Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T02:58:31.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Civil aviation and the environment – the next frontier for the aerodynamicist

Part of: RAeS Lanchester Lecture Papers Sustainable Aerospace

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

J. E. Green
J. E. Green*
Affiliation:
Aircraft Research Association, Bedford, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the coming century, the impact of air travel on the environment will become an increasingly powerful influence on aircraft design. Unless the impact per passenger kilometre can be reduced substantially relative to today’s levels, environmental factors will increasingly limit the expansion of air travel and the social benefits that it brings. The three main impacts are noise, air pollution around airports and changes to atmospheric composition and climate as a result of aircraft emissions at altitude. The lecture will review the work done within the Air Travel – greener by Design programme to assess the technological, design and operational possibilities for reducing these impacts. The main aeronautical disciplines all have something to contribute but it is in aerodynamics that the greatest opportunities appear to lie. If these opportunities are pursued, the aircraft in production in 2050 could be very different from those of 2005. It is for the aerodynamicists, supported by the structures and systems engineers and the materials scientists, to make the case for a radical leap.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 110 , Issue 1110 , August 2006 , pp. 469 - 486
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2006 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ackroyd, J.A.D., Lanchester – The Man, Aeronaut J, April 1992, 96, (954), pp 119–140.Google Scholar
2. Kingsford, P.W., F.W. Lanchester – A Life of an Engineer, Edward Arnold, London, UK, 1960.Google Scholar
3. Lanchester, F.W., Aerodynamics, Constable & Co, London, UK, 1907.Google Scholar
4. Lanchester, F.W., Aerodonetics, Constable & Co, London, UK, 1908.Google Scholar
5. Lanchester, F.W., The flying machine: the aerofoil in the light of theory and experiment, Proc Inst Auto Eng, 1915, 9, pp 171–259.Google Scholar
6. Lanchester, F.W., Aircraft in Warfare, Constable & Co Ltd, London, UK, 1916.Google Scholar
7. Karman, T. von., Lanchester’s contributions to the theory of flight and operational research, J R Aeronaut Soc, 1958, 62, pp 80–93.Google Scholar
8. Green, J.E., Greener by Design – the technology challenge, Aeronaut J, February 2002, 106, (1056), pp 57–113.Google Scholar
9. Green, J.E., Air Travel – Greener by Design – Mitigating the environmental impact of aviation: Opportunities and priorities, Aeronaut J, September 2005, 109, (1099), pp 361–416.Google Scholar
10. Nangia, R.K., Efficiency parameters for modern commercial aircraft, Aeronaut J, August 2006, 110, (1110). pp 495–510 Google Scholar
11. Green, J.E., Küchemann’s weight model as applied in the first Greener by Design Technology Sub Group report: a correction, adaptation and commentary, Aeronaut J, August 2006, 110, (1110). pp 511–516.Google Scholar
12. Department for Transport, Aviation and the environment: using economic instruments, March 2003.Google Scholar
13. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Aviation and the Global Atmosphere, Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
14. Sausen, R., Isaksen, I., Grewe, V., Hauglustaine, D., Lee, D.S., Myhre, G., Köhler, M.O., Pitari, G., Schumann, U., Stordal, F. and Zeferos, C., Aviation radiative forcing in 2000: An update on IPCC (1999), Meteorol Z, 14, (4), pp 555–561 Google Scholar
15. Rogers, H.L., Lee, D.S., Raper, D.W., Foster, P.M.DEF., Wilson, C.W. and Newton, P.J., The impacts of aviation on the atmosphere, Aeronaut J, October 2002, 104, (1064), pp 521–546.Google Scholar
16. Mannstein, H. and Schumann, U., Aircraft induced contrail-cirrus over Europe, Meteorol Z, 2005, 14, pp 549–554.Google Scholar
17. Williams, V. and Noland, R.B., Variability of contrail formation conditions and the implications for policies to reduce the climate impacts of aviation, Transportation Research Part D, 2005, 10, pp 269–280.Google Scholar
18. Gauss, M., Isaksen, I., Grewe, V., Köhler, M., Hauglustaine, D. and Lee, D., Impact of aircraft NOX emissions: effect of changing the flight altitude, Proceedings of EC conference Aviation, Atmosphere and Climate, Friedrichshafen, Germany, 30 June – 3 July 2003, EOR 21051.Google Scholar
19. Klug, H.G., Bakan, S. and Gayler, V., Cryoplane – Quantitative comparison of contribution to anthropogenic greenhouse effect of liquid hydrogen aircraft versus conventional kerosene aircraft, European Geophysical Society, XXI General Assembly, The Hague, The Netherlands, May 1996.Google Scholar
