Element contents
Monotheism and the Suffering of Animals in Nature
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 June 2023
Summary
This Element concerns itself with a particular aspect of the problem posed to monotheistic religious thought by suffering, namely the suffering of non-human creatures in nature. It makes some comparisons between Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, and then explores the problem in depth within Christian thought. After clarification of the nature of the problem, the Element considers a range of possible responses, including those based on a fall-event, those based on freedom of process, and those hypothesising a constraint on the possibilities for God as creator. Proposals based on the motif of self-emptying are evaluated. Two other aspects of the question concern God's providential relationship to the evolving creation, and the possibility of resurrection lives for animals. After consideration of the possibility of combining different explanations, the Element ends its discussion by looking at two innovative proposals at the cutting-edge of the debate.
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781108953092Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 06 July 2023
References
Adams, Marilyn McCord and Adams, Robert Merrihew. 1990. The Problem of Evil. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, Denis. 2008. Creation or Evolution – Do We Have to Choose? Oxford: Monarch.Google Scholar
Anderson, Gary A. and Bockmuehl, Markus (eds.). 2018. Creation ex nihilo, Origins, Developments, Contemporary Challenges. Notre Dame, IL: University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar
Aquinas, St Thomas. 2020. Summa theologiae. Transl. The Fathers of the English Dominican Province. newadvent.org/summa (accessed September 7 2022)Google Scholar
Barbour, Ian G. 2001. God’s Power: A Process View. In Polkinghorne, John, ed., The Work of Love: Creation as Kenosis. London: SPCK, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl. 1961. Church Dogmatics, Vol. 3 , Part 3, The Doctrine of Creation. Trans. G. W. Bromiley and Ehrlich, R. J., ed. Bromiley, G. W. and Torrance, T. F.. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Bauman, Whitney. 2009. Theology, Creation, and Environmental Ethics: From Creatio Ex Nihilo to Terra Nullius. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Beer, Gillian. 2009. Darwin’s Plots: Evolutionary Narrative in Darwin, George Eliot, and Nineteenth-Century Fiction. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bowker, John. 1970. Problems of Suffering in Religions of the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, Gregory A. 2017. The Crucifixion of the Warrior God, vol. 2. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Brooke, John Hedley. 1991. Science and Religion: Some Historical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burrell, David B., Cogliati, Carlo, Soskice, Janet M., and Stoeger, William R., (eds.). 2010. Creation and the God of Abraham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrus, Virginia. 2019. Ancient Christian Ecopoetics: Cosmologies, Saints, Things. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Cherry, Shai. 2011. Judaism, Darwinism, and the Typology of Suffering. Zygon 46(2), 317–29.Google Scholar
Clayton, Philip and Knapp, Steven. 2011. The Predicament of Belief. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coakley, Sarah. 2001. Kenosis: Theological Meanings and Gender Connotations. In Polkinghorne, John, ed., The Work of Love: Creation as Kenosis. London: SPCK, pp. 192–210.Google Scholar
Coakley, Sarah. 2012. Sacrifice Regained: Evolution, Cooperation and God. www.giffordlectures.org (accessed September 5 2022).Google Scholar
Coakley, Sarah. 2013. Evolution, Cooperation and Divine Providence. In Coakley, Sarah and Nowak, Martin, eds., Evolution, Games and God: The Principle of Cooperation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 375–85.Google Scholar
Cobb, John B. Jr, and Griffin, David Ray. 1976. Process Theology: An Introductory Exposition. Belfast: Christian Journals.Google Scholar
Conti, Alessandro. 2017. John Wyclif. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. www.plato.stanford.edu/John Wyclif (accessed August 14 2022).Google Scholar
