Skip to main content Accessibility help

Influence of propeller slipstream on vortex flow field over a typical micro air vehicle

  • S. Sudhakar (a1), A. Chandankumar (a1) and L. Venkatakrishnan (a1)


An experimental study has been carried out to explore the effect of propeller-induced slipstream on the vortex flow field on a fixed-wing Micro Air Vehicle (MAV). Experiments were conducted at a freestream velocity of 10 m/s, corresponding to a Reynolds number based on a root chord of about 1.6 × 105. Surface flow topology on the surface of the MAV wing at propeller-off and propeller-on conditions was captured using surface oil flow visualisation at four angles of incidence. The mean off-body flow over the MAV was documented in the four spanwise planes at different chord position using Stereoscopic Particle Image Velocimetry (SPIV) technique at angle-of-attack of 24° for both conditions. The oil flow visualisation showed minimal differences in flow patterns for propeller-off and propeller-on conditions at 10° and 15° incidence. The small asymmetry between port and starboard side observed at 20° during the propeller-off condition became significantly pronounced at 24°. The fuselage stub which is necessary for housing the motor of the propeller was seen to have a significant effect on the flow symmetry at large incidences that can occur when the MAV encounters sudden vertical gusts. Switching on the propeller restored the symmetry at both incidences. SPIV measurements were carried out at the incidence of 24° which exhibited the highest asymmetry. The off-body data shows the re-establishment of symmetry during propeller-on condition owing to the increase in the magnitude of spanwise and vertical velocities as a result of the propeller slipstream. The findings emphasise the importance of considering the propeller flow and design of the motor housing while evaluating the aerodynamics of low-aspect-ratio MAVs.


