Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T05:59:37.951Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aerodynamics – A discipline swept away?

Part of: RAeS Lanchester Lecture Papers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

C.-C. Rossow
C.-C. Rossow*
Affiliation:
cord.rossow@dlr.de, DLR, Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt, Institut für Aerodynamik und Strömungstechnik, Braunschweig, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This contribution is based on the Lanchester Lecture of the Royal Aeronautical Society held in Manchester, UK, in October 2009. The lecture reflected on further possible perspectives for aeronautical research, in particular with respect to aerodynamics. The air transport system of today has matured to very high performance and safety standards. However, due to the ongoing global developments of economy and ecology, new challenges have to be faced. Thus, the relevance of all engineering aeronautical disciplines contributing to the final aircraft configuration is now closely scrutinised, and especially aerodynamics is challenged whether any investment in further research is still justified. In this contribution, it is argued that, when carefully exploited, aerodynamics still offers a substantial technological perspective, well beyond the concepts for the next generation of aircraft as currently being pursued. As an example, the aerodynamics of a forward swept-wing are discussed and it is outlined that, when combining the transonic characteristics of a forward swept-wing with the advantages of natural laminar-flow, considerable improvements in efficiency may be gained. However, this potential may only be leveraged through a strategic, long-term orientation of fundamental and applied research.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 114 , Issue 1160 , October 2010 , pp. 599 - 609
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2010 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Lanchester, F.W., Aerodynamics, A. Constable & Co, 1907.Google Scholar
2. Sloof, J.W.. Subsonic transport aircraft – New challenges and opportu nities for aerodynamic research, 36th Lanchester Lecture, Royal16. Aeronautical Society, NLR-TP-2002-376, 2002.Google Scholar
3. Rubbert, P.. AIAA Wright Brothers Lecture – CFD and the Changing World of Airplane Design, ICAS Conference Proceedings ICAS-94-0.2, 19th ICAS Congress, Anaheim, USA, 18-23 September 1994.Google Scholar
4. Group of Personalities: European aeronautics: A vision for 2020, European Commission, http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/growth/aeronautics2020/en,2001.Google Scholar
5. Arndt, N., Egelhofer, R. and Rossow, C.-C.. Responding to the ACARE Challenges – Technologies and Concepts, 1st CEAS European Air and Space Conference, Berlin, Germany, 10-13 September, 2007.Google Scholar
6. Schrauf, G.. Status and perspectives of laminar-flow, Aeronaut J, 2005, 109, pp 639–644.Google Scholar
7. Henke, R.. A320 HLF fin flight test completed, Air & Space Europe, 1999, 1, (2), pp 76–79.Google Scholar
8. Braslow, A.L.. A history of suction-type laminar-flow control with emphasis on flight reserach, Monographs in Aerospace History, 13, NASA History Program, 1999.Google Scholar
9. Nicolai, L.M., Fundamentals of Aircraft Design, METS, 6520 Kingsland Court, San Jose, CA, 95120, 1975.Google Scholar
10. Hepperle, M.. MDO for forward swept-wings, KATnet II multi-disciplinary design and configuration optimization workshop, Braunschweig, Germany, 28-30 January 2008.Google Scholar
11. Redeker, G. and Wichmann, G.. Forward sweep – A favourableconcept for a laminar-flow wing, J Aircr, 1991, 28, pp 97–103.Google Scholar
12. Horstmann, K.H.. Wing design for laminar-flow, AIAA 38th Fluid Dynamics Conference, Seattle, USA, 23-26 June 2008.Google Scholar
13. Skow, A.M. et al Modern fighter aircraft design for high angle-of-attack manoeuvering, in AGARD-Lecture series high angle-of-attack aerodynamics, AGARD-LS-121, pp 4–14, 1982.Google Scholar
14. Ortmann, J. and Hepperle, M.. Forward swept-wing design study, DLR-IB, No. 124-2007/905, 2007.Google Scholar
15. Greenblatt, D. and Wygnanski, I.J.. The control of flow separation by periodic exitation, Progress in aerospace sciences, 2000, 36, pp 487–545.Google Scholar
16. Gölling, B. and Bieler, H.. German R&T activities for active flow control for high lift/low speed, KATnet II Conference on Key Aerodynamic Technologies, Bremen, Germany, 12-14 May 2009.Google Scholar
17. Crowther, B.. Flow control fallacies a review of common pitfalls in flow control research, KATnet II Conference on Key Aerodynamic Technologies, Bremen, Germany, 12-14 May 2009.Google Scholar
18. Casper, M.; Scholz, P. and Radespiel, R.. Separation control on an aerofoil with vortex generator jets, KATnet II Conference on Key Aerodynamic Technologies, Bremen, Germany, 12-14 May 2009.Google Scholar
19. Birkemeyer, J.; Rosemann, H. and Stanewsky, E.. Shock control on a swept-wing, Aerospace science and technology, 2000, 4, (3), pp 147–156.Google Scholar
20. Bechert, D.W., Bruse, M. and Hage, W.. Experiments with three-dimensional riblets as an idealized model of shark skin, Experiments in Fluids, 1999, 28, (5), pp 403–412.Google Scholar
21. Sturzebecher, D. and Nitsche, W.. Active cancellation of Tollmien-Schlichting instabilities on a wing using multi-channel sensor actuator systems, Int J Heat and Fluid Flow, 2003, 24, (4), pp 572–583.Google Scholar
22. Seitz, A.. Freiflug-Experimente zum Übergang laminar-turbulent in einer Tragflügelgrenzschicht, DLR-FB-2007-01, Dissertation TU Braunschweig, 2007.Google Scholar
23. Horstmann, K.H.. Drag reduction by flow control, ECCOMAS CFD Conference, 2006, Egmont aan Zee, The Netherlands, 5-8 September 2006.Google Scholar
24. Rossow, C.-C. and Kroll, N., Numerical simulation – Complementing theory and experiment as the third pillar in aerodynamics, Hermann Schlichting – 100 years scientific colloquium celebrating the anniversary of his birthday, Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multi-disciplinary Design, 2009, 102, pp 39–58, Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
25. Moore, G.E.. Cramming more c omponents onto integrated circuits, Electronica, 34, 1965.Google Scholar