Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

How to approach a research ethics committee

  • George Masterton and Prem Shah

Abstract

This article describes research ethics and the UK research ethics system for psychiatrists who are engaged in research or in supporting trainees with research projects. The emphasis on practical aspects should ensure that submissions to research ethics committees are improved, and consequently the likelihood of a successful outcome is increased.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      How to approach a research ethics committee
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      How to approach a research ethics committee
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      How to approach a research ethics committee
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

References

Hide All
Bhopal, R. (1997) Is research into ethnicity and health racist, unsound, or important science? BMJ, 314, 17511756.
British Psychological Society (2006) Ethical Principles for Conducting Research with Human Participants. British Psychological Society.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2005) ‘The Tuskegee Timeline’. CDC. http://www.cdc.gov/nchstp/od/tuskegee/time.htm
Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (2004) Standard Operating Procedures for Research Ethics Committees in the United Kingdom (Version 2.0). COREC.
Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (2006) ‘Differentiating Audit, Service Evaluation and Research’. COREC. http://www.corec.org.uk/applicants/help/docs/Audit_or_Research_table.pdf
Department of Health (1991) Guidelines to Local Research Ethics Committees. TSO (The Stationery Office).
Department of Health (2005) Report of the Ad Hoc Advisory Group on the Operation of NHS Research Ethics Committees (Report 268110). Department of Health.
Hearnshaw, H. (2004) Comparison of requirements of research ethics committees in eleven European countries for a non-invasive, interventional study. BMJ, 328, 140141.
Iversen, A., Liddell, K., Fear, N. et al (2006) Consent, confidentiality and the Data Protection Act. BMJ, 332, 165169.
Royal College of Physicians (1990) Guidelines on the Practice of Ethics Committees in Medical Research Involving Human Subjects (2nd edn). Royal College of Physicians of London.
Royal College of Physicians of London (1996) Guidelines on the Practice of Ethics Committees in Medical Research Involving Human Subjects (3rd edn). Royal College of Physicians of London.
Royal College of Psychiatrists (1990) Guidelines for Research Ethics Committees on psychiatric research involving human subjects. Psychiatric Bulletin, 14, 4861.
Royal College of Psychiatrists (2001) Guidelines for Researchers and for Research Ethics Committees on Psychiatric Research Involving Human Participants (Council Report CR82). Royal College of Psychiatrists.
Smith, R. (2004) My last choice. BMJ, 329, 0g. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7460.0-g
Wald, D. (2004) Bureaucracy of ethics applications. BMJ, 329, 282285.
Walley, T. (2006) Using personal health information in medical research. BMJ, 332, 130131.
Wilson, A., Grimshaw, G., Baker, R. et al (1999) Differentiating between audit and research: postal survey of health authorities' views. BMJ, 319, 1235.
Working Party on Research on the Mentally Incapacitated (1993) Ethical Conduct of Research on the Mentally Incapacitated. MRC. http://www.mrc.ac.uk/Utilities/Documentrecord/index.htm?d=MRC002409
World Medical Association (2000) Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. WAM. http://www.wma.net/e/policy/b3.htm

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

How to approach a research ethics committee

  • George Masterton and Prem Shah

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.

How to approach a research ethics committee

  • George Masterton and Prem Shah
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.

×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *