Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T11:31:52.372Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Aircraft parameter estimation using a new filtering technique based upon a neural network and Gauss-Newton method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

N. K. Peyada
Affiliation:
akg@iitk.ac.in, Department of aerospace Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, India
A. K. Ghosh
Affiliation:
akg@iitk.ac.in, Department of aerospace Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, India

Abstract

A new parameter estimation method based upon neural network is proposed. The method proposed here uses feed forward neural networks to establish a neural model that could be used to predict subsequent time histories given the suitable measured initial conditions. The proposed neural model would not represent a generic flight dynamic model. The neural model in this case develops point to point fitting of the input and the output data. Thus, it could at best be referred to as flight dynamic model in restricted sense. Gauss-Newton method is then used to obtain optimal values of the aerodynamic parameters by minimising a suitable defined error cost function. The method has been validated using longitudinal and lateral-directional flight data of various test aircraft. The results thus obtained were compared with those obtained through wind tunnel test, or those obtained using Maximum likelihood and/or Filter error methods. Unlike, most of the parameter estimation methods, the proposed method does not require a prior description of the model. It also bypasses the requirement of solving equations of motion. This feature of the proposed method may have special significance in handling flight data of an unstable aircraft.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2009 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hornik, K., Stinchcombe, M. and White, H., Multi-layer feed forward networks are universal approximators, Neural Networks, 1989, (2), 5, pp 359366.Google Scholar
2. Chen, S., Billings, S.A. and Grant, P.M., Nonlinear system identification using neural networks, Int J Control, 1990, (51), 6, pp 11911214.Google Scholar
3. Hess, R.A., On the use of back propagation with feed forward neural networks for aerodynamic estimation problem, AIAA Paper 93-3638s, August 1993.Google Scholar
4. Youseff, H.M., Estimation of aerodynamic coefficients using neural networks, AIAA Paper 93-3639, August 1993.Google Scholar
5. Bassapa, and Jategaonkar, R.V., Aspects of feed forward neural network modeling and its application to lateral-directional flight data, DLR-IB 111-95/30, Braunschweig, Germany, September 1995.Google Scholar
6. Linse, D.J. and Stengel, R.F., Identification of aerodynamic coefficients using computational neural networks, J Guid Cont and Dyn, 1993, (16), 6, pp 10181025.Google Scholar
7. Raol, J.R. and Jategaonkar, R.V., Aircraft parameter estimation using recurrent neural networks – a critical appraisal, AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, Baltimore, Maryland, US, August 7-9, 1995, Paper No AIAA 95-3504.Google Scholar
8. Raisinghani, S.C., Ghosh, A.K. and Kalra, P.K., Two new techniques for aircraft parameter estimation using neural networks, The Aeronaut J, January 1998, (102), 1011, pp 2529.Google Scholar
9. Ghosh, A.K., Raisinghani, S.C. and Khubchandani, S., Estimation of aircraft lateral-directional parameters using neural networks, J Aircr, November-December 1998, (35), 6, pp 876881.Google Scholar
10. Singh, S. and Ghosh, A.K., Parameter estimation from flight data of a missile using maximum likelihood and neural network method, AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit, Keystone, Colorado, US, August 21-24, 2006, Paper No AIAA 2006-6284.Google Scholar
11. Ghosh, A.K. and Raisinghani, S.C., Parameter estimation from flight data of an unstable aircraft using neural networks, J Aircr, 2002, (39), 5, pp 892894.Google Scholar
12. Jategaonkar, R.V., Flight vehicle system identification – A time domain methodology, AIAA Progress in Aeronautics and Astronautics, (216), AIAA, Reston, VA, August 2006.Google Scholar
13. Gauche, E., Coelho, J. and Teive, R.C.G., A mixed back-propa-gation/Marquardt-Levenberg algorithm for optimizing the distribution electrical systems operation, IEEE, 1999, pp 753758.Google Scholar
14 Hagan, M.T. and Menhaj, M.B., Training feed forward networks with the Marquardt algorithm, IEEE Transaction on Neural Networks, 1994, (6), 5, pp 989993.Google Scholar
15. Lee, C.C., Chung, P.C., Tsai, J.R. and Chang, C.I., Robust radial basis function neural networks, IEEE Transaction on System, Man and Cybernetics-Part B, (6), 29, December 1999, pp 674685.Google Scholar
16. Saha, A., Wu, C.L. and Tang, D.S., Approximation, dimension reduction and nonconvex optimization using linear superposition of Gaussians, IEEE Transaction on Computers, 1993, 42, pp 12221233.Google Scholar
17. Singh, S. and Ghosh, A.K., Estimation of lateral–directional parameters using neural networks based modified delta method, The Aeronaut J, September 2007, (111), 1123,.Google Scholar
18 Rangaranjan, R. and Viswanathan, S., Wind tunnel test results on a 1/5 scale HANSA model, NAL TR-01, December 1997, 1.Google Scholar
19. Hamel, P.G. and Jatejaonkar, R.V., The evolution of flight vehicle system identification, AGARD, DLR Germany, May 8-10, 1995.Google Scholar
20. Jategaonkar, R.V., Identification of the aerodynamic model of the DLR research aircraft ATTAS from flight test data DLR, September 1990, DLR-FB 90-40, Braunschweig, Germany Google Scholar