Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2011
  • Online publication date: November 2011

16 - Biologically constrained action selection improves cognitive control in a model of the Stroop task

from Part II - Computational neuroscience models

Summary

Summary

The Stroop task is a paradigmatic psychological task for investigating stimulus conflict and the effect this has on response selection. The model of Cohen et al. (1990) has hitherto provided the best account of performance in the Stroop task, but there remains certain key data that it fails to match. We show that this failure is due to the mechanism used to perform final response selection – one based on the diffusion model of choice behaviour (Ratcliff, 1978). We adapt the model to use a selection mechanism which is based on the putative human locus of final response selection, the basal ganglia/thalamo-cortical complex (Redgrave et al., 1999). This improves the match to the core human data and, additionally, makes it possible for the model to accommodate, in a principled way, additional mechanisms of cognitive control that enable better fits to the data. This work prompts a critique of the diffusion model as a mechanism of response selection, and the features that any response mechanism must possess to provide adaptive action selection. We conclude that the consideration of biologically constrained solutions to the action selection problem is vital to the understanding and improvement of cognitive models of response selection.

Introduction

The Stroop task provides a thoroughly explored experimental framework for investigating cognitive aspects of selection. In this task, subjects have to name the ink colour of word-strings which can themselves spell out the name of a colour. When the ink-colour and the word-name contradict each other response selection is slowed and is more prone to error (compared to conditions where the word-name is neutral or is congruent with respect to the ink-colour). This is ‘the Stroop Effect’. A simple reversal of the task, that of reading the word-name and ignoring the ink-colour, does not produce an opposite effect (a ‘reverse Stroop’ effect).

