Hostname: page-component-76dd75c94c-ccc76 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T08:23:43.726Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thermomechanical behaviour of a damaged thermal protection system: experimental correlation and influence of hypersonic flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2016

W. H. Ng ,
P. P. Friedmann ,
A. M. Waas  and
J. J. McNamara
W. H. Ng
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
P. P. Friedmann
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
A. M. Waas
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
J. J. McNamara
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper describes a combined experimental and numerical study on damaged and undamaged space shuttle tile thermal protection system (TPS). The principal objective of the study is to determine its thermomechanical behaviour and assess the structural integrity of the TPS. The TPS tile specimens are subjected to a temperature profile corresponding to the thermal loads of the Access to Space reference vehicle. Experiments are conducted in a vacuum chamber that allows re-entry static pressure to be simulated. Temperatures on the top and bottom surfaces of the specimen, and the strains in the underlying structure are recorded. The experimental results are used to guide the development of a refined finite element model, which is subsequently used to simulate the interactions between the high speed external flow past the cavity that represents damage. Using this model, the relative effects of damage on the thermal protection capability and the induced thermal stresses are determined by comparing the response of the damaged configurations with the undamaged configuration. Damage increases the thermal loads and significantly reduces the radiation heat loss from the surface of the tile, resulting in elevated temperatures. Results indicate that damage can raise the maximum temperature in the tile to values that exceed its melting point.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 115 , Issue 1164 , February 2011 , pp. 69 - 82
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Shideler, J.L., Webb, G.L. and Pittman, C.M. Verification tests of durable thermal protection system concepts, J Spacecraft and Rockets, 22, (6), November-December 1985.Google Scholar
2. Ng, W.H., Friedmann, P.P. and Waas, A.M. Thermomechanical behaviour of a damaged thermal protection system: finite element simulation, accepted to appear in ASCE J Aerospace Engineering, 2011. See also, Ref. 11, listed here.Google Scholar
3. Ng, W.H., Friedmann, P.P and Waas, A.M. Thermomechanical analysis of a damaged thermal protection system, AIAA Paper No. 2005-2301, 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Austin, TX, USA, April 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Ng, W.H., Friedmann, P.P and Waas, A.M. Thermomechanical analysis of a thermal protection system with defects and heat shorts, AIAA Paper No. 2006-2212, 47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and zMaterials Conference, Newport RI, USA, May 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Nestler, D.E., Saydah, A.R. and Auxer, W.L. Heat transfer to steps and cavities in hypersonic turbulent flow, AIAA Paper No. 68-673, AIAA Fluid and Plasma Dynamics Conference, Los Angeles, CA, USA, June 1968.Google Scholar
6. Soltani, S. and Hillier, R. An experimental and computational study of hypersonic cavity flows, AIAA paper No 94-0766, 32nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno NV, USA, January 1994.Google Scholar
7. Daryabeigi, K., Knutson, J.R. and Sikora, J.G. Thermal vacuum facility for testing thermal protection systems, NASA Technical Memorandum 2002-211734, June 2002.Google Scholar
8. Myers, D.E., Martin, C.J. and Blosser, M.L. Parametric weight comparison of advanced metallic, Ceramic Tile, and Ceramic Blanket Thermal Protection Systems, NASA TM-2000-210289, 2000.Google Scholar
9. Thermal Protection Systems Expert (TPSX) Material Properties Database V4, tpsx.arc.nasa.gov.Google Scholar
10. Abaqus/Standard User’s Manual Version 6.4, Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen, Pawtucket, RI, USA.Google Scholar
11. Ng, W.H., Friedmann, P.P. and Waas, P.P. Thermomechanical behaviour of a thermal protection system with different levels of damage – experiments and simulation, AIAA Paper No 2007-2272, 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Honolulu, HI, USA, 2007.Google Scholar
12. Christiansen, E.L. and Friesen, L. Penetration equations for thermal protection material, Int J Impact Engineering, 20, (153–164), 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Myers, D.E., Martin, C.J. and Blosser, M.L. Parametric weight comparison of advanced metallic, Ceramic Tile, and Ceramic Blanket Thermal Protection Systems, NASA Technical Memorandum 2000-210289, June 2000.Google Scholar
14. Tong, P. and Pian, T.H.H. On convergence of the finite element methods for problems with singularity, Int J Solids and Structures, 9:313–321, 1973.Google Scholar
15. Wang, S.S. and Yuan, F.K., A singular hybrid Finite element analysis of boundary-layer stresses in composite laminates, Int J Solids and Structures, 1983, 19, (9), pp 825–837.Google Scholar
16. Everhart, J.L., Alter, S.J., Merski, N.R., Wood, W.A. and Prabhu, R.K., Pressure Gradient Effects on Hypersonic Cavity Flow Heating, AIAA Paper No 2006-185, 44th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, January 2006.Google Scholar
17. Pulsonetti, M.V. and Wood, W. Computational aerothermodynamic assessment of Space Shuttle orbiter tile damage – open cavities, AIAA Paper No 2005-4679, 38th AIAA Thermophysics Conference, June 2005.Google Scholar
18. Krist, S.L., Biedron, R.T. and Runsey, C.L. CFL3D User’s Manual (Version 5.0), NASA, RM 1998-208444, 1997.Google Scholar
19. Sawyer, J.W. Mechanical properties of the Shuttle Orbiter thermal protection system strain isolator pad, J Spacecraft and Rockets, May-June 1984, 21, (3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Callister, W.D. Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction, John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA, 2003, Pg S-349.Google Scholar