Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T04:25:59.766Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

X-Ray Line Broadening Study on Shock-Modified Hematite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Y. Zhang
Affiliation:
University of Maryland College Park, MD 20742
J. M. Stewart
Affiliation:
University of Maryland College Park, MD 20742
B. Morosin
Affiliation:
Sandia national Laboratories Albuquerque, NM 87185
R. A. Graham
Affiliation:
Sandia national Laboratories Albuquerque, NM 87185
C. R. Hubbard
Affiliation:
National Bureau of Standards Gaithersburg, MD 20899
Get access

Abstract

Hematite (α-Fe2O3) powder compacts have been subjected to controlled, quantitative high pressure shock loading at peak pressures from 8-27 GPa and preserved for post shook analysis. The broadened x-ray diffraction peak profiles have been analyzed to determine the residual lattice strain and the coherent crystallite sizes. Maximum modification effects are observed near 17 GPa with strain values near 3 x 10-3 and size values near 200 Å suggesting annealing at higher shock pressure, resulting from the higher shock temperature.

Type
III. X-Ray Stress/Strain Determination, Fractography, Diffraction, Line Broadening Analysis
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Graham, R.A., Morosin, B, Venturini, E.L. and Carr, H.J., Ann, Rev. Mater, Sci. 16. 315 (1986); references therein.Google Scholar
2. Morosin, B., X-ray Diffraction Line Broadening of Shock-Modified Ceramic Powders, in High Pressure Explosive Processing of Ceramics, edited by Graham, R.A. and Sawaoka, A.B. (Trans Tech, 1987), Chapt. 13.Google Scholar
3. Venturini, E.L., Morosin, B. and Graham, R.A., Mater. Lett. 3 349 (1985).Google Scholar
4. Williamsory, D.L., Venturini, E.L., Graham, B. A. and Motosin, E.., Phys. Rev. B 34 1899 (1986).Google Scholar
5. Morosin, B., Graham, R.A., Venturini, E.L., M. J. Carr, and Williamson, D.L., Proc, of A.P.S. Topical Conference: Shock Waves in Condensed Matter, Monterey, CA 7/20/87.Google Scholar
6. Delhez, R., do Keijsen, Th. H. and Mittemeijer, E. J., Fresenius’ Z. Anal. Chem. 312 (1982) and references therein.Google Scholar
7. Morosin, B. and Mater, R.A. Graham. Sci,-and Eng. 66. 73 (1984).Google Scholar
8. Zhang, Y., Stewart, J.M., Venturini, E.L., and Morosin, B. (paper in preparation).Google Scholar
9. Graham, R.A. and Webb, D.M., in Shock Waves in Condensed Matter. 1983 edited by Asay, J. R., Graham, R.A. and Straub, G.K. (North Holland, New York, 1984, p. 211).Google Scholar
10. Graham, R.A. and Webb, D.M., in Shock Waves in Condensed Matter, edited by Guptra, Y.M. (Plenum, NY, 1986) p. 831.Google Scholar
11. Warren, B.E., Imperfect Crystals. X-rav Diffraction (Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park, CA 1969) Chap. 13.Google Scholar
12. Stokes, R.A., Proc. Phys. Soc. Lond. A61: 382 (1948).Google Scholar
13. Morosin, B. and Graham, R.A., Materials Letters 3 119 (1985).Google Scholar
14. Horie, Y. and Kipp, M.E., Modeling of Shock-Induced Solid State Chemistry, Sandla National Laboratories Report SAND86-2874, June 1987.Google Scholar