Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

The aerodynamic challenges of aeroengine gas-turbine combustion systems

  • J. J. McGuirk (a1)

Abstract

The components of an aeroengine gas-turbine combustor have to perform multiple tasks – control of external and internal air distribution, fuel injector feed, fuel/air atomisation, evaporation, and mixing, flame stabilisation, wall cooling, etc. The ‘rich-burn’ concept has achieved great success in optimising combustion efficiency, combustor life, and operational stability over the whole engine cycle. This paper first illustrates the crucial role of aerodynamic processes in achieving these performance goals. Next, the extra aerodynamic challenges of the ‘lean-burn’ injectors required to meet the ever more stringent NO x emissions regulations are introduced, demonstrating that a new multi-disciplinary and ‘whole system’ approach is required. For example, high swirl causes complex unsteady injector aerodynamics; the threat of thermo-acoustic instabilities means both aerodynamic and aeroacoustic characteristics of injectors and other air admission features must be considered; and high injector mass flow means potentially strong compressor/combustor and combustor/turbine coupling. The paper illustrates how research at Loughborough University, based on complementary use of advanced experimental and computational methods, and applied to both isolated sub-components and fully annular combustion systems, has improved understanding and identified novel ideas for combustion system design.

Copyright

Corresponding author

References

Hide All
1. Mosier, S.A. and Pierce, R.M. Advanced combustion systems for stationary gas turbine engines: Vol. 1 – review and preliminary evaluation, US Environmental Protection Agency Report No. EPA-600/7-80-0171, 1980.
2. http://www.rolls-royce.com/civil/products/largeaircraft/trent_700/
3. Mongia, H.C. GE Aviation low emissions combustion technology evolution, SAE Paper 2007-01-3924, AeroTech Congress and Exposition, Los Angeles, USA, September 2007.
4. McKinney, R.G., Sepulveda, D., Sowa, W. and Cheung, A.K. The Pratt and Whitney TALON X low emissions combustor: revolutionary results with evolutionary technology, AIAA-2007-386, 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, USA, January 2007.
5. Klein, A. Characteristics of combustor diffusers, Prog in Aerospace Sci, 31, 1995, pp 171271.
6. Fishenden, C.R. and Stevens, S.J. Performance of annular combustor dump diffusers, J Aircr, 1977, 14, pp 6067.
7. Barker, A.G. and Carrotte, J.F. Influence of compressor exit conditions on combustor annular diffusers, Part I: diffuser performance, J Prop Power, 17, 2001, pp 678686.
8. Barker, A.G. and Carrotte, J.F. Influence of compressor exit conditions on combustor annular diffusers, Part II: fow redistribution, J Prop & Power, 2001, 17, pp 687694.
9. Lefebvre, A.H. Gas-turbine Combustion, 2nd ed, Taylor and Francis 1999.
10. European Aeronautics: A vision for 2020, ACARE Report, www.acare4europe.com, 2001.
11. Flightpath 2050: Europe’s vision for aviation, Rep of High Level Group on Aviation Res, 2011.
12. Rayleigh, , The explanation of certain acoustical phenomena, Nature, 1878, 18, pp 319320.
13. Lieuwen, T. and Zinn, B.T. The role of equivalence ratio oscillations in driving combustion instabilities in low NO x gas-turbines, Proc of the Combustion Institute, 1998, 27, pp 18091816.
14. Dowling, A.P. and Stow, S.R. Acoustic analysis of gas turbine combustors, AIAA J Propulsion and Power, 2003, 19, pp 751764.
15. Spencer, A. and McGuirk, J.J. LDA measurements of feed annulus effects on combustor liner port flows, ASME J Fluids Eng, 2001, 123, pp 219228.
16. McGuirk, J.J. and Spencer, A. Coupled & uncoupled CFD prediction of the characteristics of jets from combustor air admission ports, J Eng for Gas Turb & Power, 2001, 123, pp 327332.
17. Midgley, K, Spencer, A. and McGuirk, J.J. Unsteady flow structures in radial swirler fed fuel injectors, ASME J Eng for Gas Turbines and Power, 2005, 127, pp 755764.
