Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T18:32:31.654Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fatigue behaviour under out-of-phase bending and torsion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

D. L. McDiarmid
D. L. McDiarmid*
Affiliation:
The City University, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The ability to design components such as drive shafts, propellers and rotor blades to carry combined bending and torsion alternating stresses, which may be out-of-phase is a common requirement in industry. The test data of Nishihara showed that fatigue limits for ductile materials are apparently higher for combined bending and torsion with phase difference than for the conventional in-phase cyclic stressing case. This is true when the out-of-phase fatigue data are stated in terms of the maximum in-phase shear stress amplitudes. However, Little showed that this apparent increase in fatigue strength is very misleading, as when the fatigue limit data are expressed in terms of the true shear stress amplitudes it becomes clear that the fatigue limit actually decreases as the phase difference increases.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 85 , Issue 842 , March 1981 , pp. 118 - 122
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1981 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Nishihara, T. and Kawamoto, M. The strength of metals under combined alternating bending and torsion with phase difference. Memoirs, College of Engineering, Kyoto, Imperial University, Vol XI, pp 85–112, 1945.Google Scholar
2. Little, R. E. A note on the shear stress criterion for fatigue failure under combined stress. Aeronautical Quarterly, Vol 20, pp 57–60, February 1969.Google Scholar
3. Brown, M. W. and Miller, K. J. A theory for fatigue failure under multi-axial stress strain conditions. Proc IMechE, 187 (65/73), 745, 1973.Google Scholar
4. McDiarmid, D. L. Failure criteria and cumulative damage in fatigue under multi-axial stress conditions. PhD Thesis, The City University, London, 1972.Google Scholar
5. McDiarmid, D. L. A new analysis of fatigue under combined bending and twisting. Aeronautical Journal of the RAeS, Vol 78, pp 325–329, July 1974.Google Scholar
6. Gough, H. J., Pollard, H. V. and Clenshaw, W. J. Some experiments on the resistance of metals to fatigue under combined stress. Aero Res Council Rep Memo 2522,1951.Google Scholar
7. McDiarmid, D. L. A criterion of fatigue failure under out-of-phase multi-axial stresses. Proc of Sixth Canadian Congress of App Mech, Vancouver, June 1977.Google Scholar
8. Miller, K. J. Multi-axial fatigue. Proc Conf on Fatigue Testing and Design, Soc Env Eng, City University, London, April 1976.Google Scholar
9. Little, R. E. and Little, R. W. Analysis of two dimensional cyclic stresses. Developments in Mechanics, Ed Huang, and Johnson, , Vol 3, Part 1, 307.Google Scholar
10. Zenner, H. and Heidenreich, R. Fatigue behaviour under multi-axial stress. Unpublished.Google Scholar
11. Simburger, A. Strength characteristics of ductile materials subjected to multi-axial out-of-phase stresses with fixed or rotating principal stress axes. LBF Report No FB-121, Darmstadt, 1975.Google Scholar
12. Issler, L. Strength relations for metals under multi-axial out-of-phase fatigue loading. PhD Thesis, University of Stuttgart, 1973.Google Scholar
13. Deitmann, H. and Issler, L. Strength calculations under multi-axial out-of-phase loading. Sixth Congress on Material Testing, Budapest, 1974.Google Scholar
14. Lempp, W. Strength behaviour of steels under multi-axial long life fatigue loading consisting of direct stresses with superimposed shear stresses both in-phase and out-of-phase. PhD Thesis, University of Stuttgart, 1977.Google Scholar