Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T10:30:22.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two methods for processing yield maps from multiple sensors in large vineyards in California

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2017

B. Sams ,
C. Litchfield ,
L. Sanchez  and
N. Dokoozlian
B. Sams*
Affiliation:
E&J Gallo Winery, 600 Yosemite Blvd, Modesto, CA, USA, 95354
C. Litchfield
Affiliation:
E&J Gallo Winery, 600 Yosemite Blvd, Modesto, CA, USA, 95354
L. Sanchez
Affiliation:
E&J Gallo Winery, 600 Yosemite Blvd, Modesto, CA, USA, 95354
N. Dokoozlian
Affiliation:
E&J Gallo Winery, 600 Yosemite Blvd, Modesto, CA, USA, 95354
*
† E-mail: brent.sams@ejgallo.com
Get access

Abstract

Yield mapping techniques have only recently started to be implemented by the Californian wine grape industry, but the advancement has necessitated new processing methods for large vineyards. The process for mapping large blocks harvested with multiple machines has only recently occurred and implies that their yield monitors have to be calibrated and corrected to the same scale. Here we discuss two methods for processing yield maps at the commercial level. Method 1 depends on many calibrations with delivered fruit weight to a winery. Method 2 normalizes raw files automatically can reduce total processing time by up to 90%.

Keywords

Yield mappingmean comparisonvineyard variability
Type
Precision Horticulture and Viticulture
Information
Advances in Animal Biosciences , Volume 8 , Special Issue 2: Papers presented at the 11th European Conference on Precision Agriculture (ECPA 2017), John McIntyre Centre, Edinburgh, UK, July 16–20 2017 , July 2017 , pp. 530 - 533
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnó Satorra, J, Martínez Casasnovas, JA, Ribes Dasi, M and Rosell Polo, JR 2009. Review. Precision viticulture. Research topics, challenges and opportunities in site-specific vineyard management. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 7 (4), 779–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bramley, RGV 2001. Variation in the yield and quality of winegrapes and the effect of soil property variation in two contrasting Australian vineyards. In: Precision Agriculture ’01: Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Precision Agriculture, edited by S Blackmore and G Grenier, BIOS Scientific Publishers Ltd, Oxford, UK, pp. 767–772.Google Scholar
Bramley, RGV and Williams, SK 2001. A protocol for the construction of yield maps from data collected using commercially available grape yield monitors. Cooperative Research Center for Viticulture, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
California Department of Food and Agriculture 2014. California Grape Acreage Report. http://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/California/Publications/Grape_Acreage/201504gabtb00.pdf. (retrieved 10/10/16).Google Scholar
Cook, SE and Bramley, RGV 1998. Precision agriculture—opportunities, benefits and pitfalls of site-specific crop management in Australia. Animal Production Science 38, 753–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The National Association of American Wineries 2014. About the US Grape and Wine Industry. Winegrape Growers of America, http://winegrapegrowersofamerica.org/files/documents/About_the_US_Grape_and_Wine_Industry_2014_FINAL.pdf. (retrieved 10/9/16).Google Scholar
Tagarakis, A, Liakos, V, Fountas, S, Koundouras, S and Gemtos, T 2013. Management zones delineation using fuzzy clustering techniques in grapevines. Precision Agriculture 14, 18–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troxell, E, Sams, BS, Sánchez, L and Dokoozlian, N 2014. Understanding Vineyard Yield and Fruit Quality Variability. In Proceedings of the 65th American Socierty of Enology and Viticulture National Conference & 39th American Society of Enology and Viticulture Eastern Section Annual Meeting, Austin, Texas, USA.Google Scholar
Whelan, BM, McBratney, AB and Minasny, B 2002. Vesper 1.5–spatial prediction software for precision agriculture. In Proceedings of the 6th Internation Conference on Precision Agriculture, Madison, WI, USA.Google Scholar
Wine Institute 2015. Wine Consumption in the U.S. Wine Institute, Sacrameneto, CA http://www.wineinstitute.org/resources/statistics/article86. (retrieved 10/9/16).Google Scholar