Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T23:53:56.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Determination Of Nitrogen and Other Elements in Plant Material By X-Ray Fluorescence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

D. Bonvin
Affiliation:
ARI/Fisons Instruments, En Vallaire CH-1024 Ecublens, Switzerland
K. Juchli
Affiliation:
ARI/Fisons Instruments, En Vallaire CH-1024 Ecublens, Switzerland
B.W. Adamson
Affiliation:
ARI/Fisons Instruments, En Vallaire CH-1024 Ecublens, Switzerland
Get access

Extract

In the early years, the element range covered by the Wavelength Dispersive X-Ray fluorescence (WDXRF) technique was restricted by the quality of vacuum, crystals and detectors in the system. The lightest element detectable was Aluminium (Z = 13). The area of light element analysis had obvious potential for extension over the years. It created the barrier for XRP coverage of the Periodic Table because the naturally softer radiations lay out of range of the technique. In the middle of the 1980's, new technology became available for the manufacture of synthetic crystals with artificially created 2d spacings to suit the X-ray wavelength range of interest. These hyered synthetic microstructures (also called “multilayer crystals”) allowed more sensitivity to be achieved in this part of the spectrum, and the bottom element limit soon moved down towards lighter elements.

Type
IX. XRS Mathematical Methods, Trace Analysis and Other Applications
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.LSM micro-structures as dispersing devices in X-ray spectrometersGilfrich, J.V., Nagel, D.J., Barbee, T.W. Jr. Applied Spectroscopy, vol. 36, No 1 1982.Google Scholar
2.The analysis of carbon and other light elements using layered synthetic mlcrostructuresAnzelmo, J.A., Boyer, B.W., Advances in X-ray Analysis, Vol. 30, 1987.Google Scholar
3.Factors influencing limits of detection in X-ray fluorescence analysisPrice, B.J. International Labtnate, Vol. XI, issue 5, 1986.Google Scholar
4. Matching collimator divergence to dispersion devices for light elements analysis: part IIAnzelmo, J.A., Boyer, B.W.. Advances in X-ray Analysis, Vol. 31, 1988.Google Scholar
5.Improvements in sensitivity and resolution in wavelength dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometryAnzelmo, J.A., Boyer, B.W., Yellepeddi, R., Bonvin, D.. International Labmate, vol XV, issue 3, 1990.Google Scholar
6.Improvements in light elements and liquids analysis using wavelength dispersive X-ray spectrometryAdamson, B.W., Bonvin, D., Juchli, K.. Paper presented at the Pittsburgh Conference, Chicago 1991.Google Scholar
7.Sulphur and light element determination in plant material by XRFSchnug, E., Haneklaus, S.. Phyton, 1992, 32(3).Google Scholar