Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T20:56:25.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An overview of experiments on the dynamic sensitivity of MAVs to turbulence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

A. Watkins ,
M. Thompson ,
M. Shortis ,
R. Segal ,
M. Abdulrahim  and
J. Sheridan
A. Watkins
Affiliation:
simon@rmit.edu.au
M. Thompson
Affiliation:
RMIT University, Australia
M. Shortis
Affiliation:
RMIT University, Australia
R. Segal
Affiliation:
RMIT University, Australia
M. Abdulrahim
Affiliation:
University of Florida, Florida, USA
J. Sheridan
Affiliation:
Monash University, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Aspects of the turbulent wind environment Micro Air Vehicles (MAVs) experience when flying outdoors were replicated in a large wind tunnel. An overview of the facility, instrumentation and initial flight tests is given. Piloting inputs and aircraft accelerations were recorded on fixed and rotary wing MAVs and for some tests, measurements of the approach flow (u,v,w sampled at 1,250Hz at four laterally disposed upstream locations) were made. The piloting aim was to hold straight and level flight in the 12m wide × 4m high × ~50m long test section, while flying in a range of turbulent conditions. The Cooper-Harper rating system showed that a rotary craft was less sensitive to the effects of turbulence compared to the fixed wing craft and that while the fixed wing aircraft was relatively easy to fly in smooth air, it became extremely difficult to fly under high turbulence conditions. The rotary craft, while more difficult to fly per. se., did not become significantly harder to fly in relatively high turbulence levels. However the rotary craft had a higher mass and MOI than the fixed wing craft and further work is planned to understand the effects of these differences.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 114 , Issue 1158 , August 2010 , pp. 485 - 492
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2010 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Burger, K., Micro air vehicle demo approaching, Janes Defence Weekly, Janes Publications, 12 September 2001, 36, (14), p 6.Google Scholar
2. Holmes, J.D., Wind Loading of Structures, Spon Press, London, 2001.Google Scholar
3. Sutton, O.G., Micrometeorology, McGraw-Hill Books, New York, USA, 1953.Google Scholar
4. Van der Hoven, I., Power spectrum of horizontal wind speed in the frequency range from 0·0007 to 900 cycles per hour, J Meteorology, 1957, 14, pp 160–164.Google Scholar
5. Lawson, T.V., Wind Effects on Buildings, in 2 volumes, Applied Science Publishers, London, UK, 1980.Google Scholar
6. Watkins, S., Milbank, J., Loxton, B.J. and Melbourne, W.H., Atmospheric winds and their effects on Micro Air Vehicles, AIAA J, November 2006, 11, (44), pp 2591–2600.Google Scholar
7. Milbank, J., Loxton, B.J., Watkins, S. and Melbourne, W.H., Replication of atmospheric conditions for the purpose of testing MAVs, Final Report, USAF Project No: AOARD 05-4075, RMIT University, 2005. Available gratis via http://mams.rmit.edu.au/cibbi0b6g34o.pdf and http://mams.rmit.edu.au/nqjhdfdjn29o.pdf Google Scholar
8. Etkin, B, Turbulent wind and Its effect on flight, AIAA J Aircr, May 1981, 18, (5), pp 327–345.Google Scholar
9. Watkins, S., Loxton, B., Milbank, J., Melbourne, W.H. and Abdulrahim, M., Modelling the atmospheric boundary layer in a large wind tunnel for MAV development 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 7-10 January 2008, Reno, NV, USA.Google Scholar
10. Watkins, S., Saunders, J.W., Hoffmann, P.H. and Holmes, J.D., Measurements of turbulence experienced by moving vehicles, Part 1. introduction and turbulence intensity, J Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1995, 57, (1), pp 1– 17.Google Scholar
11. Watkins, S., Loxton, B., Millbank, J., Melbourne, W.H. and Abdulrahim, M., The turbulent flight environment of MAVs – Flight environment measurements and tunnel replication, 2nd European Conference for Aerospace Sciences (EUCASS, Brussels, Belgium, 1-6 July, 2007.Google Scholar
12. Shortis, M.R. and Snow, W.L., Videometric tracking of wind tunnel aerospace models at NASA Langley Research Centre. The Photogrammetric Record, 1997, 15, (85), pp 673–689.Google Scholar
13. Watkins, S., Development of a Micro Air Vehicle, Aeronaut J, February 2003, 107, (1068).Google Scholar
14. Abdulrahim, M., Watkins, S., Segal, R. and Sheridan, J., Dynamic sensitivity to atmospheric turbulence of a fixed-wing UAV with varying configuration, presented at the AIAA guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, 10-13 August, Chicago, Il, USA, 2009 and submitted to the AIAA J Aircr.Google Scholar