Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T07:26:28.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Civil aircraft design priorities: air quality? climate change? noise?

Part of: Sustainable Aerospace

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

P. Brooker
P. Brooker*
Affiliation:
Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A variety of related questions is posed. Are the right priorities for future aircraft design being set now? New civil aircraft types could be ‘silent’, i.e. make much less noise than current types. They could be ‘green’, i.e. safeguard the environment. Is silent as important as Green? The crucial answer is that future aircraft design should focus on substantial reductions on climate change impact. The air quality targets proposed by the ‘Sustainable Aviation’ initiative appear very ambitious: they should be pursued only to the extent that they do not affect improved fuel efficiency and reduced climate-changing emissions. Good progress has already been made on the aircraft noise targets proposed by the ‘Sustainable Aviation’ initiative, but again they should be pursued only to the extent that they do not affect improved fuel efficiency and reduced climate-changing emissions. The financial case for designing to reduce aircraft noise in order to deliver novel financial benefits, e.g. increase airport flights at night and/or relocate airports, is weak.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 110 , Issue 1110 , August 2006 , pp. 517 - 532
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2006 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Society of British Aerospace Companies Ltd, Air Travel – Greener by Design, London, 2002. http://www.greenerbydesign.org.uk/PAGES/REPORTS/Greener_by_Design_final_report.pdf Google Scholar
2. Green, J.E., Greener by Design – the technology Challenge, Aeronaut J, 2002, 106, (1056), pp 57–113.Google Scholar
3. Sustainable Aviation A strategy towards sustainable development of UK aviation, 2005. http://www.sbac.co.uk/files/newsdocs/2459/Sustainable%20Aviation%20summary%20document.pdf Google Scholar
4. Cambridge-MIT Institute. Silent Aircraft Initiative, 2005. http://silentaircraft.org/ Google Scholar
5. Morimoto, R. and Hope, C., Making the case for developing a silent aircraft, Transport Policy, 2005, 12, (2), pp. 165–174.Google Scholar
6. Doganis, R., The Airline Business in the 21st Century, Routledge, London, 2000.Google Scholar
7. Doganis, R., Flying Off Course: The Economics of International Airlines, Routledge, London, 2002.Google Scholar
8. Button, K.J., A simple analysis of the rent seeking of airlines, airports and politicians. Transport Policy, 2005, 12, (1), pp. 47–56.Google Scholar
9. Button, K.J., Wings across Europe: towards an efficient European air transport system, Ashgate, Aldershot, UK, 2004.Google Scholar
10. Morrell, P.S., Airline Finance, Ashgate, Aldershot UK, 2002.Google Scholar
11. The Economist, Flying on empty, 2005, May 21st, pp. 73–74.Google Scholar
12 Clark, P., Buying the big jets: Fleet planning for airlines, Ashgate, Aldershot, UK, 2001.Google Scholar
13 Pike, R. and Dobbins, R., Investment Decisions and Financial Strategy, Philip Allan, Oxford, 1986.Google Scholar
14. ICAO Developing Measures for a greener Environment, ICAO J, 2001, 56, (4), http://www.icao.int/icao/en/jr/5604.pdf.Google Scholar
15. Bickel, P., Schmid, S., Krewitt, W. and Friedrich, R. (Eds) External Costs of Transport in ExternE. EC Joule III, 1997. http://externe.jrc.es/trans.pdf Google Scholar
16. POST Aviation and the Environment. POST Report 195, 2003. http://www.parliament.uk/post/pr195.pdf Google Scholar
17. BAA Heathrow Airport interim Master Plan: Draft for Consultation, 2005. http://www.baa.com/main/airports/heathrow/about_heathrow/heathrow_airport_master_plan_frame.html Google Scholar