Conway Morris, Simon. 2003. Life’s Solution: Inevitable Humans in a Lonely Universe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Conway Morris, Simon. 2022. From Extraterrestrials to Animal Minds: Six Myths of Evolution. West Conshohocken, PA.: Templeton Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. 1856. Letter to J.D. Hooker of July 13 1856. Catalogued as Letter No. 1924, www.darwinproject.ac.uk (accessed August 26 2022).Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. 1860. Letter to Asa Gray of 22 May 1860. Catalogued as Letter No. 2814, www.darwinproject.ac.uk (accessed August 26 2022).Google Scholar
Davison, Andrew. 2018. ‘He Fathers-Forth Whose Beauty Is Past Change,’ but ‘Who Knows How?’: Evolution and Divine Exemplarity. Nova et Vetera, English edition, 16(4), 1067–102.Google Scholar
Davison, Andrew. 2020a. ‘Biological Mutualism: A Scientific Survey’. Theology and Science 18(2), 190–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davison, Andrew. 2020b. ‘Christian Doctrine and Biological Mutualism: Some Explorations in Systematic and Philosophical Theology’. Theology and Science 18(2), 258–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, Richard. 1983. Universal Darwinism. In Bendall, Derek S., ed., Evolution from Molecules to Men. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 403–25.Google Scholar
Deane-Drummond, Celia E. 2009. Christ and Evolution: Wonder and Wisdom. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Deane-Drummond, Celia E. 2018. Perceiving Natural Evil through the Lens of Divine Glory? A Conversation with Christopher Southgate. Zygon 53(3), 792–807.Google Scholar
deGrazia, David. 1996. Taking Animals Seriously: Mental Life and Moral Status. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dembski, William A. 2009. The End of Christianity: Finding a Good God in an Evil World. Nashville, TN: Broadman and Holman.Google Scholar
Dougherty, Trent. 2014. The Problem of Animal Pain: A Theodicy for All Creatures Great and Small. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Draper, Paul. 2012. Darwin’s Argument from Evil. In Nagasawa, Yujin, ed., Scientific Approaches to the Philosophy of Religion. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 49–70.Google Scholar
Edwards, Denis. 2006. Every Sparrow That Falls to the Ground: The Cost of Evolution and the Christ-Event. Ecotheology 11(1), 103–23.Google Scholar
Edwards, Denis. 2018. Christopher Southgate’s Compound Theodicies: Parallel Searchings. Zygon 53(3), 680–90.Google Scholar
Fern, Richard L. 2002. Nature, God and Humanity: Envisioning an Ethics of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fergusson, David. 2018. The Providence of God: A Polyphonic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fiddes, Paul S. 2000. Participating in God: A Pastoral Doctrine of the Trinity. London: Darton, Longman and Todd.Google Scholar
Garvey, Jon. 2019. God’s Good Earth: The Case for an Unfallen Creation. Eugene, OR: Cascade Books.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay. 1989. Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Greene, Brian. 2004. The Fabric of the Cosmos: Space, Time and the Texture of Reality. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Gregersen, Niels Henrik. 2001. The Cross of Christ in an Evolutionary World. Dialog: A Journal of Theology 40(3), 192–207.Google Scholar
Haught, John F. 2004. Deeper than Darwin: The Prospect for Religion in the Age of Evolution. Oxford: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Haught, John F. 2005. The Boyle Lecture 2003: Darwin, Design and the Promise of Nature. Science and Christian Belief 17, 5–20.Google Scholar
Hincks, Adam D. S.J. 2018. What Does Physical Cosmology Say about Creation from Nothing? In Anderson, Gary A. and Bockmuehl, Markus, eds., Creation ex nihilo: Origins, Developments, Contemporary Challenges. Notre Dame, IL: University of Notre Dame, pp. 319–45.Google Scholar
Hoggard Creegan, Nicola. 2013. Animal Suffering and the Problem of Evil. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoggard Creegan, Nicola. 2018. Theodicy: A Response to Christopher Southgate. Zygon 53(3), 808–20.Google Scholar
Illingworth, John R. 1890. The Problem of Pain: Its Bearing on Faith in God. In Gore, Charles, ed., Lux Mundi: A Series of Studies in the Religion of the Incarnation. 3rd ed. London: John Murray, pp. 113–26.Google Scholar
