Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T06:37:05.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An investigation into the longitudinal dynamics and control of a flapping wing micro air vehicle at hovering flight

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

K. Loh
Affiliation:
Flight Dynamics Group, College of Aeronautics, Cranfield University, UK
M. Cook
Affiliation:
Flight Dynamics Group, College of Aeronautics, Cranfield University, UK
P. Thomasson
Affiliation:
Flight Dynamics Group, College of Aeronautics, Cranfield University, UK

Abstract

This paper describes the research into the flight dynamics modelling and flight control of a flapping wing micro aerial vehicle (MAV). The equations of motion based on a multi-body representation of the vehicle and the flapping wings were derived and form the basis for the simulation program, which was developed using MATLAB and SIMULINK. The aerodynamic forces were obtained through experimental methods and form the basis for the aerodynamic model.

The hovering and low speed flight of the MAV was investigated using a SIMULINK simulation model. Various flight control concepts, inspired by observation of insect and bird flight, were investigated in some detail. The concepts include the control of flap frequency, flap and pitch phasing (wing beat kinematics) and shift in centre of gravity position. The paper concludes with a comparison of the control concepts and their feasibility for a practical vehicle application.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2003 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. McMasters, J.H. and Henderson, M.L., Low speed single element airfoil synthesis, Technical Soaring, 1980, 6: pp 121.Google Scholar
2. Ellington, C.P., The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight I: The quasi-steady analysis, Phil Trans R Soc Lond, 1984, B 305, pp 115p Google Scholar
3. Ellington, C. P, The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight VI : Lift and power requirements, Phil Trans R Soc Lond, 1984, B 305, pp 145181 Google Scholar
4. Francis, R.H. and Cohen, J., The flow near a wing which starts suddenly from rest and then stalls, Memo Aeronaut Res Comm, 1933, 1561.Google Scholar
5. Dickinson, M.H. and Lehmann, F.O., Sane, S.P., Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight, Science, 1999, 284, pp 19541960.Google Scholar
6. Dudle, Y R. and Ellington, C.P., Mechanics of forward flight in bumble bees I: Kinematics and morphology, J Exp Biol, 1990, 48, pp 1952.Google Scholar
7. Dudley, R. and Ellington, C.P., Mechanics of forward flight in bumble bees II : Quasi-steady lift and power requirements, J Exp Biol, 1990, 148, pp 5358.Google Scholar
8. Tennekes, H. The Simple Science of Flight, 1997, MIT Press.Google Scholar
9. Zbikowski, R. Flapping wing autonomous micro air vehicles: Research programme outline, 1999, Paper 38, 14th International Conference, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, April 1999, Bristol, UK.Google Scholar
10. Delaurier, J.D. and Harris, J.M., A study of mechanical flapping wing flight, Aeronaut J, Oct 1993, 97, (968), pp 277286.Google Scholar
11. Gad-el-Hak, M., Micro air vehicles: Can they be controlled better?, J Aircr, 2001, 38, (3), pp 419429.Google Scholar
12. Michelson, R.C. and Reece, S., Update on flapping wing micro air vehicle research: Ongoing work to develop a flapping wing, crawling ‘entomopter’, 1998, Paper 30, 13th International Conference of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, Bristol, UK.Google Scholar
13. Ellington, C.P., The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight III : Kinematics, Phil Trans R Soc Lond, 1984, B305, pp 4178.Google Scholar
14. Willmott, A.P. and Ellington, C.P., Measuring the angle of attack of beating insect wings: robust three-dimensional reconstruction from two-dimensional images, J Exp Biol, 1997, 200, pp 26932704.Google Scholar