18. DEFRA The air quality strategy for England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Cm 4548, 2000. http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/airquality/strategy/index.htm Google Scholar
19. DEFRA The air quality strategy for England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland: Addendum, 2003. http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/airquality/strategy/addendum/index.htm Google Scholar
20. DETR [Department of the Environment Transport and the Regions] Valuing the External Costs of Aviation, 2000. http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_aviation/documents/pdf/dft_aviation_pdf_503315.pdf Google Scholar
21. DfT Aviation and the environment: Using economic instruments, 2003. http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_aviation/documents/download-able/dft_aviation_507934.pdf Google Scholar
22. DfT Aviation and the environment: Using economic instruments: Key points made by stakeholders at discussion workshops, 2003. http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_aviation/documents/pdf/dft_aviation_pdf_022751.pdf Google Scholar
23. Dings, J.M.W., Wit, R.C.N., Leurs, B.A., Davidson, M.D. and Fransen, W., External costs of aviation. Main and Background reports. CE Delft Publication number: 02.7700.04. Delft/Amsterdam, 2002. http://www.cedelft.nl/ Google Scholar
24. Hollander, A.E.M., DE Assessing and evaluating the health impact of environmental exposures, Thesis, University of Utrecht ISBN 90-393-3703-9, 2004. http://www.library.uu.nl/digiarchief/dip/diss/2004-0511-67152200/inhoud.htm Google Scholar
25. ICAO Aircraft Engine Emissions: Definition of the problem, 2005. http://www.icao.int/icao/en/env/aee.htm Google Scholar
26. Lampert, J., Stacey, B. and Stevenson, K.J., Air Pollution at Heathrow Airport: Annual Report for 2003. Report to Heathrow Airport Ltd. AEAT/ENV/R/1707(1), 2004. http://www.heathrowairwatch.org.uk/reports/HROW2003_24_5.pdf Google Scholar
27. RCEP [Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution] Consultation on the future of aviation: Response by the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, 2001. http://www.rcep.org.uk/news/02-05.htm Google Scholar
28. RCEP The environmental effects of civil aircraft in flight. Special Report, 2002. http://www.rcep.org.uk/aviation.htm Google Scholar
29. EC Thematic Strategy on Air Pollution, COM (2005), 446 final, 2005. http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/air/cafe/index.htm Google Scholar
30. Department of Health Website on Air Pollution, 2005. http://www.dh.gov.uk/PolicyAndGuidance/HealthAndSocialCareTopics/AirPollution/fs/en Google Scholar
31. COMEAP Advice: The health effects of air Pollutants, 2000. http://www.advisorybodies.doh.gov.uk/comeap/. Google Scholar
32. POST [Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology] Air Quality in the UK. Number 188, 2002. http://www.parliament.uk/post/pn188.pdf Google Scholar
33 DEFRA Air Quality Headline Indicator for Sustainable Development: 2004 (Provisional -13 January), 2005. http://www.defra.gov.uk/news/2005/050113a.htm Google Scholar
34 Brunekreef, B. and Holgate, S., Air Pollution and health, Lancet, 2002, 360, pp 1233–1242.Google Scholar
35 Chilton, S., Covey, J., Jones-Lee, M., Loomes, G. and Metcalf, H., Air quality: Valuation of health benefits associated with reductions in air pollution. A report for DEFRA, 2004. http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/airquality/airpoll_health/airpollution_reduction.pdf Google Scholar
36. AEA Technology Environment An evaluation of the air quality strategy – main report and additional analysis. Final Report to DEFRA. ED50232: Evaluation of the Air Quality Strategy Issue 4. Research on behalf of DEFRA by AEA Technology Environment, EMRC, the Institute of Occupational Medicine and Metroeconomica, 2004. http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/airquality/strategy/evaluation/report-index.htm Google Scholar