Eva, Jablonka and Lamb, Marion J.. 2014, first published in 2005. Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life, revised ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jonas, Hans. 1996. Mortality and Morality: A Search for Good after Auschwitz. Vogel, L., ed. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Keller, Catherine. 2003. Face of the Deep: A Theology of Becoming. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kenney, John Peter. 2019. On God, the Soul, Evil and the Rise of Christianity. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Kilby, Karen and Davies, Rachel (eds.). 2020. Suffering and the Christian Life. London: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Kojonen, E. V. Rope. 2021. The Compatibility of Evolution and Design. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Leidenhag, Joanna. 2020. Minding Nature: Theological Panpsychism and the Doctrine of Creation. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Michael. 2018a. Theodicy, Fall, and Adam. In Rosenberg, Stanley P., Burdett, Michael, Lloyd, Michael, and van den Toren, Benno eds., Finding Ourselves after Darwin: Conversations on the Image of God, Original Sin, and the Problem of Evil. Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos Press, pp. 244–61.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Michael. 2018b. The Fallenness of Nature: Three Non-Human Suspects. In Rosenberg, Stanley P., Burdett, Michael, Lloyd, Michael, and van den Toren, Benno eds., Finding Ourselves after Darwin: Conversations on the Image of God, Original Sin, and the Problem of Evil. Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos Press, pp. 262–79.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Michael. 2018c. Conclusion to Part 3. In Rosenberg, Stanley P., Burdett, Michael, Lloyd, Michael, and van den Toren, Benno eds., Finding Ourselves after Darwin: Conversations on the Image of God, Original Sin, and the Problem of Evil. Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos Press, pp. 326–30.Google Scholar
Mason, Georgia J. and Lavery, J. Michelle 2022. What Is It Like to Be a Bass? Red Herrings, Fish Pain and the Study of Animal Sentience. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 9, 788289.Google Scholar
May, Gerhard. 1994. Creatio ex nihilo: The Doctrine of ‘Creation out of Nothing’ in Early Christian Thought, trans. A. S. Worrall. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
McDaniel, Jay B. 1989. Of God and Pelicans: A Theology of Reverence for Life. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press.Google Scholar
McDaniel, Jay B. 1998. Can Animal Suffering be Reconciled with Belief in an All-Loving God? In Linzey, Andrew and Yamamoto, Dorothy, eds., Animals on the Agenda: Questions about Animals for Theology and Ethics. London: SCM Press, pp. 161–72.Google Scholar
McFague, Sallie. 2020. Jesus the Christ and Climate Change. In Conradie, Ernst and Koster, Hilda, eds., The T&T Handbook of Christian Theology and Climate Change. London: T&T Clark, pp. 513–23.Google Scholar
McGrath, Alister. 2016. Re-Imagining Nature: The Promise of a Christian Natural Theology. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
McFarland, Ian A. 2014. From Nothing: A Theology of Creation. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Ryan. 2014. Preservation and Protest: Theological Foundations for an Eco-Eschatological Ethics. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Messer, Neil. 2009. Natural Evil after Darwin. In Northcott, Michael S. and Berry, Robert J., eds., Theology after Darwin. Milton Keynes: Paternoster, pp. 139–54.Google Scholar
Messer, Neil. 2020. Science in Theology: Encounters between Science and the Christian Tradition. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Moltmann, Jürgen. 1990. The Way of Jesus Christ: Christology in Messianic Dimensions. Trans. M. Kohl. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
Moritz, Joshua. 2014. Animal Suffering, Evolution and the Origins of Evil: Toward a ‘Free-Creatures Defense’. Zygon 49(2), 348–80.Google Scholar
Murphy, Nancey. 2007. Science and the Problem of Evil: Suffering as a By-Product of a Finely Tuned Cosmos. In Murphy, Nancey, Russell, Robert J., and William, Stoeger S.J., eds., Physics and Cosmology: Scientific Perspectives on the Problem of Evil in Nature. Vatican City: Vatican Observatory, pp. 131–51.Google Scholar
Murray, Michael J. 2008. Nature Red in Tooth and Claw: Theism and the Problem of Animal Suffering. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Murray, Michael J. and Greenberg, Sean. 2013. Leibniz on the Problem of Evil. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. www.plato.stanford.edu (accessed August 26 2022).Google Scholar
