Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:20:28.769Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Numerical Optimization and Noise Analysis of High-Tip-Speed Wind Turbine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2017

Long Wang
Affiliation:
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Hi-Tech Research for Wind Turbine Design, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210016, China State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control for Mechanical Structures, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210016, China
Guoping Chen
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control for Mechanical Structures, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210016, China
Tongguang Wang*
Affiliation:
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Hi-Tech Research for Wind Turbine Design, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210016, China
Jiufa Cao
Affiliation:
College of Energy and Power Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225009, China
*
*Corresponding author. Email:tgwang@nuaa.edu.cn (T. G. Wang)
Get access

Abstract

With lower turbulence and less rigorous restrictions on noise levels, offshore wind farms provide favourable conditions for the development of high-tip-speed wind turbines. In this study, the multi-objective optimization is presented for a 5MW wind turbine design and the effects of high tip speed on power output, cost and noise are analysed. In order to improve the convergence and efficiency of optimization, a novel type of gradient-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm is proposed based on uniform decomposition and differential evolution. Optimization examples of the wind turbines indicate that the new algorithm can obtain uniformly distributed optimal solutions and this algorithm outperforms the conventional evolutionary algorithms in convergence and optimization efficiency. For the 5MW wind turbines designed, increasing the tip speed can greatly reduce the cost of energy (COE). When the tip speed increases from 80m/s to 100m/s, under the same annual energy production, the COE decreases by 3.2% in a class I wind farm and by 5.1% in a class III one, respectively, while the sound pressure level increases by a maximum of 4.4dB with the class III wind farm case.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Global-Science Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Guo, Y., Parsons, T., Dykes, K. and King, R. N., A systems engineering analysis of three- point and four- point wind turbine drivetrain configurations, Wind Energy, Published online in Wiley Online Library (http://wileyonlinelibrary.com), 2016.Google Scholar
[2] Resor, B. R., Maniaci, D. C., Berg, J. C. and Richards, P., Effects of increasing tip velocity on wind turbine rotor design, Sandia National Laboratories: SAND2014-3136 518390, 2013.Google Scholar
[3] Ganjefar, S., Ghassemi, A. A. and Ahmadi, M. M., Improving efficiency of two-type maximum power point tracking methods of tip-speed ratio and optimum torque in wind turbine system using a quantum neural network, Energy, 67 (2014), pp. 444453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Nejad, A. R., Guo, Y., Gao, Z. and Moan, T., Development of a 5MW reference gearbox for offshore wind turbines, Wind Energy, 19 (2015), pp. 10891106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Arany, L., Bhattacharya, S., MacDonald, J. and Hogan, S. J., Simplified critical mudline bending moment spectra of offshore wind turbine support structures, Wind Energy, 18 (2015), pp. 21712197.Google Scholar
[6] Wang, H., Barthelmie, R. J., Pryor, S. C. and Kim, H. G., A new turbulence model for offshore wind turbine standards, Wind Energy, 17 (2014), pp. 15871604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Türk, M. and Emeis, S., The dependence of offshore turbulence intensity on wind speed, J. Wind Eng. Indust. Aerodyn., 98 (2010), pp. 466471.Google Scholar
[8] Chehouri, A., Younes, R., Ilinca, A. and Perron, J., Review of performance optimization techniques applied to wind turbines, Appl. Energy, 142 (2015), pp. 361388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Gray, J. S., Hearn, T. A., Moore, K. T., Hwang, J. T., Martins, J. R. and Ning, A., Automatic evaluation of multidisciplinary derivatives using a graph-based problem formulation in Open MDAO, 15th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Giguère, P. P., Selig, M. S. and Tangler, J. L., Blade design trade-offs using low-lift airfoils for stall-regulated HAWTs, J. Solar Energy Eng., 121 (1999), pp. 217223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Benini, E. and Toffolo, A., Optimal design of horizontal-axis wind turbines using blade-element theory and evolutionary computation, J. Solar Energy Eng., 124 (2002), pp. 357363.Google Scholar
[12] Kusiak, A., Zhang, Z. and Li, M., Optimization of wind turbine performance with data-driven models, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 1 (2010), pp. 6676.Google Scholar
[13] Dufo-Lopez, R., Multi-objective optimization minimizing cost and life cycle emissions of standalone PV-wind-diesel systems with batteries storage, Appl. Energy, 88 (2011), pp. 40334041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14] Ju, Y. P. and Zhang, C. H., Multi-point robust design optimization of wind turbine airfoil under geometric uncertainty, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part A Journal of Power & Energy, 226 (2012), pp. 245261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15] Wang, L., Wang, T. G. and Luo, Y., Improved non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA)-II in multi-objective optimization studies of wind turbine blades, Appl. Math. Mech., 32 (2011), pp. 739748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16] Sessarego, M., A hybrid multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for wind-turbine blade optimization, Eng. Opt., 47 (2015), pp. 10431062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17] Sorkhabi, S. Y. D., Romero, D. A., Yan, G. K., Gu, M. D., Moran, J., Morgenroth, M. and Amon, C. H., The impact of land use constraints in multi-objective energy-noise wind farm layout optimization, Renewable Energy, 85 (2016), pp. 359370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18] Wang, W., Caro, S., Bennis, F., Soto, R. and Crawford, B., Multi-objective robust optimization using a postoptimality sensitivity analysis technique: application to a wind turbine design, J. Mech. Design, 137 (2015), 011403-1-11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19] Liao, C. C., Zhao, X. L. and Xu, J. Z., Blade layers optimization of wind turbines using FAST and improved PSO algorithm, Renew Energy, 42 (2012), pp. 227233.Google Scholar