37. WHO (2005). Health effects of transport-related air Pollution. Krzyzanowski, M., Kuna-Dibbert, B. and Schneider, J. (Eds), 2005. http://www.euro.who.int/document/e86650.pdf Google Scholar
38. DfT Government response to the Environmental Audit Committee’s report on Budget 2003 and Aviation, 2003. http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_aviation/documents/page/dft_aviation_026255.pdf Google Scholar
39. IPCC [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] Penner, J.E., Lister, D.H., Griggs, D.J., Dokken, D.J., and Mcfarland, M. (Eds.) Aviation and the Global Atmosphere, Cambridge University Press, UK, 1999. http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc/aviation/ Google Scholar
40. IPCC Watson, R.T. and the Core Writing Team (Eds), Third Assessment Report: Climate Change 2001, IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 2001. http://www.ipcc.ch/pub/un/syreng/spm.pdf Google Scholar
41. Williams, V., Noland, R.B. and Toumi, R., Reducing the climate change impacts of aviation by restricting cruise altitudes, Transportation Research D, 2002, 7, (6), pp. 451–464.Google Scholar
42. DfT Aviation and Global Warming, 2004. http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_aviation/documents/page/dft_aviation_031850.pdf Google Scholar
43. Ceronsky, M., Hepburn, C., Obersteiner, M., and Yamagata, Y., Clashing strategic cultures and climate policy, Climate Policy, 2005, 4, (4), pp 347–357.10.3763/cpol.2004.0426Google Scholar
44. Jones, P.D. and Palutikof, J., Climatic Research Unit: Information sheet 1: Global Temperature Record, 2005. http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/info/warming/ Google Scholar
45. Mannstein, H., Spichtinger, P. and Gierens, K., A note on how to avoid contrail cirrus. Transportation Research Part D, 2005, 10, (5), pp 421–426.Google Scholar
46. Sausen, R., Isaksen, I., Grewe, V., Haglustaine, D., Lee, D.S., Myhre, G., KÖhler, M.O., Pitari, G., Schumann, U., Stordal, F. and Zerefos, C., Aviation radiative forcing in 2000: An update on IPCC (1999), Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 2005, 14, (4), pp 555–561.Google Scholar
47. Joshi, M., Shine, K., Ponater, M., Stuber, N., Sausen, R. and Li, L., A comparison of climate response to different radiative forcings in three general circulation models: towards an improved metric of climate change, Climate Dynamics, 2003: 20, pp 843–854.Google Scholar
48. Clarkson, R. and Deyes, K., Estimating the Social Cost of Carbon Emissions. Government Economic Service Working Paper 140. HM Treasury/DEFRA, 2002. http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/media/2E817/SCC.pdf Google Scholar
49. Eyre, N., Downing, T., Hoekstra, R., Rennings, K. and Tol, R., Global Warming Damages., Final Report of the ExternE Global Warming SubTask. DGXII, European Commission, Brussels, 1999.Google Scholar
50. DfT [Department for Transport] Control of Development in Airport Public Safety Zones. DfT Circular 1/2002, 2002. http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_aviation/documents/page/dft_aviation_503576.pdf Google Scholar
51. Evans, A.W., Foot, P.B., Mason, S.M., Parker, I.G. and Slater, K., Third Party Risk near Airports and Public Safety Zone Policy. R&D Report 9636, NATS for Department of the Environment, Transport and Regions, London, 1997.Google Scholar
52. RSSB [Rail Safety and Standards Board] Annual Safety Performance Report 2004, 2005. http://www.rssb.co.uk/pdf/reports/Annual%20Safety%20Performance%20Report%202004.pdf Google Scholar
53. Brooker, P., The UK Aircraft Noise Index Study: 20 Years On, Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics, 2004b, 26, (2), pp. 20–30.Google Scholar
54. Luczak, H., Arbeitswissenschaft. 2. Auflage, Springer, Berlin, 1998.Google Scholar
55. Brooker, P., Critchley, J.B., Monkman, D.J. and Richmond, C., United Kingdom Aircraft Noise Index Study (ANIS): Main Report DR Report 8402. Civil Aviation Authority on behalf of the Department of Transport, CAA, London, 1985.Google Scholar