Oord, Thomas Jay. 2015. God Always Creates out of Creation in Love: Creatio ex Creatione a Natura Amoris. In Oord, Thomas J., ed., Theologies of Creation: Creatio ex nihilo and Its New Rivals. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 109–22.Google Scholar
Oord, Thomas Jay (ed.) 2015. Theologies of Creation: Creatio ex nihilo and Its New Rivals. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Peacocke, Arthur. 1993. Theology for a Scientific Age: Being and Becoming – Natural, Divine, and Human. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
Peacocke, Arthur. 1998. Biological Evolution – A Positive Theological Appraisal. In Russell, Robert J., Stoeger, William R., S.J. and Ayala, Francisco J., eds., Evolutionary and Molecular Biology: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action. Vatican City: Vatican Observatory, pp. 357–76.Google Scholar
Peacocke, Arthur. 2001. The Cost of New Life. In Polkinghorne, John, ed., The Work of Love: Creation as Kenosis. London: SPCK, pp. 21–42.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Daniel. 2020. Schleiermacher’s Theology of Sin and Nature: Agency, Value and Modern Theology. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, John. 1989. Science and Providence: God’s Interaction with the World. London: SPCK.Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, John. 1998. Belief in God in an Age of Science: The Terry Lectures. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, John. 2005. Exploring Reality: The Intertwining of Science and Religion. London: SPCK.Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, John. 2012. Reflections of a Bottom-Up Thinker. In Watts, Fraser and Knight, Christopher, eds., God and the Scientist: Exploring the Work of John Polkinghorne. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
Ritchie, Sarah Lane. 2019. Divine Action and the Human Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rolston, Holmes III. 1986. Philosophy Gone Wild: Essays in Environmental Ethics. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Rolston, Holmes III. 1988. Environmental Ethics: Duties to and Values in the Natural World. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Rolston, Holmes III. 2001. Kenosis and Nature. In Polkinghorne, John, ed., The Work of Love: Creation as Kenosis. London: SPCK, pp. 43–65.Google Scholar
Rolston, Holmes III. 2006, first published 1987. Science and Religion: A Critical Survey. Philadelphia, PA: Templeton Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Stanley P. 2018. Can Nature be ‘Red in Tooth and Claw’ in the Thought of Augustine? In Rosenberg, Stanley P., Burdett, Michael, Lloyd, Michael, van den Toren, Benno, eds., Finding Ourselves after Darwin: Conversations on the Image of God, Original Sin, and the Problem of Evil. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, pp. 226–43.Google Scholar
Rota, Michael. 2013. The Problem of Evil and Cooperation. In Coakley, Sarah and Nowak, Martin, eds., Evolution, Games and God: The Principle of Cooperation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 362–74.Google Scholar
Rowe, William L. 1990. The Problem of Evil and Varieties of Atheism. In Adams, Marilyn McCord and Adams, Robert Merrihew, eds., The Problem of Evil. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 126–37.Google Scholar
Ruse, Michael. 2001. Can a Darwinian be a Christian? The Relationship between Science and Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, Robert J. 1998. Special Providence and Genetic Mutation: A New Defense of Theistic Evolution. In Russell, Robert J., Stoeger, William R., S.J. and Ayala, Francisco J., eds., Evolutionary and Molecular Biology: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action. Vatican City: Vatican Observatory, pp. 191–223.Google Scholar
Russell, Robert J. 2008. Cosmology: From Alpha to Omega. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Russell, Robert J. 2019. Moving ahead on Christopher Southgate’s Compound Only-Way Theodicy. Theology and Science 17(2), 185–94.Google Scholar
Russell, Robert J., Stoeger, William R., S. J. and Ayala, Francisco J. (eds.). 1998. Evolutionary and Molecular Biology: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action. Vatican City : Vatican Observatory.Google Scholar
