Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T01:39:05.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Aeroelastic Problems at High Speed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2016

Extract

A meeting of the Society was held in the Great Hall of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Great George Street, Westminster, S.W.1, on Thursday, 31st October, 1946, at which a paper on “Aeroelastic Problems at High Speed,” by Professor A. R. Collar, M.A., D.Sc, F.R.Ae.S., was presented and discussed. In the Chair, Dr. H. Roxbee Cox (Vice-President).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1947

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Collar, A. R.. The expanding domain of aeroelasticity. I.R.Ae.S., Aug. 1946.Google Scholar
2. Roxbee Cox, H., Pugsley, A. G.. Theory of loss of lateral control due to wing twisting. R. & M. 1506, Oct. 1932.Google Scholar
3. Pugsley, A. G., Roxbee Cox, H.. The aileron power of a monoplane. R. & M. 1640, April 1934.Google Scholar
4. Hirst, D. M.. Calculation of the critical reversal speeds of wings. R. & M. 1568, Sept. 1933.Google Scholar
5. Collar, A. R.. Semi-rigid representation of elastic cantilevers for torsion problems in aerodynamics. R.A.E.Report SME.3323; A.R.C8771. May 1945.Google Scholar
6. Collar, A. R., Broadbent, E. G.. The rolling power of an elastic wing, Part I: compressibility effects absent. R.A.E.Report SME.3322; A.R.C.8786. May 1945.Google Scholar
7. Glauert, H.. Theoretical relationships for an aerofoil with hinged flap. R. & M. 1095, April 1927.Google Scholar
8. Glauert, H.. The effect of compressibility on the lift of an aerofoil. R. & M. 1135, Sept. 1927.Google Scholar
9. Collar, A. R.. Theoretical forces and moments on a thin aerofoil with hinged flap at supersonic speeds. R. & M. 2004, Nov. 1943.Google Scholar
10. Broadbent, E. G., Collar, A. R.. The rolling power of an elastic wing, Part II: compressibility effects and results for supersonic speeds. R. A.E. Report SME.3347; A.R.C. 9239. Oct. 1945.Google Scholar
11. Victory, M.. The calculation of aileron reversal speed. R.A.E. Report SME.3279; A.R.C. 7486. Jan. 1944.Google Scholar
12. Collar, A. R., Grinsted, F.. The effects of structural flexibility of tailplane, elevator and fuselage on longitudinal control and stability. R. & M. 2010, Sept. 1942.Google Scholar
13. Collar, A. R., Jahn, H. A., Robinson, A., Broadbent, E. G.. German aircraft industry—aeroelasticity. B.I.O.S. Report No. 12, Item No. 25, 1946.Google Scholar
14. Collar, A. R., Victory, M.. Standards of structural stiffness for aeroplane tailplanes, elevators, and fuselages. R.A.E. Report SME.3251; A.R.C. 6818. June 1943.Google Scholar
15. Bisgood, P. L., Lyons, D. J.. Interim report on the flight measurement of aeroelastic distortion in relation to its effects on the control and longitudinal stability of a Mosquito aircraft. R.A.E. Report Aero 2125; A.R.C. 9671. Mar. 1946.Google Scholar
16. Gates, S. B.. Longitudinal stability and control. A simple exposition of the fundamentals employed in this aspect of design. “Aircraft Engineering,” Sept. 1940.Google Scholar
17. Gates, S. B.. A proposal for an elevator manoeuvrability criterion. R.A.E. Report Aero 1740; A.R.C. 5981. June 1942.Google Scholar
18. Gates, S. B., Lyon, H. M.. A continuation of longitudinal stability and control analysis. Part 1: general theory. R.A.E. Report Aero 1912; A.R.C. 7687. Feb. 1944.Google Scholar
19. Lyon, H. M., Ripley, J.. A general survey of the effects of flexibility of the fuselage, tail unit, and control systems on longitudinal stability and control. R.A.E. Report Aero 2065; A.R.C. 9015. July 1945.Google Scholar
20. Collar, A. R.. Note on virtual inertia and control surface flutter. R.A.E. Tech. Note SME.218; A.R.C. 7469. Feb. 1944.Google Scholar
21. Collar, A. R.. The prevention of flutter of spring tabs. R. & M. 2034, May 1943.Google Scholar
22. Collar, A. R.. Mass balancing of control surfaces and flutter prevention devices. A.R.C. 8091. July 1944.Google Scholar
23. Jahn, H. A., Buxton, G. H. L., Minhinnick, I. T.. Fuselage vertical bending—elevator flutter on the Typhoon. R.A.E. Report SME.3286; A.R.C. 7744. Mar. 1944.Google Scholar
24. Pugsley, A. G.. Control surface and wing stability problems. J.R.Ae.S., Nov. 1937.Google Scholar
25. Frazer, R. A.. Notes on the influence of Mach number on flutter and divergence of a tapered wing. A.R.C. 4949, Feb. 1941.Google Scholar
26. Collar, A. R., Broadbent, E. G., Puttick, E. B.. An elaboration of the criterion for wing torsional stiffness. R.A.E.Report SME.3357; A.R.C. 9540. Jan. 1946.Google Scholar
27. Collar, A. R.. Resistance derivatives of flutter theory, Part II: results for supersonic speeds. R.A.E. Report SME.3278; A.R.C. 7470. Dec. 1943.Google Scholar
28. Temple, G., Jahn, H. A.. Flutter at supersonic speeds, Part I: mid-chord derivative coefficients for a thin aerofoil at zero incidence. R.A.E. Report SME.3314;A.R.C8583. June 1945.Google Scholar
29. Collar, A. R.. Some problems in the design of sweptback wings. A.R.C. 9264. Jan. 1946.Google Scholar
30. Roxbee Cox, H.. A statistical method of investigating the relations between the elastic stiffnesses of aeroplane wings and wing-aileron flutter. R. & M. 1505, Oct. 1932.Google Scholar