56. Monkman, D.J., Rhodes, D.P. and Deeley, J., Noise Exposure contours for Heathrow 2004. ERCD Report 0501. CAA for DfT, 2005.Google Scholar
57. Meecham, W.C., and Shaw, N., Effects of Jet Noise on Mortality Rates, British Journal of Audiology, 1979, 13, pp 77–80.Google Scholar
58. Frerichs, R., Beeman, B.L. and Coulson, A.H., Los Angeles Airport Noise and Mortality – Faulty Analysis and Public Policy, American Journal of Public Health, 1980, April, pp 357–362.Google Scholar
59. Lercher, P., Stansfeld, S.A. and Thompson, S.J., Non-Auditory Health Effects of Noise: Review of the 1993-1998 Period, Noise Effects – 98 Conference Proceedings, 1998.Google Scholar
60. Stansfeld, S.A., Haines, M.M., Burr, M., Berry, B., and Lercher, P.A., Review of Environmental Noise and Mental Health, Noise and Health, 2000, 2, (8), pp 1–8.Google Scholar
61. Franssen, E.A.M., Wiechen, C.M.A.G., Van, , Nagelkerke, N.J.D. and Lebret, E., Aircraft noise around a large international airport and its impact on general health and medication use, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 2004, 61, pp 405–413.Google Scholar
62. Griefahn, B., Medical Aspects: Physiological and Psychological Consequences of Noise with Special Regard to Aircraft Noise. Europäische Akademie Expert Meeting on Environmental Noise (2002). Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler, 2004. See Friedrich(62) for Web address.Google Scholar
63. Friedrich, R., External Costs of Aircraft Noise, Europäische Akademie Expert Meeting on Environmental Noise (2002). Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler, 2004. http://www.europaeische-akademie-aw.de/susanis/global/download.php/news/pdf/id/8/GR36.pdf Google Scholar
64. Pearsons, K.S., Barber, D.S. and Tabachnick, B.G., Analyses of the Predictability of Noise-Induced Sleep Disturbance, (HSD-TR-89-029), Brooks Air Force Base. (HSD/YA-NSBIT), 1989.Google Scholar
65. Ollerhead, J. B., Jones, C.J. et al Report of a Field Study of Aircraft Noise and Sleep Disturbance, DfT, 1992. Summary/update is at: http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_aviation/documents/pdf/dft_aviation_pdf_503578.pdf Google Scholar
66. Porter, N.D., Kershaw, A.D. and Ollerhead, J.B., Adverse effects of night-time aircraft noise. Department of Operational Research and Analysis, National Air Traffic Services Ltd. R&D Report 9964, 2000. http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/33/ERCD9964.pdf Google Scholar
67. Hume, K.I., Van, F. and Watson, A., Effects of Aircraft Noise on Sleep: EEG-based Measurements. Report prepared for the CAA and DfT, 2003 http://www.cate.mmu.ac.uk/CAAreport0603.pdf Google Scholar
68. Berglund, B., Lindvall, T. and Schwela, D.H., Guidelines for Community Noise WHO [World Health Organization], Geneva, 1999. Available at www.who.int.Google Scholar
69. WHO [World Health Organization] Noise and Sleep. WHO Regional Office for Europe website, 2004. http://www.euro.who.int/Noise/activities/20040304_1 Google Scholar
70. DfT Night Flying Restrictions at Heathrow, Gatwick and Stansted Airports: Stage 2 of consultation on restrictions to apply from 30 October 2005, 2005. http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_aviation/documents/pdf/dft_aviation_pdf_038168.pdf Google Scholar
71. Schagen, I. and Benton, T. ‘The Relationships between School and Pupil Background Factors and Progress From Key Stage 1 to Key Stage 2’ (Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Edinburgh), 2003. http://www.nfer.ac.uk/publications/other-publications/conference-papers/pdf_docs/ISTBbera03.pdf Google Scholar
72. Stansfeld, S.A., Review on state of the art in children and noise. 3rd International Conference on children’s health and the Environment, 2004. Slides at http://www.pinche.hvdgm.nl/icche/presentations/Stansfeld_s.pdf Google Scholar