Corresponding author


Hide All
1. Mueller, T.J. and DeLaurier, J.D. Aerodynamics of small vehicles, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, October 2003, 35, (1), pp 89111.
2. Pelletier, A. and Mueller, T.J. Low Reynolds number aerodynamics of low-aspect-ratio, thin/flat/cambered-plate wings, J Aircraft, May 2000, 37, (5), pp 825832.
3. Torres, G.E. and Mueller, T.J. Low aspect ratio aerodynamics at low Reynolds numbers, AIAA J, May 2004, 42, (5), pp 865873.
4. Shyy, W., Lian, Y., Tang, J., Viieru, D. and Liu, H. Aerodynamics of low Reynolds number flyers, October 2007, volume 22, Cambridge University Press.
5. Mueller, T.J. and Torres, G.E. Aerodynamics of low aspect ratio wings at low Reynolds numbers with applications to micro air vehicle design and optimization, UNDAS-FR-2025 November 2001, Notre Dame Research, University of Notre Dame, US.
6. Jian, T. and Ke-Qin, Z. Numerical and experimental study of flow structure of low-aspect-ratio wing, J Aircraft, May 2004, 41, (5), pp 11961201.
7. Khabatta, P., Ukeiley, L., Tinney, C., Standford, B. and Ifju, P. Flow characteristics of a three-dimensional fixed micro air vehicle wing, 38th Fluid Dynamic Conference and Exhibit, Paper No. 2008-3020, 2008, Seattle, Washington, US.
8. Mukund, R. and Chandan Kumar, A. Effect of MAV configuration on flow and performance, National Aerospace Laboratories, Tech Rep, 2014-1003, August 2014, Bangalore, India.
9. Witkowski, D.P., Lee, A.K. and Sullivan, J.P. Aerodynamic interaction between propellers and wings, thin/flat/cambered-plate wings, J Aircraft, September 1989, 26, (9), pp 829836.
10. Snyder, M. and Zumwalt, G.W. Effects of wingtip-mounted propellers on wing lift and induced drag, thin/flat/cambered-plate wings, J Aircraft, May 1969, 6, (5), pp 392397.
11. Chiaramonte, J.Y., Favier, D., Maresca, C. and Benneceur, S. Aerodynamic interaction study of the propeller/wing under different flow configurations, J Aircraft, January 1996, 33, (1), pp 4653.
12. Roosenboom, E.W., Heider, A. and Schrder, A. Numerical and experimental study of flow structure of low-aspect-ratio wing, J Aircraft, May 2009, 46, (2), pp 442449.
13. Null, W., Noseck, A. and Shkarayev, S. Effects of propulsive-induced flow on the aerodynamics of micro air vehicles, Paper No. 2005-4616, 23rd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, June 2005, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
14. Thipyopas, C., and Moschetta, J. Comparison pusher and tractor propulsion for micro air vehicle applications, SAE Technical Paper, 2006-01-2397, August 2006, Kansas, US.
15. Catalano, F.M. On the effects of an installed propeller slipstream on wing aerodynamic characteristics, Acta Polytechnica, October 2004, 44, (3), pp 814.
16. Ananda, G.K., Deters, R.W. and Selig, M.S. Propeller induced flow effects on wings at low Reynolds numbers, Paper No. 2013-3193, 31st AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, June 2013, San Diego, California, US.
17. Arivoli, D., Dodamani, R., Antony, R., Suraj, C.S., Ramesh, G. and Ahmed, S. Experimental studies on a propelled micro air vehicle, Paper No.2011-3656 29st AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, June 2011, Hawaii US.
18. Choi, S., Ahn, J., Maresca, C. and Benneceur, S. A computational study on the aerodynamic influence of a pusher propeller on a MAV, 40th Fluid Dynamic Conference and Exhibit, volume 28, 2010, Chicago, Illinois, US, pp 20252032.
19. Deng, S., Van Oudheusden, B.W., Xiao, T. and Bijl, H. A computational study on the aerodynamic influence of a propeller on an MAV by unstructured overset grid technique and low Mach number preconditioning, Open Aerospace Engineering J, January 2009, 5, pp 1121.
20. Gamble, B. and Reeder, M.F. Experimental analysis of propeller-wing interactions for a micro air vehicle, J Aircraft, January 2009, 46, (1), pp 6573.
21. Austin, R. Unmanned Aircraft Systems: UAVs Design, Development and Deployment, volume 54, 2010, John Wiley.
22. Tropea, C., Yarin, A.L. and Foss, J.F. Springer Handbook of Experimental Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 1, Springer Science and Business Media, 2007.
23. Willert, C., Raffel, M., Kompenhans, J., Stasicki, B. and Kahler, C. Recent applications of particle image velocimetry in aerodynamic research, Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 1996, 7, pp 247256.
24. Ericsson, L.E. Challenges in high-alpha vehicle dynamics, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, December 1995, 31, (4), pp 291334.
25. Viswanath, P.R. Vortex asymmetry and induced side forces on elliptic cones at high incidence, J Aircraft, September 1995, 32, (5), pp 10181025.
26. Ol, M.V. An experimental investigation of leading edge vortices and passage to stall of non-slender delta wings, 2003, Air Force Research Lab, Wright-Patterson AFB Ohio, Air Vehicles Directorate.
27. Ol, M.V. and Gharib, M. Leading edge vortex structure of non-slender delta wings at low Reynolds number, AIAA J, January 2003, 41, (1), pp 1626.
28. Gordnier, R.E. and Visbal, M.R. Compact difference scheme applied to simulation of low-sweep delta wing flow, AIAA J, August 2005, 43, (8), pp 17441752.
29. Delery, J.M. Aspects of vortex breakdown, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, December 1994, 30, (1), pp 159.
30. Anthony, M., Pascal, M. and Didier, B. Characterization of vortex breakdown by flow field and surface measurements, 38th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, January 2006, Reno, Nevada, US.
31. Goruney, T. and Rockwell, D. Flow past a delta wing with a sinusoidal leading edge: Near-surface topology and flow structure, Experiments in Fluids, August 2009, 47, (2), pp 321331.
32. Tobak, M. and Peake, D.J. Topology of three-dimensional separated flows, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 1982, 14, pp 6185.
33. Taylor, G.S., Schnorbus, T. and Gursul, I. An investigation of vortex flows over low sweep delta wings, 33rd Fluid Dynamic Conference and Exhibit, Paper No. 2008-3020, June 2003, Orlando, Florida, US.


Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Influence of propeller slipstream on vortex flow field over a typical micro air vehicle

  • S. Sudhakar (a1), A. Chandankumar (a1) and L. Venkatakrishnan (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.