Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-17T19:39:37.025Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the X-Ray Diffraction Method of Measurement of Triaxial Stresses with Particular Reference to the Angle 2θo

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

S. Torbaty
Affiliation:
Ecole Nationale Supérieure d'Arts et Métiers, 151 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
J.M. Sprauel
Affiliation:
Ecole Nationale Supérieure d'Arts et Métiers, 151 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
G. Maeder
Affiliation:
Ecole Nationale Supérieure d'Arts et Métiers, 151 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
P.H. Markho
Affiliation:
Ecole Nationale Supérieure d'Arts et Métiers, 151 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
Get access

Abstract

Certain machining processes (e.g. turning, grinding, …) lead to a splitting up and an opening out of the curve of 2θ ϕ ψ = f (sin2ψ). In order to determine the complete stress tensor, it is necessary in this case to use the Dölle-Cohen method but this requires the knowledge of the diffraction angle 2θo for the unstressed material. Such a material, however, is extremely difficult to obtain in practice and the method usually employed uses annealed powder for this measurement. In our study, we show that it is nevertheless possible to determine the angle 2θo on a specimen for which the curve of 2θ ϕ ψ = f (sin2ψ) does not open out. Applying the Dölle-Cohen method to turning of a medium carbon steel, we have been able to bring to the fore: (i) the presence of an opening out of the curve 2θ ϕ ψ = f (sin2ψ), for measurements made in the direction of lay, which is attributed to a shear stress σ23, and (ii) shear stress σ12 which causes a rotation of the stress distribution diagram σϕ = f(ϕ) in the plane of the specimen.

Type
V. X-Ray Stress Determination, Position Sensitive Detectors, Fatigue and Fracture Characterization
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Dölle, H., J. Appl. Cryst., Vol.12, 1979, pp.489–2Google Scholar
2. Dölle, H. and Cohen, J. B., Met. Trans., Vol.IIA, 1980, pp.159–2Google Scholar
3. Maeder, G., Lebrun, J. L. and Sprauel, J. M., N.D.T. Int'l, 1981, pp.235–2Google Scholar
4. Yoshioka, Y., Kawata, M. and Morinaga, M., Adv. in X-ray Anal., Vol.24, 1981, pp,181–2Google Scholar
5. Torbaty, S., Thesis, 1981, Paris VI-ENSAM (Paris)Google Scholar
6. Castex, L., Lebrun, J. L. and Bras, S., Adv. in X-ray Anal., Vol.24, 1981, pp.139–2Google Scholar
7. Sprauel, J. M., Lebrun, J. L., Odent, J. P. and Imbert, G., Mem. Sci. Rev. Met., 1982, pp.7378 Google Scholar