73. FICAN [Federal Interagency Committee on Aviation Noise] FICAN position on research into effects of aircraft noise on classroom learning, Washington, D.C., 2000. http://www.fican.org/download/Effects_aircraft.pdf Google Scholar
74. Stansfeld, S.A., Berglund, B., Clark, C., Lopez-Barrio, I., Fischer, P., Ohrstrom, E., Haines., M.M., Head, J., Hygge, S., Van Kamp., I., Berry, B.F., RANCH study team. Aircraft and road traffic noise and children’s cognition and health: a cross-national study. Lancet, 2005, 365, (9475), pp 1942–9.Google Scholar
75. Walters, A.A., Noise and Prices, Oxford University Press, London, 1975.Google Scholar
76. Nelson, J.P., Airport Noise and Property Values, J Transport Economics and Policy, 2004, 38, (1), pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
77. Schipper, Y.P., Environmental costs in European Aviation. Transport Policy, 2004, 11, pp 141–154.Google Scholar
78 Pearce, B. and Pearce, D., Setting Environmental Taxes for Aircraft: A Case Study of the UK. CSERGE Working Paper GEC 2000-26, 2000. http://www.uea.ac.uk/env/cserge/pub/wp/gec/gec_2000_26.pdf Google Scholar
79. Pearce, B., Aviation and the environment: using economic instruments: A report to the Sustainable Development Commission, 2003. http://www.sd-commission.gov.uk/pubs/aviation/annex.htm Google Scholar
80. Spackman, M., Time discounting and of the cost of capital in government, Fiscal Studies, 2004, 25, (4), pp 467–518.Google Scholar
81. Portney, P.R. and Weyant, J.P. (Eds). Discounting and Intergenerational Equity, Resources for the Future, Washington, USA, 1999.Google Scholar
82. Tomkins, J., Topham, N., Twomey, J. and Ward, R., Noise versus access: The impact. of an airport in an urban property market, Urban Studies, 1998, 35, (2), pp 243–258.Google Scholar
83. Feitelson, E., Hurd, R. and Mudge, R., The impact of airport noise on willingness to pay for residences, Transportation Research D: Transport and Environment, 1996, 1, 1–14.Google Scholar
84. Praag, B.M., Van, and Baarsma, B.E., Using happiness surveys to value intangibles: The case of airport noise, The Economic Journal, 2005, 500, pp 224–246.Google Scholar
85. Kluizenaar, Y. DE., Passchier-Vermeer, W. and Miedema, H., Adverse effects of noise exposure to health. Report prepared for the EC Project UNITE by TNO PG, Leiden, Netherlands, 2001.Google Scholar
86. MPD Group Limited, Assessing the economic costs of night flight restrictions. Report for EC DTREN, 2005. http://europa.eu.int/comm/transport/air/environment/doc/ecnf.pdf Google Scholar
87. HACAN (2005). HACAN ClearSkies Night Flights Booklet, 2005. http://www.hacan.org.uk/resources/reports/hacan.night_flight_booklet.pdf Google Scholar
88. WHO European Centre for Environment and Health (2004). Technical meeting on Sleep and health: 22-24 January 2004, Bonn, Germany, 2004. http://www.euro.who.int/Noise/Activities/20030925_1 Google Scholar
89. Powell, C.A. and Preisser, J.S., NASA Subsonic Jet Transport Noise Reduction Research, 22nd Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, 2000. http://techreports.larc.nasa.gov/ltrs/PDF/2000/mtg/NASA-2000-22cicas-cap.pdf Google Scholar
90. Wurzel, D., Technical Developments in the Field of Aircraft Noise Reduction. Akademie Expert Meeting on Environmental Noise (2002). Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler, 2004. See Friedrich(62) for Web address.Google Scholar
91. Hepperle, M., Environmental Friendly Transport Aircraft.13th DGLR/STAB Symposium 2002, München, Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design, Springer, 87, 2004. http://www.mh-aerotools.de/company/paper_8/environmental_friendly_air-craft_stab_2002.pdf Google Scholar
92. DEFRA [Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs] Noise Mapping England: The London Road Traffic Noise Map, 2004. http:/www.noisemapping.org/docs/LondonRoadTrafficNoiseMap.doc Google Scholar
93. ODPM [Office of the Deputy Prime Minister] Planning Policy Guidance 24: Planning and Noise, 2005. http://www.odpm.gov.uk/stellent/groups/odpm_planning/documents/page/odpm_plan_606912.hcsp Google Scholar
