Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T02:57:38.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Flapping Flight of Birds. II

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2016

Extract

In a paper in the number of this journal for November, 1925, it was shown that if a flying machine were fitted with wings of standard section and these were flapped in a rhythmical manner, the machine would be supported and propelled, its weight, dimensions and velocity being those of a typical bird; the degree of accuracy attempted in the analysis did not exceed five per cent.

A subsequent examination of the power involved established a high efficiency; but this was due to a large amount of negative work during up–beats; and although such conditions might be maintained in a mechanical model they were unlikely in a bird, which has a large muscle, the pectoralis minor, for lifting its wings. In a bird efficiency seemed to require that the angle of incidence of the outer portion during an up–beat should be negative (see §7, p. 593, of the previous paper); the angle was however made zero (see §9) in order to secure adequate lift, and it is this feature which gives rise to the negative work.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1927

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Note on page 338 * It is easily seen that r/l integrates to 5S/18, S/6 and S/18 over the outer, middle and inner thirds; r2/l2 integrates to 19S/81, 7S/81 and S/81; r3/l3 yields 65S/324, 5S/108, and S/324; r4/l4 yields 211S/1215, 31S/1215 and S/1215; and r5/l5 yields 665S/4374, 7S/486 and S/4374.

Note on page 341 * “Meteorology and the Non–Flapping Flight of Tropical Birds.” Camb. Phil. Proc, XXI., p. 371, 1923.

Note on page 342 † Loc. cit., §§ 8-10, pp. 366-8.