Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T05:55:36.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Advances in aeroacoustic wind tunnel testing techniques for aircraft noise research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

J. Williams
Affiliation:
Aerodynamics Department, Royal Aircraft Establishment
T. A. Holbeche
Affiliation:
Aerodynamics Department, Royal Aircraft Establishment

Extract

To ensure meaningful evaluation and prediction of configuration and flight effects on aircraft noise generation and propagation, reliable representation and measurement of relevant aerodynamic flow conditions as well as of acoustic characteristics must be possible. Acoustic wind tunnels, with models mounted in a quiet test section airstream surrounded by an anechoic working chamber, have now been established as primary tools for noise-model research work and should next be exploited also for the direct support of specific quiet aircraft projects. The special advantages of such tunnels in ensuring a more sheltered and controlled environment than outdoor mobile-model facilities and flight testing include capability of continuous operation, repeatable test conditions, high productivity, good measurement accuracy, testing flexibility, and the precise alleviation of reflections from neighbouring surfaces. Of course the recent experience on noise testing under forward speed conditions and on associated techniques is still very limited at both model scale and full scale, as compared with extensive and continuous aerodynamic testing over half a century. However, many of the problem areas associated with subsonic tunnel design and application for noise-model testing, as identified over five years ago, have now been clarified. Also, the special treatments or limitations involved have become quantifiable in many respects, as discussed later under the convenient main headings of tunnel test section requirements (section 2), tunnel circuit design (section 3), special measurement and analysis techniques (section 4) and model scale simulation (section 5).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1979 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Armstrong, F. W. and Williams, J. Some UK-Government Establishment research towards quieter aircraft. JS & Vib, Vol 47, No 2, pp 207236, 1976.Google Scholar
2. Williams, J., et al. Aerodynamic noise. AGARD LS-80, March 1977.Google Scholar
3. Holbeche, T. A. and Williams, J. Acoustic considerations for noise experiments at model-scale in subsonic wind tunnels. RAE Technical Report 72155, July 1972.Google Scholar
4. Ffowcs Williams, J. E., et al. Noise mechanisms. AGARD CP 131, March 1974.Google Scholar
5. Brownell, W. F. An anechoic test facility design for the Naval Ship Research and Development Center, Carderock (USA). NSRDC Rep 2924, September 1968.Google Scholar
6. Foley, W. and Paterson, R. W. Development of the United Technologies Research Center acoustic research tunnel and associated test techniques. AGARD CP-174, Paper 7, June 1975.Google Scholar
7. Hickey, D. H. and Kelly, M. W. Aspects of a largescale, subsonic wind tunnel design for propulsion noise research. AIAA Paper 73-1279, November 1973.Google Scholar
8. Amiet, R. K. Correction of open-jet wind tunnel measurements for shear layer refraction. AIAA Paper 75-532, March 1975.Google Scholar
9. Beranek, L. L. and Schultz, T. J. Noise and vibration control. McGraw Hill, 1971.Google Scholar
10. Taylor, K. A transformation of the acoustic equations with implications for wind tunnel and low-speed flight tests. RAE Technical Report 77109, July 1977.Google Scholar