18. Spencer, A., McGuirk, J.J. and Midgley, K. Vortex breakdown in swirling fuel injector flows, ASME J Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2008, 130, pp 021503-1-8.
19. Cheng, L., Dianat, M., Spencer, A. and McGuirk, J.J. Validation of LES predictions of scalar mixing in high swirl fuel injector flows, Flow Turbulence and Combustion, 2012, 88, pp 146168.
20. Denman, P.A. Aerodynamic evaluation of a double annular combustion system, ASME GT-2002-30465, 2002.
21. Ferzinger, J. and Peric, M. Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics, Springer, Berlin, Germany 1999.
22. Anand, M.S., Zhu, J., Connor, C. and Razdan, M.K. Combustor flow analysis using an advanced finite-volume design system, ASME 99-GT-273, 1999.
23. Malecki, R.E. and Rhie, C.M. McKinney, R.G., Ouyang, H., Syed, S.A., Colket, M.B. and Madabushi, R.V. Application of an advanced CFD-based analysis system to the PW6000 Combustor to optimise exit temperature distribution – Part I: Description and validation of the analysis tool, ASME 2001-GT-62, 2001.
24. Poinsot, T. and Veynante, D. Theoretical & Numerical Combustion, RT Edwards, North Yorkshire, 2005.
25. Selle, L., Lartigue, G., Poinsot, T., Koch, R. Schildmacher, K-U., Krebs, W., Prade, B., Kaufmann, P., and Veynante, D. Compressible Large Eddy Simulation of turbulent combustion in complex geometry on unstructured meshes, Combustion and Flame, 2004, 137, pp 489505.
26. Menon, S. and Patel, N. Sub-Grid modelling for simulation of spray combustion in large-scale combustors, AIAA J, 2006, 44, pp 709723.
27. Choi, D. and Merkle, C.L. Application of time iterative schemes to incompressible flow, AIAA J, 1985, 23, pp 15181524.
28. Choi, D. and Merkle, C.L. The application of pre-conditioning in viscous fows, J Comp Phys, 1993, 105, pp 207223.
29. Acharya, S., Baliga, B.R., Karki, K., Murthy, J.Y., Prakash, C. and Vanka, S.P. Pressure-based finite-volume methods in CFD, J Heat Transfer, 2007, 129, pp 407424.
30. Karki, K.C. and Patankar, S.V. Pressure-based calculation procedure for viscous flows at all speeds in arbitrary configurations, AIAA J, 1989, 27, pp 11671173.
31. McGuirk, J.J. and Page, G.J. Shock capturing using a pressure-correction method, AIAA J, 1990, 27, pp 17511757.
32. Gunasekaran, B. and McGuirk, J.J. Mildly-compressible pressure-based CFD methodology for acoustic propagation and absorption prediction, ASME GT2011-45316, 2011.
33. Pope, S.B. Turbulent Flow, Cambridge University Press, 2000.
34. Walker, A.D., Carrotte, J.F., Peacock, G.L., Spencer, A. and McGuirk, J.J. Experimental study of the unsteady aerodynamics at the compressor/combustor interface of a lean burn combustion system, AIAA 2013-3603 49th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, San Jose, California, USA, July 2013.
35. Spencer, A. and Adumitroaie, V. Large Eddy Simulation of impinging jets in a cross-flow, ASME GT2003-38756, 2003.
36. Sagaut, P., Large Eddy Simulation for Incompressible Flows, 2nd ed, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2002.
37. Menzies, K. Rolls-Royce, Personal Communication, 2013.
38. Walker, A.D., Carrotte, J.F. and McGuirk, J.J. Compressor/diffuser/combustor aerodynamic interactions in lean module combustors, ASME J Eng for Gas Turbines and Power, 2008, 130, pp 01150401-011504-08.
39. Walker, A.D., Carrotte, J.F. and McGuirk, J.J. The influence of dump gap on external combustor aerodynamics at high fuel injector flow rates, ASME J Eng For Gas Turbines and Power, 2009, 131, pp 03150601-031506-10.
40. Barker, A.G., Carrotte, J.F., Luff, J. and McGuirk, J.J. 2003, Design of an Integrated OGV/Diffuser System, EU FP5 project LOPOCOTEP Final Report No.GRD1-2000-25062, 2003.
41. Walker, A.D. Carrotte, J.F. and McGuirk, J.J. Enhanced external aerodynamic performance of a generic combustor using an integrated OGV/pre-diffuser technique, ASME J Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2007, 129, pp 8087.