94. Lind, R.C. (Ed) Discounting for Time and Risk in Energy Policy, Resources for the Future, Washington, 1982.Google Scholar
95. Dickens, C., Dombey and Son, Penguin Classics, London, 1848/2004.Google Scholar
96. Kumar, A. and Hefner, J.N., Future Challenges and Opportunities in Aerodynamics, 22nd Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, 2000. http://techreports.larc.nasa.gov/ltrs/PDF/2000/mtg/NASA-2000-22cicas-ak.pdf Google Scholar
97. ACARE [Advisory Council for Aeronautical Research in Europe], 2005. Acare Website Home page. http://www.Acare4europe.org/ Google Scholar
98. Rolls-Royce [Group plc] Powering a better world: Environment report 2003, 2004. http://www.rolls-royce.com/community/downloads/environment04/environment.pdf Google Scholar
99. RAE [Royal Academy of Engineering] Memorandum to House of Commons Transport Select Committee Inquiry into Aviation, 2003. http://www.raeng.org.uk/policy/responses/pdf/aviation.pdf Google Scholar
100. Kershaw, A.D., Rhodes, D.P. and Smith, N.A., The influence of ATC in approach noise abatement. 3rd USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar Napoli, 2000. http://atm-seminar-2000.eurocontrol.fr/acceptedpapers/pdf/paper107.pdf Google Scholar
101. Morris, K.M., The Airline Approach to Noise Mitigation with Particular Reference to Continuous Descent Approach Procedures, Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics, 2004, 26, (2), pp 70–79.Google Scholar
102. CAA [Civil Aviation Authority] A technical evaluation of initial trials of quieter approach procedures at London (Heathrow) Airport – Summary report. CAA Paper 78002, CAA, London, 1978.Google Scholar
103. Brooker, P., Delivering Safety in the context of Environmental Restrictions: Aviation Expert and Research Review, CAA Paper 2004/08, 2004. http://www.caa.co.uk/application.aspx?categoryid=33&pagetype=65&applicationid=11&mode=detail&id=1346 Google Scholar
104. Lee, D.S. and Sausen, R., New Directions: Assessing the real impact of CO2emissions trading by the aviation industry, Atmospheric Environment, 2000, 34, pp 5337–5338.Google Scholar
105. EPA [USA Environmental Protection Agency] Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation. EPA 230-F-97-008qq, 2005. [NB dated September 1997]. http://yosemite.epa.gov/oar/globalwarming.nsf/UniqueKeyLookup/SHSU5BWHN8/$File/tx_impct.pdf Google Scholar
106. Green, J.E. & Greener by Design Science and Technology Sub Group, Air travel greener by Design – mitigating the environmental impact of aviation opportunities and priorities. Aeronaut J, 2005, 109, (1099), pp 361–416.Google Scholar
107. House of Lords, Including the aviation sector in the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme, Report with Evidence, European Union Committee, 21st Report of Session 2005-06. HL Paper 107, 2006. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldselect/ldeu-com/107/107.pdf Google Scholar
108. Lee, D.S., Presentations: the impacts of aviation on climate: why a different approach may be necessary for non-CO2 impacts; Potential Options to Address non-CO2 impacts. 2006. At http://forum.europa.eu.int/Public/irc/env/eccp_2/library?l=/work_group_aviation/2nd_meeting&vm=detailed&sb=Title Google Scholar
109. Forster, P.M., DE, F., Shine, K.P. and Stuber, N., It is premature to include non-CO2 effects of aviation in emission trading schemes. Atmospheric Environ, 2006, 40, pp 1117–1121.Google Scholar
110. DfT Night-time movements limits at Heathrow to stay the same, Press Release. 8 May 2006. http://www.gnn.gov.uk/environment/fullDetail.asp?ReleaseID=199971&NewsAreaID=2&NavigatedFromDepartment=False Google Scholar
111. Brooker, P., Aircraft noise: annoyance, house prices and valuation, Acoustics Bulletin, 2006, May/June, pp. 29–32.Google Scholar
112. The Economist, Special report: the oil Industry, 2006, 22 April, pp 79–82.Google Scholar