Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of abbreviations
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Preface
- 1 Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST): introduction
- 2 The neuropsychology of fear and anxiety: a foundation for Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory
- 3 Animal cognition and human personality
- 4 The behavioural activation system: challenges and opportunities
- 5 Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory and personality
- 6 Reinforcement sensitivity scales
- 7 Performance and conditioning studies
- 8 Psychophysiological studies
- 9 Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory and mood induction studies
- 10 Neuro-imaging and genetics
- 11 Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory and psychosomatic medicine
- 12 RST and clinical disorders: anxiety and depression
- 13 RST and psychopathy: associations between psychopathy and the behavioral activation and inhibition systems
- 14 Behavioural activation and inhibition in social adjustment
- 15 Reinforcement sensitivity in the workplace: BIS/BAS in business
- 16 Formal and computational models of Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory
- 17 Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory: a critique from cognitive science
- 18 The contribution of Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory to personality theory
- General Index
- Index of Names
- References
6 - Reinforcement sensitivity scales
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 January 2011
Edited by
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of abbreviations
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Preface
- 1 Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST): introduction
- 2 The neuropsychology of fear and anxiety: a foundation for Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory
- 3 Animal cognition and human personality
- 4 The behavioural activation system: challenges and opportunities
- 5 Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory and personality
- 6 Reinforcement sensitivity scales
- 7 Performance and conditioning studies
- 8 Psychophysiological studies
- 9 Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory and mood induction studies
- 10 Neuro-imaging and genetics
- 11 Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory and psychosomatic medicine
- 12 RST and clinical disorders: anxiety and depression
- 13 RST and psychopathy: associations between psychopathy and the behavioral activation and inhibition systems
- 14 Behavioural activation and inhibition in social adjustment
- 15 Reinforcement sensitivity in the workplace: BIS/BAS in business
- 16 Formal and computational models of Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory
- 17 Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory: a critique from cognitive science
- 18 The contribution of Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory to personality theory
- General Index
- Index of Names
- References
Summary
Gray's (1970, 1981, 1982) personality theory, currently referred to as the Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST) (Pickering, Díaz and Gray 1995) has defined the existence of three conceptual nervous systems that underlie three orthogonal personality dimensions. These systems reflect brain structures that influence sensitivity to reinforcing events and control the experience of emotion. The best known is the Behavioural Inhibition System (BIS); this system normally functions as a comparator, taking control of behaviour in response to signals of punishment, frustrative non-reward and novel stimuli. In terms of individual differences in personality, the BIS is related to the trait-anxiety dimension. As regards its relationship with Eysenckian dimensions, the BIS runs from the neurotic introvert quadrant (maximum BIS activity) to the stable extravert quadrant (minimum BIS activity). The second system is called the Behavioural Approach System (BAS) and is considered independent of the BIS; this system is responsible for approach behaviour in response to incentives (signals of reward or non-punishment). Individual differences in the functioning of the BAS are related to the impulsivity dimension of personality. This dimension is orthogonal to anxiety, and runs from stable introvert (minimum BAS activity) to neurotic extravert (maximum BAS activity) quadrants. The third system, the Fight-Flight System (FFS) is the most recently proposed of the three (Gray 1987a) and is the least clearly defined. It is activated by the presence of unconditioned aversive stimuli promoting fight or escape behaviour.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of Personality , pp. 188 - 227Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2008
References
(2004), Sensitivity to punishment, sensitivity to reward and sexuality in females, Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 5–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994), Sensitivity to punishment and resistance to extinction: a test of Gray's behavioural inhibition system, Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 845–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001), Distinguishing Behavioural Inhibition System-mediated and Behavioural Approach System-mediated disinhibition mechanisms: a comparison of disinhibition models of Gray and Patterson and Newman, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 311–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (2003), Set–shifting and sensitivity to reward: a dopamine mechanism for explaining disinhibitory disorders, Cognition and Emotion, 17, 951–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1995), Sensitivity to primary or secondary reinforcers, what is the mechanism underlying passive avoidance: deficits in extraverts?, Journal of Research in Personality, 29, 373–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1997), Impulsivity and anxiety differences in cognitive inhibition, Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 1055–1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2001), Personality and inhibitory deficits in the stop-signal task: the mediating role of Gray's anxiety and impulsivity, Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 975–986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2002a), The role of attentional anterior network on threat-related attentional biases in anxiety, Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 715–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2002b), Individual differences in reward sensitivity and attentional focus, Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 979–996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1999), The role of the behavioral inhibition system in the ability to associate aversive stimuli with future rewards, Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 1209–1219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2004), Personality, expectations and response to multiple choice question examinations in university students: a test of Gray's hypotheses, European Journal of Personality, 18, 45–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2006), Personality differences in suppression of behavior as a function of the probability of punishment, Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 249–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1990), Sensation seeking, Eysenck's personality dimensions and reinforcement sensitivity in concept formation, Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 343–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , , and (2006a), Behavioral inhibition system activity is associated with increased amygdala and septo-hippocampal gray matter volume: a voxel-based morphometry study, Neuro Image, 33, 1011–1015Google Scholar