42. Zierer, T. Experimental investigation of the flow in diffusers behind an axial flow compressor, ASME 93-GT-347, 1993.
43. Carrotte, J.F., Young, K.F. and Stevens, S.J. Measurements of the flowfield within a compressor outlet guide vane passage, ASME J Turbomachinery, 1995, 117, pp 2937.
44. Howard, J.H.G., Henseler, H.J. and Thornton-Trump, A.B. Performance and flow regimes for annular diffusers, ASME 67-WA/FE-21, 1967.
45. Midgley, K., Dianat, M., Spencer, A., Yang, Z. and McGuirk, J.J. Scalar measurements and unsteady simulations in high swirl confned flows, Proc of 9th International Gas Turbine Conference, Tokyo, Japan, December 2007.
46. Dunham, D., Spencer, A., McGuirk, J.J. and Dianat, M. Comparison of unsteady Reynolds averaged Navier Stokes and Large Eddy Simulation CFD Methodologies for air swirl fuel injectors, ASME J Eng For Gas Turbines & Power, 2009, 131, pp 0115021-015502-8.
47. Dianat, M., McGuirk, J.J., Fokeer, S. and Spencer, A. LES of unsteady vortex aerodynamics in complex geometry gas-turbine fuel injectors, Proc. of ETMM10, Spain, 2014.
48. Fokeer, S. and Spencer, A. PIV measurements for Trent rich burn fuel injectors, Loughborough University, Department of Aero & Auto Eng Internal Report TT08R03, 2008.
49. Jeong, J. and Hussein, F. On the Identification of a Vortex, J Fluid Mech, 1995, 285, pp 6994.
50. Rupp, J., Carrotte, J.F. and Spencer, A. Interaction between the acoustic pressure fuctuations and the unsteady flow-field through circular holes, ASME J Eng For Gas Turbines & Power, 132, 2010, pp 0615001 to 06150-09.
51. Su, J., Rupp, J., Garmory, A. and Carrotte, J.F. Measurements and CFD predictions of the acoustic impedance of plenum-fed orifces, J Sound and Vibration, submitted 2014.
52. Apte, S.V., Gorokhovski, M. and Moin, P. LES of atomizing spray with stochastic modelling of secondary breakup, Int J Multiphase Flow, 2003, 29, pp 15031522.
53. Xiao, F., Dianat, M. and McGuirk, J.J. Large Eddy Simulation of liquid jet primary breakup in air crossflow, AIAA J, 2013, 51, pp 28782893.
54. Elshamy, O.M., Experimental investigations of steady and dynamic behavior of transverse liquid jets, PhD Thesis, University of Cincinnati, USA, 2007.
55. Ford, C.L. Novel Lean Burn Injector Designs For Improved Flow Uniformity, PhD Thesis, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK, 2013.
56. Wilfert, G., Sieber, J., Rolt, A., Baker, A. Touyeras, A. and Colantuoni, S. New Environmentally Friendly Aero Engine core Concepts(NEWACC), ISABE 2007-1120, 2007.
57. Bock, S., Horn, W. and Sieber, J. Active Core – a key technology for more environmentally friendly engines being investigated under the NEWACC program, 26th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences (ICAS), 2008.
58. Jones, S.M. and Paxson, D.E. Potential benefits to commercial propulsion systems from pressure gain combustion, AIAA-2013-3623, 49th AIAA/ASME/SAE Joint Propulsion Conference, 2013.
59. Winterberger, E. and Shepherd, J.E. Introduction to – To the question of energy use of detonation combustion by Ya Zel’dovich, AIAA J Prop & Power, 2006, 22, pp 586592.
60. Offord, T., Miller, R.J., Dawson, J.A., Heffer, J.J.H., Mason, S. and Taylor, M. Improving the performance of a valveless pulse combustor using unsteady fuel injection, AIAA 2008-120, 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2008.
61. Fernelius, M., Gorrell, S., Hoke, J. and Schauer, F. Effect of periodic pressure pulses on axial turbine performance, AIAA 2013-3687, 49th AIAA/ASME/SAE Joint Propulsion Conference, 2013.
62. Ward, C.M. and Miller, R.J. Performance analysis of an ejector enhanced pressure gain combustion gas turbine, AIAA 2012-0772, 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2013.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

The aerodynamic challenges of aeroengine gas-turbine combustion systems

  • J. J. McGuirk (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.