experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2016

B. Rasuo
B. Rasuo*
Affiliation:
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Belgrade, Serbia
*
brasuo@mas.bg.ac.rs
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this note, the experimental results of wind-tunnel measurements of lift coefficient and lift-curve slope for aerofoil NACA 0012 obtained from the VTI-Institute Zarkovo, are presented. The results were obtained from tests and integrations of surface static-pressure data over a model of the NACA 0012 aerofoil section. The data were obtained for a free-stream Mach number range of 0·25-0·8 and a chord Reynolds number range of 2-25MRe. The essential results of these measurements along with the results from other authors are presented and evaluated. The principal factors which influence the accuracy of two-dimensional wind-tunnel test results are analysed. The influences of Reynolds number, Mach number and wall interference with reference to solid and flow blockage as well as the influence of side-wall boundary-layer control are analysed. Interesting results brought to light the Reynolds number effects of the test model versus Reynolds number effects of the facility in subsonic and transonic flow as well as the effects of the side-wall boundary-layer control and wall interference.

Type
Technical Note
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 115 , Issue 1166 , April 2011 , pp. 249 - 254
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2011 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Mccroskey, W.J. Round table discussion on: Wall interference in wind tunnels. AGARD Conference No. 335, London, UK, 1982.Google Scholar
2. Rasuo, B. Two-dimensional transonic wind tunnel wall interference. MB-28/PAMM, Technical University of Budapest, Hungary, 2003.Google Scholar
3 Rasuo, B. On sidewall boundary-layer effects in two-dimensional subsonic and transonic wind tunnels, ZAMM, 2001, 81, 4, pp 275–276.Google Scholar
4 Lo, C.F. Tunnel interference assessment from measurements on two interfaces, AIAA J, 1990, 28, (81), pp 1481–1484.Google Scholar
5 Ohman, L.H. et al, Progress in wind tunnel interference assessment/correction procedures at the NAE, NASA Conference, Public. 2319, Hampton, Virginia, US, 1983.Google Scholar
6 Fujii, K, Progress and future prospects of CFD in aerospace – Wind tunnel and beyond, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2005, 41, (6), pp 455–470.Google Scholar