Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T00:33:36.635Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Determination of Particle Size Distribution in a Dispersion Hardened Nickel Alloy Using Small Angle X-Ray Scattering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

R. W. Gould  and
S. R. Bates
R. W. Gould
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, University of Florida Gainesville, Florida 32601
S. R. Bates
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, University of Florida Gainesville, Florida 32601
Get access

Abstract

It has been recently shown that particle size distributions can be determined from small angle x-ray scattering data. Size distributions have previously been measured in aluminum-zinc and aluminum-silver alloys containing spherical Guinier-Preston zones. Inorder to obtain the size distribution it is only necessary to calculate the Guinier radius and the Porod radius.

Dispersion hardened nickel alloys containing small spherical particles of thoria appear to be amenable to this type of analysis. A nickel-20% chromium-2% ThO2 alloy was selected for this study. The particle size distribution obtained by small angle x-ray scattering is compared with the transmission electron microscopy results found in the literature.

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 12: Seventeenth Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 21-23, 1968 , 1968 , pp. 87 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Guinier, A. et al, Small Angle Scattering of X-rays, J. Wiley and Sons, New York, 1955.Google Scholar
2. Gerold, V., “Application of Small Angle X-ray Scattering to Problems in Physical Metallurgy and Metal Physics,” in H. Brumberger, Editor, Small Angle X-ray Scattering, Gorden and Breach, New York, 1955, p. 277–317.Google Scholar
3. Letcher, J. H. and Schmidt, P. W., “Small Angle X-ray Scattering Determination of Particle-Diameter Distributions in Polydisperse Suspensions of Spherical Partials,” J. Applied Physics 37:649–655, 1966.Google Scholar
4. Harkness, S. D., Gould, R. W. and Hren, J. J., “A Critical Evaluation of X-ray Small Angle Scattering Parameters by Transmission Electron Microscopy: GP Zones in Al Alloys,” Phil. Mag., 1968 (accepted for publication).Google Scholar
5. Baur, R. and Gerold, V., “Vergleichende röntgengraphische und electron mikroskopische Untersuchungen der Grösse von Guinier-Preston-Zonen in Aluminium-Silber,” Acta Met. 12: 1449–1453, 1964.Google Scholar
6. Bousquet, P. L., Masters Degree Thesis, Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, University of Florida, 1968.Google Scholar
7. Gerold, V., “Die Zonenbildung in Aluminium-Zink Legierungen,” Physica Status Solidi 1:37–49, 1961.Google Scholar
8. Gould, R. W. and Sanvald, R. C., “A Computer Program for Simple Small Angle Scattering Calculations,” Norelco Reporter XIV: 22–24, 1967.Google Scholar
9. Wilcox, B. A., Clauer, A. H. and McCain, W. S., “Creep and Creep Fracture of a Ni-20Cr-2ThO2 Alloy,” Trans. AIME 239:1791–1795, 1967 Google Scholar
10. Mee, P. B. and Sinclair, R. A., “Cold Rolling and Annealing Behavior in Nickel-Thoria Sheet, with Particular Reference to Preferred-Orientation Development,” J. Inst. Metals 94:319–326, 1966.Google Scholar