Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T15:39:24.581Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Observations Concerning the Interdiffusion of Cb-1 Zr Alloy with Type 316 Stainless Steel*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

A. V. Manzione
Affiliation:
Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Middletown, Connecticut
F. J. Huegel
Affiliation:
Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Middletown, Connecticut
D. E. Fornwalt
Affiliation:
Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Middletown, Connecticut
Get access

Abstract

Optical and electron metaliographic, X-ray diffraction, and electron microbeam probe studies of the interdiffusion of Cb-1 Zr alloy with type 316 stainless steel are reported. Extruded Cb-1 Zr alloy-type 316 stainless steel diffusion couples were heat treated at temperatures of 732, 871, 982, and 1093°C for time periods of US, 400, 900, 1400 hr. In no case was appreciable diffusion observed in specimens heat treated at 732°C for time periods chosen. Diffusion zones based on the systems iron-columbium and columbium-nickel-iron were observed in varying degrees in all other specimens. An activation energy for the rate-control ling process in the growth of the diffusion layers is reported. The growth rates of the observed zones were found to be retarded when these data were compared with data reported by other investigators for the interdiffusion of unalloyed columbiiim-type 316 stainless steel diffusion couples. Postulations arc made to explain this retarded growth rate and also to explain the growth of a nickel enriched columbium-iron-nickel-chromium intermetallic zone adjacent to the columbium.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This work performed under AEC Contract AT(30-1)-2789.

References

1. Stone, P. and Davies, R., Private communication, NASA, Lewis Research Center.Google Scholar
2. Castaing, R., Thesis, University of Paris, 1951.Google Scholar
3. Poole, D. M. and Thomas, P. M., Quantitative Electron-Probe Microanalysis, United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority Report AERE-R-3815, 1963.Google Scholar
4. Birks, L. S., “Calculation of X-Ray Intensities from Electron Probe Specimens,” J. Appl. Phys. 32: 387, 1961.Google Scholar
5. Aim, S. and Kiessling, R., “Chromium Depletion Around Grain-Boundary Precipitates in Austenitic Stainless Steel, J. Inst. Metals 91: 190, 1962.Google Scholar
6. Smith, G. V., Seens, W. B., Link, H. S., and Malenock, P. R., “Microstructural Instability of Steels for Elevated Temperature Service,” Proc. ASTM 51: 895, 1951.Google Scholar
7. Goldschmidt, H. J., “New Intermediate Phases in the Iron-Niobium System,” Research 10: 289, 1957.Google Scholar
8. Birks, L. S. and Seebold, R. E., “Diffusion of Nb with Cr, Fe, Ni, Mo, and Stainless Steel,” J. Nuclear Materials 3: 249, 1961.Google Scholar
9. Lena, A. J. and Curry, W. E., “Effect of Cold Work and Recrystallization on Formation of Sigma Phase in Highly Stable Austenitic Stainless Steel,” Tram. ASM 47: 193, 1955.Google Scholar