Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T19:22:59.571Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Field Conservation of Skeletal Remains: Stabilization Treatment Techniques and Implications for Future Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2019

Harriet F. Beaubien Open the ORCID record for Harriet F. Beaubien [Opens in a new window]
Harriet F. Beaubien*
Affiliation:
Museum Conservation Institute, Smithsonian Institution, 4210 Silver Hill Road, Suitland, MD 20746, USA; and Beaubien Conservation, 706 Camino Militar, Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA (beaubienh@gmail.com)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The information potential of human skeletal remains—as for any excavated material—is impacted by the conditions of archaeological burial, and the environments and actions experienced during subsequent excavation, laboratory processing, study, and storage. A conservation approach emphasizes the mitigation of threats to material stability and integrity, which for excavated collections are often most critical at the point of archaeological exposure and recovery. Conservation techniques involving application of modern synthetic materials for stabilizing skeletal remains in the field are discussed, using case examples primarily from terrestrial archaeological projects in Mesoamerica. The potential effects of the use of various conservation materials on results of biomolecular instrumental analysis are included.

El potencial informativo de los restos humanos, como todo tipo de material excavado, se ve afectado por las condiciones del enterramiento arqueológico y por los contextos y acciones a los que estuvieron expuestos durante la excavación, procesamiento de laboratorio, estudio y almacenamiento. Un enfoque de conservación enfatiza atenuar los riesgos a la estabilidad e integridad del material, factores que para las colecciones excavadas son más críticos en el momento de la exposición y recuperación arqueológicas. En este artículo se discuten técnicas de conservación que incluyen la aplicación de materiales sintéticos modernos para estabilizar los restos óseos en el campo, utilizando ejemplos de casos principalmente de proyectos arqueológicos terrestres en Mesoamérica. Se discuten los posibles efectos del uso de diversos materiales de conservación en los resultados del análisis instrumental biomolecular.

Keywords

human remainsfield conservationconsolidationfacingjacketingliftingbiomolecular analysisrestos humanosconservación en campoconsolidaciónreforzadoencamisamientoextracciónanálisis biomolecular
Type
Articles
Information
Advances in Archaeological Practice , Volume 7 , Special Issue 1: The Practice and Ethics of Skeletal Conservation , February 2019 , pp. 23 - 29
Copyright
Copyright 2019 © Society for American Archaeology 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES CITED

American Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works 2018 Code of Ethics, Guidelines for Practice, and Commentaries. Electronic document, http://www.conservation-us.org/our-organizations/association-(aic)/governance/code-of-ethics-and-guidelines-for-practice.Google Scholar
Beaubien, Harriet F. 2011 Recovering Painted Organic Objects from Ancient Mesoamerica: Strategic Considerations in the Field and the Lab. In Objects Specialty Group Postprints, 39th Annual Meeting, American Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Vol. 18:3–23.Google Scholar
Bell, Ellen E., Traxler, Loa P., Sedat, David W., and Sharer, Robert J. 1999 Uncovering Copán's Earliest Royal Tombs. Expedition 41(2):29–35.Google Scholar
Buikstra, Jane E., Price, T. D., Wright, Lori E., and Burton, J. A. 2004 Tombs from the Copan Acropolis: A Life History Approach. In Understanding Early Classic Copan, edited by Bell, Ellen E., Canuto, Marcello A., and Sharer, Robert J., pp. 191–212. University of Pennsylvania Museum, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
CAMEO: Conservation and Art Materials Encyclopedia Online 2018 MATERIALS Database. Electronic document, http://cameo.mfa.org/wiki/Category:Materials_database.Google Scholar
Cassman, Vicki, and Odegaard, Nancy 2004 Human Remains and the Conservator's Role. Studies in Conservation 49(4):271–282.Google Scholar
Cassman, Vicki, and Odegaard, Nancy 2007 Storage and Transport. In Human Remains: Guide for Museums and Academic Institutions, edited by Cassman, Vicki, Odegaard, Nancy, and Powell, Joseph, pp. 103–128. AltaMira Press, Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, Maryland.Google Scholar
Cassman, Vicki, Odegaard, Nancy, and Powell, Joseph (editors) 2007 Human Remains: Guide for Museums and Academic Institutions. AltaMira Press, Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, Maryland.Google Scholar
Cooper, Alan, Fleischer, Rob, James, Helen, and Tuross, Noreen 1994 Studies of the Effects of Bone Consolidants on Endogenous DNA. Ancient DNA Newsletter 2(1):15–16.Google Scholar
Cronyn, Janey M. 1990 The Elements of Archaeological Conservation. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Eklund, Julie Ann 2007 The Effects of Preparation and Conservation Treatments on DNA. PhD dissertation, Institute of Archaeology, University College London, London.Google Scholar
Estrada-Belli, Francisco 2010 The First Maya Civilization: Ritual and Power before the Classic Period. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Fash, William L., Beaubien, Harriet F., Magee, Catherine E., Fash, Barbara W., and Williamson, Richard V. 2001 The Trappings of Kingship among the Classic Maya: Ritual and Identity in a Royal Tomb from Copán. In Fleeting Identities: Perishable Material Culture in Archaeological Research, edited by Drooker, Penelope B., pp. 152–169. Occasional Paper No. 28. Center for Archaeological Investigations, Carbondale, Illinois.Google Scholar
France, Christine A. M., Epitropou, Anastasia, and Kavich, Gwénaëlle M. 2018 The Effects of Cellulose Nitrate Treatment and Organic Solvent Removal on δ13C, δ15N, and δ18O Values of Collagen and Bioapatite in Modern Mammal Bone. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences. Electronic document, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-018-0616-8.Google Scholar
France, Christine A. M., Giaccai, Jennifer A., and Cano, Nadia 2011 The Effects of PVAc Treatment and Organic Solvent Removal on δ13C, δ15N, and δ18O Values of Collagen and Hydroxyapatite in a Modern Bone. Journal of Archaeological Science 38:3387–3393.Google Scholar
France, Christine A. M., Giaccai, Jennifer A., and Doney, Charlotte R. 2015 Brief Communication: The Effects of Paraloid B-72 and Butvar B-98 Treatment and Organic Solvent Removal on δ13C, δ15N, and δ18O Values of Collagen and Hydroxyapatite in a Modern Bone. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 157:330–338.Google Scholar
France, Christine A. M., Kaczkowski, Rebecca, and Kavich, Gwénaëlle 2018 The Effects of Consolidant Treatments and Organic Solvent Removal on Bones, Using Stable Isotopes as Tracers. Poster presented at the 2018 Collections Share Fair, sponsored by the National Collections Program and the Smithsonian Collections Advisory Committee, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, May 9. Available from the author at the Museum Conservation Institute, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Horie, Charles V. 1992 Materials for Conservation: Organic Consolidants, Adhesives and Coatings. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.Google Scholar
Johnson, Jessica S. 1994 Consolidation of Archaeological Bone: A Conservation Perspective. Journal of Field Archaeology 21:221–233.Google Scholar