Barrós-Loscertales, A., Meseguer, V., Sanjuán, A., Belloch, V., Parcet, M. A., Torrubia, R. and Ávila, C. (2006b), Striatum gray matter reduction in males with an overactive behavioral activation system (Behavioural Approach System), European Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 2071–2074
(2003), Behavioral inhibition and behavioural activation in young children: relations with self-regulation and adaptation to preschool in children attending head start, Deviant Psychobiology, 42, 301–311CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (2004), Physiological and neuropsychological correlates of approach/withdrawal tendencies in preschool: further examination of the behavioral inhibition system/behavioral activation system scales for young children, Deviant Psychobiology, 45, 113–124CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (2005), A comparison of psychophysiological and self-report measures of Behavioural Approach System and Behavioural Inhibition System activation, Psychophysiology, 42, 108–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , , and (2004), Heightened heart rate response to alcohol intoxication is associated with a reward–seeking personality profile, Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 28, 394–401CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1994), Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: a critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates, Psychological Bulletin, 115, 401–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004), Negative affects derived from the behavioral approach system, Emotion, 4, 3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2000), Responsiveness to threats and incentives, expectancy of recurrence, and distress and disengagement: moderator effects in women with early stage breast cancer, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 965–975CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1994), Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: the Behavioural Inhibition System/Behavioural Approach System scales, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2003), The measurement of individual differences in behavioural inhibition and behavioural activation systems: a comparison of personality scales, Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 999–1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , and (2006), Influence of individual differences in the behavioral inhibition system and stimulus content (fear vs. blood/disgust) on affective startle reflex modulation, Biological Psychology, 72, 251–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2001), Is the behavioural inhibition system the core vulnerability for cluster C personality disorders?, Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 349–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2004), Sensitivity to punishment and sensitivity to reward and traffic violations, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 36, 947–952CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1987), A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants, Archives of General Psychiatry, 44, 573–588CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2004), Gray's reinforcement sensitivity model and child psychopathology: laboratory and questionnaire assessment of the Behavioural Approach System and Behavioural Inhibition System, Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32, 435–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2002), Defining the neural mechanisms of probabilistic reversal learning using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging, Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 4563–4567CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2001), Testing problems in J. A. Gray's personality theory: a commentary on Matthews and Gilliland (1999), Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 333–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004), Reinforcement sensitivity theory and personality, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 28, 317–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , , and (1995), Personality and affective modulation of the startle reflex, Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 543–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998), Affective style and affective disorders: perspectives from affective neuroscience, Cognition and Emotion, 12, 307–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2004), Reward drive and rash impulsiveness as dimensions of impulsivity: implications for substance misuse, Addictive Behaviors, 29, 1389–1405CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and (2005), Effects of emotional visual stimuli on an auditory information processing: a test of J. A. Gray's reinforcement sensitivity theory, Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 163–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1999), Neurobiology of the structure of personality: dopamine, facilitation of incentive motivation, and extraversion, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 491–569CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1993), The relationship between Gray's and Eysenk's personality spaces, Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 297–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1992), Primary trait measurement of the P-E-N system, European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 8, 109–117Google Scholar
and (1964), The Manual of the Eysenck Personality Inventory (London: University of London Press)Google Scholar
and (1975), Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (Junior and Adult), (London: Hodder and Stoughton)Google Scholar