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
References
Albin, R. L.Young, A. B.Penney, J. B. 1989 The functional anatomy of basal ganglia disordersTrends Neurosci 12 366
Alexander, G. E.Crutcher, M. D. 1990 Functional architecture of basal ganglia circuits: neural substrates of parallel processingTrends Neurosci. 13 266
Alexander, G. E.Delong, M. R.Strick, P. L. 1986 Parallel organization of functionally segregated circuits linking basal ganglia and cortexAnnu. Rev. Neurosci. 9 357
Arbib, M. 1995 Introducing the neuronThe Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural NetworksArbib, M.Cambridge, MAMIT Press266
Balleine, B. W.Lijeholm, M.Ostlund, S. B. 2009 The integrative function of the basal ganglia in instrumental conditioningBehav. Brain Res. 199 43
Besner, D.Stolz, J. 1999 Context dependency in Stroop's paradigm: when are words treated as nonlinguistic objectsCan. J. Exp. Psychol 53 374
Besner, D.Stolz, J. A.Boutilier, C. 1997 The Stroop effect and the myth of automaticityPsychon. Bull. Rev. 4 221
Blais, C.Besner, D. 2007 A reverse Stroop effect without translation or reading difficultyPsychon. Bull. Rev. 14 466
Bogacz, R.Brown, E.Moehlis, J.Holmes, P.Cohen, J. D. 2006 The physics of optimal decision making: a formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasksPsychol. Rev. 113 700
Bogacz, R.Gurney, K. 2007 The basal ganglia and cortex implement optimal decision making between alternative actionsNeural Comput. 19 442
Botvinick, M. M 2007 Conflict monitoring and decision making: reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate functionCogn. Aff. Behav. Neurosci. 7 356
Botvinick, M. M.Braver, T. S.Barch, D. M.Carter, C. S.Cohen, J. D. 2001 Conflict monitoring and cognitive controlPsychol. Rev. 108 624
Botvinick, M. M.Cohen, J. D.Carter, C. S. 2004 Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an updateTrends Cogn. Sci. 8 539
Brown, L. L.Schneider, J. S.Lidsky, T. I. 1997 Sensory and cognitive functions of the basal gangliaCurr. Opin. Neurobiol. 7 157
Chelazzi, L.Duncan, J.Miller, E. K.Desimone, R. 1998 Responses of neurons in inferior temporal cortex during memory-guided visual searchJ. Neurophysiol. 80 2918
Chevalier, G.Deniau, J. 1990 Disinhibition as a basic process in the expression of striatal functionsTrends Neurosci. 13 277
Cohen, J. D.Dunbar, K.McClelland, J. L. 1990 On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed-processing account of the Stroop effectPsychol. Rev 97 332
Cohen, J. D.Huston, T. A. 1994 Progress in the use of interactive models for understanding attention and performanceAttention and Performance 15 453
Dishon-Berkovits, M.Algom, D. 2000 The Stroop effect: it is not the robust phenomenon that you have thought it to beMem. Cogn. 28 1437
Dunbar, K.MacLeod, C. M. 1984 A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed wordsJ. Exp. Psychol. Human 10 623
Durgin, F. H. 2000 The reverse Stroop effectPsychon. Bull. Rev. 7 121
Ellis, R.Humphreys, G. 1999 Connectionist Psychology: A Text with ReadingsHove, UKPsychology Press Ltd
Gerfen, C. R.Engber, T. M.Mahan, L. C. 1990 D1 and D2 dopamine receptor regulated gene expression of striatonigral and striatopallidal neuronsScience 250 1429
Gerfen, C. R.Young, W. S. 1988 Distribution of striatonigral and striatopallidal peptidergic neurons in both patch and matrix compartments: an in situ hybridization histochemistry and fluorescent retrograde tracing studyBrain Res. 460 161
Girard, B.Cuzin, V.Guillot, A.Gurney, K. N.Prescott, T. J. 2003 A basal ganglia inspired model of action selection evaluated in a robotic survival taskJ. Integr. Neurosci 2 179
Glaser, M. O.Glaser, W. R. 1982 Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenonJ. Exp. Psychol. Human 8 875
Gold, J. I.Shadlen, M. N. 2000 Representation of a perceptual decision in developing oculomotor commandsNature 404 390
Gold, J. I.Shadlen, M. N. 2007 The neural basis of decision makingAnnu. Rev. Neurosci. 30
Gurney, K.Prescott, T. J.Redgrave, P. 2001 A computational model of action selection in the basal ganglia I: a new functional anatomyBiol. Cybern. 85 401
Gurney, K.Prescott, T. J.Redgrave, P. 2001 A computational model of action selection in the basal ganglia: II: analysis and simulation of behaviourBiol. Cybern. 85 411
Herd, S. A.Banich, M. T.O’Reilly, R. C. 2006 Neural mechanisms of cognitive control: an integrative model of Stroop task performance and fMRI dataJ. Cogn. Neurosci 18 22
Hoover, J. E.Strick, P. L. 1993 Multiple output channels in the basal gangliaScience 259 819
Humphries, M. D.Gurney, K. N. 2002 The role of intra-thalamic and thalamocortical circuits in action selectionNetwork-Comp. Neural 13 131