Johnson, Jessica S. 2001 A Long-Term Look at the Polymers Used to Preserve Bone. In Human Remains: Conservation, Retrieval and Analysis, edited by Williams, Emily, pp. 99–102. BAR International Series 934. Archaeopress, British Archaeological Reports, Oxford.Google Scholar
Koch, Paul L., Tuross, Noreen, and Fogel, Marilyn L. 1997 The Effects of Sample Treatment and Diagenesis on the Isotopic Integrity of Carbonate in Biogenic Hydroxylapatite. Journal of Archaeological Science 24:417–429.Google Scholar
Koob, Stephen P. 1984 The Consolidation of Archaeological Bone. In Adhesives and Consolidants, edited by Brommelle, Norman S., Pye, Elizabeth M., Smith, Perry, and Thompson, Garry, pp. 98–102. International Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works, London.Google Scholar
Kres, Leah A., and Lovell, Nancy C. 1995 A Comparison of Consolidants for Archaeological Bone. Journal of Field Archaeology 22:508–515.Google Scholar
McGowan, Gary S., and LaRoche, Cheryl J. 1996 The Ethical Dilemma Facing Conservation: Care and Treatment of Human Skeletal Remains and Mortuary Objects. Journal of the American Institute for Conservation 35(2):109–121.Google Scholar
Mayo, Julia, and Carles, Juan (editors) 2015 Guerreros de Oro: Los Señores de Río Grande en Panamá/Golden Warriors: The Lords of Río Grande in Panama. Editora del Caribe, Panama City, Panama.Google Scholar
Moore, Katherine M., Murray, Matthew L., and Schoeninger, Margaret J. 1989 Dietary Reconstruction from Bones Treated with Preservatives. Journal of Archaeological Science 16:437–446.Google Scholar
Odegaard, Nancy, and Cassman, Vicki 2007 Treatment and Invasive Actions. In Human Remains: Guide for Museums and Academic Institutions, edited by Cassman, Vicki, Odegaard, Nancy, and Powell, Joseph, pp. 77–95. AltaMira Press, Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, Maryland.Google Scholar
Payton, Robert 1992 On-Site Conservation Techniques: Lifting Principles and Methods. In Retrieval of Objects from Archaeological Sites, edited by Payton, Robert, pp. 1–26. Archetype, Denbigh, Clwyd, Wales, UK.Google Scholar
Pedelì, Corrado, and Pulga, Stefano 2013 Conservation Practices on Archaeological Excavations: Principles and Methods. Translated by Risser, Erik. Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Pohl, Christie M., Greg Hodgins, Robert J. Speakman, and Beaubien, Harriet F. 2009 The Effect of Cyclododecane on Carbon-14 Dating of Archaeological Materials. Journal of the American Institute for Conservation 48(3):223–233.Google Scholar
Roberts, Heidi, and Eklund, Julie 2007 Fieldwork. In Human Remains: Guide for Museums and Academic Institutions, edited by Cassman, Vicki, Odegaard, Nancy, and Powell, Joseph, pp. 183–203. AltaMira Press, Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, Maryland.Google Scholar
Sease, Catherine 1994 A Conservation Manual for the Field Archaeologist. 3rd ed. Archaeological Research Tools 4. Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles. Electronic document, http://escholarship.org/uc/item/8ft6488x.Google Scholar
Tuross, Noreen 1995 Archaeological Artifact and Biomolecule Affiliation: Testing the Consequences of Cleaning. In Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology IV, edited by Vandiver, Pamela B., Druzik, James R., Galvan Madrid, Jose Luis, Freestone, Ian C., and Wheeler, George Segan, pp. 41–50. Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, Vol. 352. Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Tuross, Noreen, and Fogel, Marilyn L. 1994 Exceptional Molecular Preservation in the Fossil Record: The Archaeological, Conservation and Scientific Challenge. In Archaeometry of Pre-Columbian Sites and Artifacts, edited by Scott, David and Meyers, Pieter, pp. 367–380. Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Vuissoz, Annick 2004 The Impact of Conservation Treatments on DNA Retrieval from Leather. Master's thesis, Haute École d'Arts Appliqués. University of Applied Sciences of Western Switzerland, Neuchâtel (in French).Google Scholar
Vuissoz, Annick, and Gilbert, M. Thomas 2007 The Impact of Preservation Treatments on DNA. In Human Remains: Guide for Museums and Academic Institutions, edited by Cassman, Vicki, Odegaard, Nancy, and Powell, Joseph, pp. 92–94. AltaMira Press, Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, Maryland.Google Scholar
Webster, David, Fash, William L. Jr., Baudez, Claude F., Riese, Berthold, and Sanders, William T. 1989 The House of the Bacabs, Copan, Honduras. Studies in Pre-Columbian Art and Archaeology 29:1–116.Google Scholar
Williams, Emily (editor) 2001 Human Remains: Conservation, Retrieval and Analysis. BAR International Series 934. Archaeopress, British Archaeological Reports, Oxford.Google Scholar
Wright, Lori 2002 The Inhabitants of Tikal: A Bioarchaeological Pilot Project. Report submitted to the Foundation for the Advancement of Mesoamerican Studies. Electronic document, http://www.famsi.org/reports/95050/95050Wright01.pdf.Google Scholar