Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T18:45:15.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preview of the 75th Anniversary of aerospace engineering at the University of Bristol online collection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2023

Jonathan E Cooper*
Affiliation:
RAEng Airbus Sir George White Professor of Aerospace Engineering University of Bristol

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aplin, K. et al. 75th Anniversary of Aerospace Engineering at the University of Bristol, accepted for publication in SCITECH 2023.Google Scholar
Severn, R.T., The Development of the Faculty of Engineering in the University of Bristol 1909–2009.Google Scholar
A Frequency Domain Approach for Reduced Order Transonic Aerodynamic Modelling. Gaitonde, A., Jones, D.P. and Cooper, J.E., 2022, 126, pp 14471473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Two-dimensional Conservative Spacetime Methods for Unsteady Simulation of Arbitrary Motion, Ederra, F. et al, 2022, 126, pp 17711800.Google Scholar
Crabtree, L. The Compressible Laminar Boundary Layer on a Yawed Infinite Wing. Aeronautical Quarterly, 1954, 5, (2), pp 85100. doi: 10.1017/S0001925900001104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, C. and Fiddes, S. A cell-vertex upwind scheme for two-dimensional supersonic Euler flows. The Aeronautical Journal, 1997, 101, (1005), pp 199208. doi: 10.1017/S0001924000066379Google Scholar
Rezgui, D. Arroyo, I.H. and Theunissen, R. Model for sectional leading-edge vortex lift for the prediction of rotating samara seeds performance: The Aeronautical Journal, 2020, 124, (1278), pp 12361261, 1 August 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaitonde, A. and Jones, D. The use of pulse responses and system reduction for 2D unsteady flows using the Euler equations. The Aeronautical Journal, 106, (1063), pp 483492. doi: 10.1017/S0001924000092332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collar, A. The Expanding Domain of Aeroelasticity. The Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, 1946, 50, (428), 613636. doi: 10.1017/S0368393100120358 George Taylor Gold Medal 1947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Second Lanchester Memorial Lecture: Aeroelasticity—Retrospect and Prospect Part of: RAeS Lanchester Lecture Papers A. R. Collar, The Aeronautical Journal, 63, (577), January 1959.Google Scholar
Simpson, A. The solution of large flutter problems on small computers, The Aeronautical Journal, 1984, 88, (874), pp 128140. doi: 10.1017/S0001924000020352.Google Scholar
Castrichini, A. Siddaramaiah, V. Hodigere; Calderon, D.E.; Cooper, J.E.; Wilson, T. and Lemmens, Y. Preliminary investigation of use of flexible folding wing tips for static and dynamic load alleviation, The Aeronautical Journal, 2017, 121, (1235), pp 7394, January 1, 2017 RAeS Bronze Medal for Written Paper (2018).Google Scholar
Krupa, E.P. Cooper, J.E.; Pirrera, A. and Nangia, R. Improved aerostructural performance via aeroservoelastic tailoring of a composite wing, The Aeronautical Journal, 2018, 122, (1255), pp 14421474, September 1, 2018 RAeS Gold Medal for Written Paper (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowson, M. Progress towards quieter civil helicopters. The Aeronautical Journal, 1992, 96, (956), pp 209223. doi: 10.1017/S0001924000050508 Busk Prize, 1992.Google Scholar
Steady and unsteady aerodynamic loading of a NACA 16-616 aerofoil in a uniform flow J.A. Branch et al, 2022.Google Scholar
Thill, C., Etches, J., Bond, I,. Potter K and Weaver P. (2008). Morphing Skins. The Aeronautical Journal, 112, (1129), pp 117139. doi: 10.1017/S0001924000003687 Most cited paper in The Aeronautical Journal.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, K., Wisnom, M., Lowson, M. and Adams, R., Innovative approaches to composite structures. The Aeronautical Journal, 1988, 102, (1012), pp 107111. doi: 10.1017/S0001924000065659Google Scholar
Comparison of Structural Model reduction methods applied to a large deformation wing box, R.R. Medeiros et al, 2021, 125, (1292), pp 16871709.Google Scholar
Richardson, T., Lowenberg, M., Jones, C. and Dubs, A. Dynamic gain scheduled control of a Hawk scale model. The Aeronautical Journal, 2007, 111, (1121), pp 461469. doi: 10.1017/S0001924000004723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Improvements in Learning to Control Perched Landings, Fletcher, L. et al, 2022, 126, pp 11031123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landing Gear Ground Manoeuvre Statistics from Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast Transponder Data J. Hoole et al. 2021, 125, (1293), pp 19421976. Young Persons Written Paper Prize 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar