Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T12:49:14.352Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Proposed Methods for Depth Profiling of Residual Stresses using Beam-Limiting Masks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Paul Predecki
Affiliation:
Engineering Dept. University of Denver Denver, CO USA
B. Ballard
Affiliation:
Engineering Dept. University of Denver Denver, CO USA
X. Zhu
Affiliation:
Engineering Dept. University of Denver Denver, CO USA
Get access

Abstract

Methods are described which make use of x-ray absorbing masks to either limit beam penetration in the sample (Type I), or confine the diffracting volume within definite limits (Type II). The masks consist of a metal film of Au or U, containing many long, parallel apertures of effective width w and spacing c. The mask is either applied directly to the sample surface (Type I), or to a weakly absorbing film (Be or Kapton) on the sample surface (Type II). With the Type I mask, the diffracting volume can be limited to a surface layer whose maximum depth zm at ψ=0 varies linearly with w, irrespective of sample or wavelength. The masks can be used with ψ-tilts in an Ω-type goniometer, and strains and stresses can be determined by the Sin2ψ method. Depth profiles as a function of depth z (z-profiles) can be obtained with layer removal if gradients over the depth Zm can be neglected. With the Type n mask, the diffracting volume can be limited to a discrete subsurface layer whose average depth depends on (c+w) and the Bragg angle 2θ, and whose thickness depends on w and 2θ. z-Profiles can be obtained by varying the wavelength for a given reflection using a synchrotron source, without the need for layer removal. The methods have not yet been tested experimentally.

Type
V. X-Ray Characterization of Thin Films
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bainbridge, D.W., Rev. of Scientific Instrum., 3 8, 1421-24(1967).Google Scholar
Cullity, B.D., “Elements of X-ray DiffractionAddison-Wesley Publ. Co., 1978, p 292.Google Scholar
Krawitz, A.D., Brune, J.E. and Schmank, M.J., in “Residual Stress and Stress Relaxation”, E. Kula and V. Weiss, editors, 1982, Plenum Press, New York, pp 139156.Google Scholar
Krawitz, A.D., Rudnik, P.J., Butler, B.D. and Cohen, J.B., Adv. in X-ray Anal. 29, 163-171(1986).Google Scholar
Warren, B. E., “X-ray Diffraction”, Addison-Wesley, Reading MA, 1969, p, 49.Google Scholar