[20] Sharafi, M., Elmekkawy, T. Y. and Bibeau, E. L., Optimal design of hybrid renewable energy systems in buildings with low to high renewable energy ratio, Renewable Energy, 83 (2015), pp. 10261042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21] Ning, A. and Petch, D., Integrated design of downwind land-based wind turbines using analytic gradients, Wind Energy, Published online in Wiley Online Library (http://wileyonlinelibrary.com), 2016.Google Scholar
[22] Lucken, C., Baran, B. and Abrizuela, C., A survey on multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for many-objective problems, Comput. Opt. Appl., 58 (2014), pp. 707756.Google Scholar
[23] Bänos, R., Manzano-Agugliaro, F., Montoya, F. G., Gil, C., Alcayde, A. and Gómez, J., Optimization methods applied to renewable and sustainable energy: A review, Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15 (2011), pp. 17531766.Google Scholar
[24] Chang, B., Miller, A., Issa, R. and Chen, G., Review of computer-aided numerical simulation in wind energy, Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 25 (2013), pp. 122134.Google Scholar
[25] Wang, X., Shen, W. Z., Zhu, W. J., Srensen, J. N. and Jin, C., Shape optimization of wind turbine blades, Wind Energy, 12 (2009), pp. 781-803.Google Scholar
[26] Wood, D. H., Dual purpose design of small wind turbine blades, Wind Eng., 28 (2004), pp. 511527.Google Scholar
[27] Abedi, S., A comprehensive method for optimal power management and design of hybrid RES-based autonomous energy systems, Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16 (2012), pp. 15771587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[28] Wagner, T., Beume, N. and Naujoks, B., Pareto-, aggregation- and indicator-based methods in many-objective optimization, Int. Conference Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization, 2007.Google Scholar
[29] Resor, B. R. and Brian, R., Definition of a 5MW/61.5m wind turbine blade reference model, SAND2013-2569 463454, 2013.Google Scholar
[30] Coulling, A. J., Goupee, A. J., Robertson, A. N., Jonkman, J. M. and Dagher, H. J., Validation of a FAST semi-submersible floating wind turbine numerical model with DeepCwind test data, J. Renewable Sustainable Energy, 5 (2013), 023116.Google Scholar
[31] Gasmi, A., Sprague, M. A., Jonkman, J. M. and Jones, W. B., Numerical stability and accuracy of temporally coupled multi-physics modules in wind turbine CAE tools, AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum & Aerospace Exposition, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[32] Ning, A., Damiani, R. and Moriarty, P., Objectives and constraints for wind turbine optimization, J. Solar Energy Eng., 136 (2013), pp. 303312.Google Scholar
[33] Resor, B. R. and Maniaci, D. C., Definition of the national rotor testbed: an aeroelastically relevant research-scale wind turbine rotor, AIAA SciTech: 32nd ASME Wind Energy Symposium. 2013.Google Scholar
[34] Benini, E. and Toffolo, A., Optimal design of horizontal-axis wind turbines using blade-element theory and evolutionary computation, J. Solar Energy Eng., 124 (2002), pp. 357363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[35] Hand, M. M., Simms, D. A., Fingersh, L. J., Jager, D. W., Cotrell, J. R., Schreck, S. and Larwood, S. M., Unsteady aerodynamics experiment phase VI: wind tunnel test configurations and available data campaigns, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, Report No. NREL/TP-500-29955, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[36] Jonkman, J., Butterfield, S., Musial, W. and Scott, G., Definition of a 5MW reference wind turbine for offshore system development, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Tech Rep, NREL/TP-500-38060, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[37] Qiu, X., Xu, J. X., Tan, K. C. and Abbass, H. A., Adaptive cross-generation differential evolution operators for multiobjective optimization, IEEE Trans. Evolutionary Comput., 20 (2016), pp. 232244.Google Scholar
[38] Bader, J. and Zitzler, E., HypE: An algorithm for fast hypervolume-based many-objective optimization, Evolutionary Comput., 19 (2011), pp. 4576.Google Scholar
[39] Brooks, F. T., Pope, D. S. and Marcolini, M. A., Airfoil self-noise and prediction, NASA Reference Publication, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Office of Management, Scientific and Technical Information Division, NASA-RP-1218, 1989.Google Scholar
[40] Lowson, M. V., Assessment and prediction model for wind turbine noise: basic aerodynamic and acoustic models, Department of Trade and Industry, W/13/00284/REP, 1993.Google Scholar
[41] Moriarty, P. and Migliore, P., Semi-empirical aeroacoustic noise prediction code for wind turbines, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Tech Rep, NREL-TP-500-34478, 2003.Google Scholar
[42] Kim, H., Lee, S., Son, E., Lee, S. and Lee, S., Aerodynamic noise analysis of large horizontal axis wind turbines considering fluid-structure interaction, Renewable Energy, 42 (2012), pp. 4653.Google Scholar
[43] Anicic, O., Petković, D. and Cvetkovic, S., Evaluation of wind turbine noise by soft computing methodologies: A comparative study, Renewable Sustainable Energy Reviews, 56 (2016), pp. 11221128.Google Scholar
[44] Türk, M. and Emeis, S., The dependence of offshore turbulence intensity on wind speed, J. Wind Eng. Industrial Aerodyn., 98 (2010), pp. 466471.Google Scholar