Kha, H. T.Finkelstein, D. I.Tomas, D. 2001 Projections from the substantia nigra pars reticulata to the motor thalamus of the rat: single axon reconstructions and immunohistochemical studyJ. Comp. Neurol. 440 20
Logan, G. 1988 Toward an instance theory of automatizationPsychol. Rev 95 492
Luce, R. 1986 Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental OrganisationNew YorkClarendon Press
MacLeod, C. 1991 Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative reviewPsychol. Bull. 109 163
MacLeod, C.MacDonald, P. 2000 Interdimensional interference in the Stroop effect: uncovering the cognitive and neural anatomy of attentionTrends Cogn. Sci 4 383
May, C. P.Kane, M. J.Hasher, L. 1995 Determinants of negative primingPsychol. Bull. 118 35
McHaffie, J. G.Stanford, T. R.Stein, B. E.Coizet, V.Redgrave, P. 2005 Subcortical loops through the basal gangliaTrends Neurosci. 28 401
Middleton, F. A.Strick, P. L. 2002 Basal-ganglia ‘projections’ to the prefrontal cortex of the primateCereb. Cortex 12 926
Mink, J. W. 1996 The basal ganglia: focused selection and inhibition of competing motor programsProg. Neurobiol. 50 381
Mink, J. W.Thach, W. T. 1993 Basal ganglia intrinsic circuits and their role in behaviorCurr. Opin. Neurobiol. 3 950
Opris, I.Bruce, C. J. 2005 Neural circuitry of judgment and decision mechanismsBrain Res. Rev. 48 509
O’Reilly, R. C.Munakata, Y. 2000 Computational Explorations in Cognitive Neuroscience: Understanding the Mind by Simulating the BrainCambridge, MAMIT Press
Parent, A.Hazrati, L. N. 1993 Anatomical aspects of information processing in primate basal gangliaTrends Neurosci. 16 111
Parent, A.Hazrati, L. N. 1995 Functional anatomy of the basal ganglia. 1. the cortico-basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical loopBrain Res. Rev. 20 91
Phaf, R. H.Vanderheijden, A. H. C.Hudson, P. T. W. 1990 Slam: a connectionist model for attention in visual selection tasksCogn. Psychol. 22 273
Platt, M. 2002 Neural correlates of decisionsCurr. Opin. Neurobiol. 12 141
Posner, M.Snyder, C. 1975 Attention and cognitive controlInformation Processing and CognitionSolso, R.Hillsdale, NJErlbaum55
Prescott, T. J.Montes Gonzalez, F. M.Gurney, K.Humphries, M. D.Redgrave, P. 2006 A robot model of the basal ganglia: behavior and intrinsic processingNeural Networks 19 31
Prescott, T. J.Redgrave, P.Gurney, K. 1999 Layered control architectures in robots and vertebratesAdapt. Behav. 7 99
Price, J. 1995 ThalamusThe Rat Nervous SystemPaxinos, G.New YorkAcademic629
Ratcliff, R. 1978 A theory of memory retrievalPsychol. Rev. 85 59
Ratcliff, R.Cherian, A.Segraves, M. 2003 A comparison of macaque behavior and superior colliculus neuronal activity to predictions from models of two-choice decisionsJ. Neurophysiol. 90 1392
Ratcliff, R.McKoon, G. 2008 The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasksNeural Comput. 20 873
Ratcliff, R.Smith, P. 2004 A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction timePsychol. Rev. 111 333
Reddi, B.Asrress, K.Carpenter, R. 2003 Accuracy, information, and response time in a saccadic decision taskJ. Neurophysiol. 90 3538
Redgrave, P.Prescott, T. J.Gurney, K. 1999 The basal ganglia: a vertebrate solution to the selection problemNeuroscience 89 1009
Sharkey, A.Sharkey, N. 1995 Cognitive modeling: psychology and connectionismThe Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural NetworksArbib, M.Cambridge, MAMIT Press200
Smith, Y.Bevan, M. D.Shink, E.Bolam, J. P. 1998 Microcircuitry of the direct and indirect pathways of the basal gangliaNeuroscience 86 353
Smith, P.Ratcliff, R. 2004 Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisionsTrends Neurosci. 27 161
Stafford, T. 2003 http://www.abrg.group.shef.ac.uk/
Stafford, T.Gurney, K. 2004 The role of response mechanisms in determining reaction time performance: Piéron's law revisitedPsychon. Bull. Rev. 11 975
Stafford, T.Gurney, K. 2007 Biologically constrained action selection improves cognitive control in a model of the Stroop taskPhil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B. 362 1671
Usher, M.McClelland, J. L. 2001 The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator modelPsychol. Rev. 108 550
Yehene, E.Meiran, N.Soroker, N. 2008 Basal ganglia play a unique role in task switching within the frontal-subcortical circuits: evidence from patients with focal lesionsJ. Cogn. Neurosci. 20 1079
Zhang, H. Z. H.Zhang, J.Kornblum, S. 1999 A parallel distributed processing model of stimulus–stimulus and stimulus–response compatibilityCogn. Psychol. 38 386