Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T00:16:10.456Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Special Problems in Forensic Materials Analysis by XRD

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Michael J. Camp
Michael J. Camp*
Affiliation:
Northeastern University Boston, MA 02115
Get access

Abstract

There are three factors which may influence the method by which a piece of evidence is analyzed in a forensic laboratory. The first stems from the definition of the word forensic. It means ”… pertaining to, connected with, or used in the courts of law…” The major areas of forensic analysis are criminal, regulatory, and civil. The purpose of an analysis may be to aid in the prosecution or defense of criminal charges, to determine if a product meets its statutory requirements, to satisfy a consumer complaint, or to determine liability. For these reasons the legal aspects of an analysis may often put constraints upon the analyst. These may require special handling or documentation procedures.

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 22: Twenty-Seventh Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 1-4, 1978 , 1978 , pp. 13 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. The American College Dictionary, Random House, New York, (1959).Google Scholar
2. Moenssens, A.A., Moses, R.E. and Inbau, F.E., Scientific Evidence in Criminal Cases, The Foundation Press, Mineola, NY, (1973).Google Scholar
3. Hanley, J.R. and Schmidt, W.W., Legal Aspects of Criminal Evidence, McCutchan Publishing Corporation, Berkeley, CA, (1977).Google Scholar
4. Canfield, D.V. and DeForest, P.R., “The Use of the Gandolfi Camera as a Screening and Conformation Tool in the Analysis of Explosive Residues,” Journal of Forensic Sciences, 22, 337–747, (1977).Google Scholar
5. Canfield, D.V., Barrick, J., Camp, M.J. and Giessen, B.C., “The Confirmation of Crystal Test Results by X-ray Diffraction,” presented at the 29th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences, San Diego, CA, February, 1977.Google Scholar
6. Condensed Chemical Dictionary, 8th edition, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, (1971).Google Scholar