, , and (1985), Age norms for impulsiveness, venturesomeness and empathy in adults, Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 613–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), Behavioural approach system (Behavioural Approach System) sensitivity predicts alcohol craving, Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 349–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2006), Gray's impulsivity dimension: a distinction between reward sensitivity versus rash impulsiveness, Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1337–1347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (2006), Influence of individual differences in behavioral inhibition system on the magnitude and time course of the fear-potentiated startle, International Journal of Psychophysiology, 60, 323–329CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , , , and (2004), High sensitivity to punishment and low impulsivity in obsessive-compulsive patients with hoarding symptoms, Psychiatry Research, 129, 21–27CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , , , , , and (2004), Personality characteristics in obsessive-compulsive disorder and individuals with sub-clinical obsessive-compulsive problems, British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 387–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2000), Behavioral activation and inhibition in everyday life, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1135–1149CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2002), Personality traits of the behavioural approach and inhibition systems: associations with processing of emotional stimuli, Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1299–1316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2005), Convergent, discriminant and concurrent validities of measures of the behavioural approach and behavioural inhibition systems: confirmatory factor analytic approach, Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 87–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1970), The psychophysiological basis of introversion–extraversion, Behavior Research and Therapy, 8, 249–266CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gray, J. A. (1981), A critique of Eysenck's theory of personality. In (ed.), A Model of Personality (New York: Springer), pp. 246–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1987a), The Psychology of Fear and Stress (2nd edn, New York: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
(1987b), Discussion arising from: Cloninger C. R. A unified theory of personality and its role in the development of anxiety states, Psychiatric Developments, 4, 337–394Google Scholar
Gray J. A. (1988), The neuropsychological basis of anxiety in and (eds.), Handbook of Anxiety Disorders (Oxford: Pergamon Press), pp. 10–37Google Scholar
and (2000), The Neuropsychology of Anxiety (2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications)Google Scholar
Gray, J. A., Owen, S., Davis, N. and Tsaltas, E. (1983), Psychological and physiological relations between anxiety and impulsivity, in (ed.), The Biological Bases of Sensation Seeking, Impulsivity and Anxiety (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum), pp. 189–217Google Scholar
and (1989), Verbal operant conditioning as a function of extraversion and reinforcement, British Journal of Psychology, 80, 39–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1997), Behavioral activation sensitivity and resting frontal EEG asymmetry: covariation of putative indicators related to risk for mood disorders, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 159–163CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2003), Affective modulation and prepulse inhibition of startle among undergraduates high and low in behavioural inhibition and approach, Psychophysiology, 40, 131–138CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , and (2004), Behavioural Inhibition System-Behavioural Approach System sensitivity and cardiac autonomic stress profiles, Psychophysiology, 41, 37–45CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and (2003), Behavioural Inhibition System/Behavioural Approach System sensitivity and self-rated affects during experimentally induced stress, Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 943–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1998), A second look at Carver and White's (1994) Behavioural Inhibition System/Behavioural Approach System scales, Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 785–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2004), Appetitive motivation predicts the majority of personality and an ability measure: a comparison of Behavioural Approach System measures and a re-evaluation of the importance of RST, Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1627–1636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2003), Behavioural Inhibition System/Behavioural Approach System levels and psychiatric disorder: an epidemiological study, Journal of Psychophysiology and Behavioral Assessment, 25, 25–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , and (1999), Using the Behavioural Inhibition System/Behavioural Approach System scales to measure behavioural inhibition and behavioural activation: factor structure, validity and norms in a large community sample, Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 49–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2001), The influence of sensitivity to reward on reactivity to alcohol-related cues, Addicton, 96, 1175–1185CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2004), Personality and responses to appetitive and aversive stimuli: the joint influence of behavioural approach and inhibition systems, Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1153–1165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2002), Behavioral activation and inhibition systems and the severity and course of depression, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 589–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2004), Comparison of the construct validity of the Gray-Wilson personality questionnaire and the Behavioural Inhibition System/Behavioural Approach System scales, Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1565–1582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995), The emotion probe: studies of motivation and attention, American Psychologist, 50, 372–85CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , and (2001), Construct validity and generalizability of the Carver-White behavioural inhibition system/behavioural activation system scales, European Journal of Personality, 15, 373–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1991), Gray's behavioural inhibition system: a psychometric examination, Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 157–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2004), Individual differences in the modulation of fear-related brain activation by attentional control, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1683–1694CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2004), A two-dimensional neuropsychology of defense: fear/anxiety and defensive distance, Neuroscience and Behavioral Reviews, 28, 285–305CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (1999), Exploring behavioral activation and behavioral inhibition sensitivities among college students at risk for bipolar spectrum symptomatology, Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 21, 275–292CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (2004), Assessing the component structure of four self–report measures of impulsivity, Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 