Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T09:52:20.164Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

X-ray Multiaxial Stress Analysis on Materials with Stress Gradient by Use of Cos Ψ Function

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Yasuo Yoshioka
Affiliation:
Musashi Institute of Technology 1 Tamazutsumi, SetagayaTokyo 158Japan
Toshihiko Sasaki
Affiliation:
The Institute of Vocational Training 1960 Aihara, SagamiharaKanagawa 229, Japan
Makoto Kuramoto
Affiliation:
The Institute of Vocational Training 1960 Aihara, SagamiharaKanagawa 229, Japan
Get access

Abstract

When X-ray residual stresses are determined taking into account the stress gradients within the penetration depth of X-rays, three assumptions have usually been made; 1) the stress gradient is linear in respect to the depth from the specimen surface, 2) the penetration depth of X-rays is a function of Sin2ψ and 3) the strain measured by X-rays corresponds to the average strain weighted on the intensity of the diffracted X-rays. However, the assumption of the penetration depth of X-rays is the reason we sometimes observed noticeable errors which depend on the combination of stress components in the stress tensor.

Type
VIII. X-Ray Strain and Stress Determination
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Lods, W. und Peiter, A., Numerik rontgenographischer Eigenspannungsanlysen oberflachennaher Schichten, HTM, 32,235(1977).Google Scholar
2. Wagner, C.N.J., Boldrick, M.S. and Perez-Mendez, V., A Phi-Psi- Diffractometer for Residual Stress Measurement, Adv. X-Ray Anal., 26, 275(1983).Google Scholar
3. Sasaki, T., Kuramoto, M. and Yoshioka, Y., X-Ray Multiaxial Stress Analysis Taking Account of Stress Gradient, Adv. X-Ray Anal., 27, 121(1984).Google Scholar
4. Dolle, H., The Influence of Multiaxial Stress States, Stress Gradients and Elastic Anisotropy on the Evaluation of (Residual) Stresses by X-Rays, J. Appl. Cryst., 12, 489(1979).Google Scholar
5. Yoshioka, Y., Hasegawa, K. and Mochiki, K., A Versatile X-Ray Stress Analyzer Using a Position Sensitive Detector, Adv. X-Ray Anal., 24, 149(1981).Google Scholar
6. Iwanaga, S., Namikawa, H. and Aoyama, S., X-Ray Stress Measurenent the Specimen with a Steep Stress Gradient in Its Wear Surface, JSMS, 21, 1106(1972).Google Scholar