Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Preface
- Chapter 1 Opposed hypotheses about Plato's dialogues
- Chapter 2 Socrates in the Apology
- Chapter 3 Socrates in the digression of the Theaetetus:
- Chapter 4 Socrates in the Republic, part i: speech and counter-speech
- Chapter 5 Socrates in the Republic, part ii: philosophers, forms, Glaucon, and Adeimantus
- Chapter 6 Socrates in the Phaedo: another persuasion assignment
- Chapter 7 Others' conceptions of philosophy in the Euthydemus, Lovers, and Sophist
- Chapter 8 Socrates and Plato in Plato's dialogues
- Chapter 9 Socrates and philosophy
- Bibliography
- Index of passages cited
- General index
Preface
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 May 2011
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Preface
- Chapter 1 Opposed hypotheses about Plato's dialogues
- Chapter 2 Socrates in the Apology
- Chapter 3 Socrates in the digression of the Theaetetus:
- Chapter 4 Socrates in the Republic, part i: speech and counter-speech
- Chapter 5 Socrates in the Republic, part ii: philosophers, forms, Glaucon, and Adeimantus
- Chapter 6 Socrates in the Phaedo: another persuasion assignment
- Chapter 7 Others' conceptions of philosophy in the Euthydemus, Lovers, and Sophist
- Chapter 8 Socrates and Plato in Plato's dialogues
- Chapter 9 Socrates and philosophy
- Bibliography
- Index of passages cited
- General index
Summary
The Socrates of some of Plato's dialogues is the avowedly ignorant figure of the Apology who knows nothing important and who gave his life to examining himself and others. In contrast, the Socrates of other dialogues such as the Republic and Phaedo gives confident lectures on topics of which the examining Socrates of the Apology professed ignorance. It is a long-standing puzzle why Socrates acts so differently in different dialogues.
To explain the two different manners of Socrates a current widely accepted interpretation of Plato's dialogues offers this two-part, Plato-centered, hypothesis: (i) the character Socrates of the dialogues is always Plato's device for presenting Plato's own views; and (ii) Plato had different views at different times. The Socrates who confidently lectures presents these famous four doctrines: Plato's blueprint for the best state, Plato's “Theory of Forms,” Plato's view that philosophy is the knowledge of those Forms that fits the knower for the highest government stations, and Plato's arguments for the immortality of the soul.
To explain Socrates' two different manners this book offers instead an interlocutor-centered hypothesis that the character Socrates, who is permanently convinced that he knows nothing great, has reason to conduct different kinds of examination with different interlocutors. With some, he is the avowedly ignorant questioner. With others, he has reason to appear to be a confident lecturer: the reaction of interlocutors to an apparently confident lecture reveals them. Revealing them is the first step of an examination of them. Throughout Plato's dialogues Socrates' philosophizing centrally involves examining.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Socrates and Philosophy in the Dialogues of Plato , pp. xv - xviPublisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011