349–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1987), Reaction to punishment in extraverts and psychopaths: implications for the impulsive behavior of disinhibited individuals, Journal of Research in Personality, 21, 464–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1986), Effects of punishment on response latency in extraverts, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 624–630CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2005), Predicting alcohol patterns in first-year college students through motivational system and reasons for drinking, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 19, 10–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2004), Confirmatory factor analysis of the sensitivity to punishment and sensitivity to reward questionnaire, Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 985–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1987), Reaction to punishment, reflectivity, and passive avoidance learning in extraverts, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 565–575CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and P. (1993), Reflectivity and learning from aversive events: toward a psychological mechanism for syndromes of disinhibition, Psychological Review, 100, 716–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997), The conceptual nervous system and personality: from Pavlov to neural networks, European Psychologist, 2, 139–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1999), Interactions and reinforcement sensitivity theory: a theoretical analysis of Rusting and Larsen (1997), Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 357–365Google Scholar
Pickering, A. D., Corr, P. J., Powell, J. H., Kumari, V., Thornton, J. C. and Gray, J. A. (1997), Individual differences in reactions to reinforcing stimuli are neither black nor white: to what extent are they Gray? in (ed.), The Scientific Study of Human Nature: Tribute to Hans J. Eysenck at Eighty (Oxford: Pergamon), pp. 36–67Google Scholar
, and (1995), Personality and reinforcement: an exploration using a maze-learning task, Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 541–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , and (2006), Behavioural inhibition and behavioural activation systems in current and recovered major depression patients, Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 215–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2004), On the relationship between attention and personality: covert visual orienting of attention in anxiety and impulsivity, Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1471–1481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2004), The assessment of behavioural activation: the relationship between impulsivity and behavioural activation, Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 429–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , , and (2004), Personality and emotion: test of Gray's personality theory by means of an functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging study, Behavioral Neuroscience, 118, 462–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2002), Confirmatory factor analysis of the behavioural inhibition and activation scales, Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 861–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2003), Development of a short form of the Gray-Wilson personality questionnaire: its use in measuring personality and adjustment among Russian adolescents, Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1049–1059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2005), The appetitive motivation scale and other Behavioural Approach System measures in the prediction of approach and active avoidance, Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 981–999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2006), Functional impulsivity and reinforcement sensitivity theory, Journal of Personality, 74, 1–37CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (1970), Manual for the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologist Press)Google Scholar
, , and (2005), Novelty seeking but not Behavioural Approach System is associated with high dopamine as indicated by a neurotransmitter challenge test using mazindol as a challenge substance, Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1597–1608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1997), Prefrontal brain asymmetry: a biological substrate of the behavioral approach and inhibition systems, Psychological Science, 8, 204–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2001), The sensitivity to punishment and sensitivity reward questionnaire (SPSRQ) as a measure of Gray's anxiety and impulsivity dimensions, Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 837–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torrubia, R., Ávila, C., Moltó, J. and Grande, I. (1995), Testing for stress and happiness: the rôle of the behavioral inhibition system, in , , , , and (eds.), Stress and Emotion: Anxiety, Anger, and Curiosity (Washington, DC: Taylor and Francis), vol. 15, pp. 189–211Google Scholar
Torrubia, R., Garcia-Carrillo, M., Ávila, C., Caseras, X. and Grande, I. (in preparation), A junior questionnaire for the measurement of sensitivity to punishment and sensitivity to reward
and (1984), A scale for the assessment of susceptibility to punishment as a measure of anxiety: preliminary results, Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 371–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1986), Behaviour pattern A: reward, fight or punishment?, Personality and Individual Differences, 7, 319–326Google Scholar
and (1990), Differential effects of reward and punishment cues on response speed in anxious and impulsive individuals, Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 999–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1989), Human reactions to reward and punishment: a questionnaire examination of Gray's personality theory, British Journal of Psychology, 80, 509–515CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (1995), Japanese reactions to reward and punishment: a cross-cultural personality study, Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 109–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1990), A factor analysis of the Gray-Wilson personality questionnaire, Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 1037–1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and J. (1999), Susceptibility to affect: a comparison of three personality taxonomies, Journal of Personality, 67, 761–791CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1998), Individual differences in the acquisition of affectively valenced associations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1024–1040CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and (1999), Where do motivational and emotional traits fit within three factor models of personality, Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 487–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21
- Cited by