Schneider, John R. 2020. Animal Suffering and the Darwinian Problem of Evil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Slootweg, Piet. 2022. Teeth and Talons Whetted for Slaughter: Divine Attributes and Suffering Animals in Historical Perspective. Kampen: Summum.Google Scholar
Sollereder, Bethany. 2019. God, Evolution and Animal Suffering: Theodicy without a Fall. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Southgate, Christopher. 2008. The Groaning of Creation: God, Evolution and the Problem of Evil. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press.Google Scholar
Southgate, Christopher. 2011a. Re-reading Genesis, John, and Job: A Christian’s Response to Darwinism. Zygon 46(2), 365–90.Google Scholar
Southgate, Christopher. 2011b. A Test-Case: Divine Action. In Southgate, Christopher, ed., God, Humanity and the Cosmos: A Textbook in Science and Religion. 3rd ed. London: T&T Clark, pp. 274–312.Google Scholar
Southgate, Christopher. 2014. Does God’s Care Make Any Difference? Theological Reflection on the Suffering of Non-Human Creatures. In Conradie, Ernst M., Bergmann, Sigurd, Deane-Drummond, Celia, and Edwards, Denis, eds., Christian Faith and the Earth: Current Paths and Emerging Horizons in Ecotheology. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 97–114.Google Scholar
Southgate, Christopher. 2015. God’s Creation Wild and Violent, and Our Care of Other Animals. Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith 67, 245–53.Google Scholar
Southgate, Christopher. 2018a. Theology in a Suffering World: Glory and Longing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Southgate, Christopher. 2018b. ‘Free-Process’ and ‘Only Way’ Arguments. In Rosenberg, Stanley, Burdett, Michael, Lloyd, Michael, and van den Toren, Benno, eds., Finding Ourselves after Darwin: Conversations on the Image of God, Original Sin, and the Problem of Evil. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, pp. 293–305.Google Scholar
Southgate, Christopher. 2018c. Response with a Select Bibliography. Zygon 53(3), 909–30.Google Scholar
Southgate, Christopher. 2022. God and a World of Natural Evil: Theology and Science in Hard Conversation. (The 2022 Boyle Lecture.) Zygon 57(4), 1124–34.Google Scholar
Southgate, Christopher. 2023a, forthcoming. Values and Disvalues in Creation. In Goroncy, Jason, ed., The T&T Clark Handbook of the Doctrine of Creation. London: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Southgate, Christopher. 2023b, forthcoming. Science and Theodicy. In Grebe, Matthias and Grössl, Johannes, eds., The T&T Clark Handbook of the Problem of Suffering and Evil. London: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Southgate, Christopher, and Andrew, Robinson. 2007. Varieties of Theodicy: An Exploration of Responses to the Problem of Evil Based on a Typology of Good-Harm Analyses. In Murphy, Nancey, Russell, Robert J., and William, R. Stoeger, S.J., eds., Physics and Cosmology: Scientific Perspectives on the Problem of Evil in Nature. Vatican City: Vatican Observatory, pp. 67–90.Google Scholar
Tanner, Kathryn. 2005. God and Creation in Christian Theology: Tyranny or Empowerment? Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Van Inwagen, Peter. 1995. God, Knowledge, Mystery. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Van Inwagen, Peter 2006. The Problem of Evil: The Gifford Lectures Delivered in the University of St Andrews in 2003. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Von Balthasar, Hans Urs. 1994. Theodrama: Theological Dramatic Theory, Vol IV: The Action. Trans. G. Harrison. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press.Google Scholar
Wahlberg, Mats. 2015. Was Evolution the Only Possible Way for God to Make Autonomous Creatures? Examination of an Argument in Evolutionary Theodicy. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 77, 37–51.Google Scholar
Wesley, John. 1825. The General Deliverance. In Sermons on Several Occasions, Vol II. London: J. Kershaw, pp. 121–32.Google Scholar
Whitehead, Alfred North. 1929. Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wildman, Wesley J. 2007. The Use and Meaning of the Term ‘Suffering’ in Relation to Nature. In Murphy, Nancey, Russell, Robert J., and William, R. Stoeger, S. J., eds., Physics and Cosmology: Scientific Perspectives on the Problem of Evil in Nature. Vatican City: Vatican Observatory, pp. 53–66.Google Scholar
Young, Frances. 2013. God’s Presence: A Contemporary Recapitulation of Early Christianity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- 13
- Cited by