20. Birch, N.T., 2020 Vision: The prospects for large civil aircraft propulsion, Aeronaut J, August 2000, 104, (1038), pp 347–352.Google Scholar
21. Whellens, M.W. and Singh, R., Propulsion system optimisation for minimum global warming potential, Proceedings of ICAS 2002 Congress, Toronto, Canada, September 2002, Paper 7111.Google Scholar
22. Lanchester, F.W., Aerofoils of high aspect ratio, Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, R&M, (109), 1913.Google Scholar
23. Prandtl, L., Tragflügeltheorie, I Mitteilungen, Nachr Ges Wiss Göttingen, Maths-Phys K1, 1918, pp 451–477.Google Scholar
24. Reynolds, O., An experimental investigation of the circumstances which determine whether the motion of water shall be direct or sinuous and of the law of resistance in parallel channels, Phil Trans R Soc A, 1883, 174, pp 933–982.Google Scholar
25. Küchemann, D., The Aerodynamic Design of Aircraft, Pergamon, 1978.Google Scholar
26. Marec, J-P., Drag reduction: a major task for research, CEAS/DragNet European Drag Reduction Conference 2000, Potsdam, Germany June 2000.Google Scholar
27. Prandtl, L., Über Flüssigkeitsbewegung bei sehr kleiner Reibung, Verhandlungen des dritten internationalen Mathematiker-Kongresses, 1904, Heidelberg, Leipzig, Germany.Google Scholar
28. Rayleigh, Lord (Strutt, J.W.) On the stability or instability of certain fluid motions, Proc Lond Matth Soc, 11, (1880), pp 57–70 (see also Tollmien, and Grohne, , Ref. 30 below).Google Scholar
29. Tollmien, W., Über die Entstehung der Turbulenz, I Mitteilung, Nachr Ges Wiss Göttingen, Math-Phys Kl, 1929, pp 21–44. Translation: NACA TM No. 609 (1931).Google Scholar
30. Tollmien, W. and Grohne, D., The Nature of Transition, Boundary Layer and Flow Control, Lachmann, G.V., 2, Pergamon, 1961.Google Scholar
31. Owen, P.R. and Randall, D.G., Boundary layer transition on a swept back wing, 1952, RAE Technical Memorandum No Aero 277 and 1953, RAE Technical memorandum No 330.Google Scholar
32. Pfenninger, E., Some results from the X21 program. Part I: Flow phenomena at the leading edge of swept wings, Recent Developments in Boundary Layer Research, Part IV, May 1965, AGARDograph 97.Google Scholar
33. Gaster, M., A simple device for preventing turbulent contamination of swept leading edges, Aeronaut J, 1965, 69, pp 788–789.Google Scholar
34. Gaster, M., On the flow along swept leading edges, Aeronaut J, 1965, 69, p 788.Google Scholar
35. Poll, D.I.A., Some observations of the transition process on the windward face of a long yawed cylinder, J Fluid Mech, 1985, 150, pp 329–356.Google Scholar
36. Arnal, D., Boundary layer transition. Predictions based on linear theory, April 1994, Special Course on Progress in Transition Modelling, AGARD Report 793.Google Scholar
37. Wong, P.W.C. and Maina, M., Flow control studies for military aircraft applications, AIAA 2nd Flow Control Conference, Portland, Ore, 2004, AIAA 2004-2313.Google Scholar
38. Schrauf, G., Status and perspectives of laminar flow, Aeronaut J, December 2005, 109, (1102), pp 639–644.Google Scholar
39. Blasius, P.R.H., Grenzschichten in Flüssigkeiten mit kleiner Reibung, Z für Mathematik und Physik, 1908, 56, pp 1–37.Google Scholar
40. Pretsch, J., Die Stabilität einer ebenen Laminarströmung bei Druckgefälle und Druckandstieg, Jb dtsch Luftfahrtforsch, 1941, 1, pp 58–75.Google Scholar
41. Head, M.R., Methods of Calculating the Two Dimensional Laminar Boundary-Layer, Boundary Layer and Flow Control, Lachmann, G.V., 2, Pergamon, 1961.Google Scholar
42. Boeing Commercial Airplane Company, Natural laminar flow airfoil analysis and trade studies, NASA Contractor Report 159029, May 1979.Google Scholar
43. Bussman, K. and Müntz, H., Die Stabilität der laminaren Reibungsschicht mit Absaugung, Jb dtsch Luftfahrt, 1942, 1, pp 1–7.Google Scholar
44. Ashill, P.R., Wood, R.F. and Weeks, D.J., An Improved, Semi-Inverse Version of the Viscous Garabedian and Korn Method (VGK), RAE TR 87002, 1987.Google Scholar
45. Schrauf, G. And Kühn, W., Industrial aspects of laminar flow, presented at EC Fourth Aeronautics Days, Hamburg, Germany, January 2001.Google Scholar
46. Lachmann, G.V. (Ed) Boundary Layer and Flow Control, 2, Pergamon, 1961.Google Scholar
47. Maddalon, D.V. and Braslow, A.L., Simulated-airline service flight tests of laminar-flow control with perforated-surface suction system, NASA Technical Paper 2966, Washington DC, USA, March 1990.Google Scholar
48. Braslow, A.L., A History of Suction-Type Laminar-Flow Control with Emphasis on Flight Research, NASA History Division, Monographs in Aerospace History No. 13, Washington DC, USA, 1999.Google Scholar