15. Willmot, A.P. and Ellington, C.P., The mechanics of flight in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta I: Kinematics of hovering and forward flight, J Exp Biol, 1997, 200, pp 27052722.Google Scholar
16. Lehmann, F.O. and Dickinson, M.H., The control of wing kinematics and flight forces in fruit flies (Drosophila spp), J Exp Biol, 1998, 201, pp 385401.Google Scholar
17. Tobalske, B.W., Peacock, W.L. and Dial, K.P., Kinematics of flap-bounding flight in the zebra finch over a wide range of speeds, J Exp Biol, 1999, 202, pp 17251739.Google Scholar
18. Pennycuick, C.J., Hedenstrom, A. and Rosen, M., Horizontal flight of a swallow (Hirundo rustica) observed in a wind tunnel, with a new method for directly measuring mechanical power, J Exp Biol, 2000, 203, pp 17551765.Google Scholar
19. Smith, M.J.C., Wilkin, P.J. and Williams, M.H., The advantages of an unsteady panel method in modeling the aerodynamic forces on rigid flapping wings, J Exp Biol, 1996, 199, pp 10731083.Google Scholar
20. Vest, M.S. Unsteady Aerodynamics and Propulsive Characteristics of Flapping Wings with Applications to Avian Flight, Doctoral dissertation, 1996, San Diego State University and University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
21. Liu, H. and Kawachi, K., A numerical study of insect flight, J Comp Physics, 1998, 146, pp 124156, Article No CP986019.Google Scholar
22. Van den Berg, C. and Ellington, C.P., The vortex wake of a hovering model hawkmoth, Phil Trans R Soc Lond, 1997, 352, pp 317328.Google Scholar
23. Bilo, D., Lauck, A. and Nachtigall, W., Measurements of linear body accelerations and calculations of instantaneous aerodynamic lift and thrust in a pigeon flying in a wind tunnel, Biona Report 3 — Bird Flight – Vogelflug, Nachtigall, W., (Ed), 1985, Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
24. Fejtek, I. and Nehera, J., Experimental study of flapping wing lift and propulsion, Aeronaut J, 1980, 84, pp 2833 Google Scholar
25. Vest, M.S. and Katz, J. Aerodynamic study of a flapping wing micro-UAV, 1999, AIAA99-0994, 37th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA.Google Scholar
26. Dickinson, M., The effects of wing rotation on unsteady aerodynamic performance at low Reynolds numbers, J Exp Biol, 1994, 192, pp 179206.Google Scholar
27. Sane, S.P. and Dickinson, M.H., The control of flight force by a flapping wing: lift and drag production, J Exp Biol, 2001, 204, pp 26072626.Google Scholar
28. Loh, K.H., An Investigation into the Hovering Flight Dynamics and Control of a Flapping Wing Micro Air Vehicle, 2003, PhD thesis, College of Aeronautics, Cranfield University.Google Scholar
29. Ellington, C.P. The novel aerodynamics of insect based flying machines, 1999, Paper 37, 14th International Conference of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, Bristol, UK Google Scholar
30. RobertsON, R.M. and Johnson, A.G., Collision avoidance of flying locusts: steering torques and behaviour, J Exp Biol, 1993, 183, pp 3560.Google Scholar
31. Rashid, T. The Flight Dynamics of a Full-Scale Ornithopter, 1995, MASc thesis, University of Toronto, Institute of Aerospace Studies.Google Scholar
32. Deng, X., Schenato, L. and Sastry, S. Hovering flight control of a micromechanical flying insect, 2001, Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Orlando, Florida, USA.Google Scholar
33. Schenato, L., Deng, X. and Wu, W.C., Sastry, S. Flight control system for a micromechanical flying insect: Architecture and implementation, 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Conference on Robotics & Automation, pp 16411646, Seoul, South Korea.Google Scholar
34. Schenato, L., Deng, X. ands Wu, W.C., Sastry, S, Virtual insect flight simulator (VIFS): A software testbed for insect flight, 2001, p 38853892, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Conference on Robotics & Automation, Seoul, South Korea.Google Scholar
35. McFarland, M.W. The Papers of Wilbur and Orville Wright — Volume One 1899-1905, 1953, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar