Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T07:52:34.684Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 24 - Insect management with physical methods in pre- and post-harvest situations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2010

By
Charles Vincent ,
Phyllis G. Weintraub ,
Guy J. Hallman  and
Francis Fleurat-Lessard
Edited by
Edward B. Radcliffe ,
William D. Hutchison  and
Rafael E. Cancelado
Edward B. Radcliffe
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
William D. Hutchison
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Get access

Summary

In theory, IPM programs should be an optimal blend of science (knowledge) and technologies – used concomitantly or sequentially – to manage pests below an economic injury level. There are five main approaches available to achieve that goal: chemical control (synthetic and naturally derived), biological control (predators, parasitoids and pathogens), cultural control (including cover crops and genetically resistant plants), physical control and human factors (legal restrictions on commodities, quarantines, etc.) (Vincent et al., 2003). In practice, few technologies are blended into most pest management programs. For both pre- and post-harvest pest control, the primary approach worldwide is chemical/fumigation (Fields & White, 2002). Like any technology, chemical control has its merits and limits; the development of resistance to pesticides by some arthropod populations, environmental contamination and tightening of regulations in registration and restrictions of use are among factors that limit the use of chemical control measures. However, human factors are playing an effective role in movement towards truly integrated control programs. For example, there have been new regulations enacted in North America (US Food and Drug Administration, 2004) and the European Economic Community (European Union, 2002) for hygienic food quality and safety (Table 24.1). According to these new legislative measures, every food or feed product destined for trade must be free of arthropod pests. This requirement is the standard for food sanitary quality and hygiene of general application in international exchanges as established by the World Trade Organization (WTO).

Physical control methods have been used for millennia.

Type
Chapter
Information
Integrated Pest Management
Concepts, Tactics, Strategies and Case Studies
 , pp. 309 - 323
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

,Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (2007). Treatment Manual. Washington, DC and Riverdale, MD: US Department of Agriculture. Available at www.aphis.usda.gov/import_export/plants/manuals/ ports/downloads/ treatment.pdfGoogle Scholar
Banks, H. J. (1976). Physical control of insects: recent developments. Journal of the Australian Entomological Society, 15, 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, H. J. & Fields, P. G. (1995). Physical methods for insect control in stored grain ecosystems. In Stored-Grain Ecosystems, eds. Jayas, D. S., White, N. D. G. & Muir, W. E., pp. 353–409. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Beckett, S. J., Longstaff, B. C. & Evans, D. E. (1994). A comparison of the demography of four major stored grain coleopteran pest species and its implications for pest management. In Proceedings of the 6th International Working Conference on Stored Product Protection, vol. 1, eds. Highley, E., Wright, E. J., Banks, H. J. & Champ, B. R., pp. 491–497. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
Benoit, D. L., Vincent, C. & Chouinard, G. (2006). Management of weeds, apple sawfly (Hoplocampa testudinea Klug) and plum curculio (Conotrachelus nenuphar Herbst) with cellulose sheets. Crop Protection, 25, 331–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, S. D., Smith, R. F., Vincent, C.et al. (2001). Hymenopterous parasites associated with Phyllonorycter blancardella (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) in Nova Scotia and Quebec. Phytoprotection, 82, 65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davey, P. M. & Amos, T. G. (2006). Testing of paper and other sack materials for penetration by insects which infest stored products. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 12, 177–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dermott, T. & Evans, D. E. (1978). An evaluation of fluidized-bed heating as a means of disinfesting wheat. Journal of Stored Product Research, 14, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupuis, A. S., Fuzeau, B. & Fleurat-Lessard, F. (2006). Feasibility of French beans disinfestation based on freezing intolerance of post-embryonic stages of Acanthoscelides obtectus (Say) (Col.: Bruchidae). In Proceedings of the 9th International Working Conference on Stored Product Protection, eds. Lorini, I., Bacaltchuk, B., Beckel, H.et al., pp. 956–965. Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil: Brazilian Post-Harvest Association (ABRAPOS).Google Scholar
,European Union (2002). Regulation (EC) 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20/01/02 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Authority, and laying down procedures in matters of food safety. Official Journal of the European Communities L 31 01/02/02.
,Food and Drug Administration (2004). Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. Available at www.fda.gov/opacom/laws/fdcact/fdctoc/htm.Google Scholar
Fields, P. G. (1992). The control of stored-product insects and mites with extreme temperatures. Journal of Stored Product Research, 28, 89–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fields, P. G. & White, N. D. G. (2002). Alternatives to methyl bromide treatments for stored-product and quarantine insects. Annual Review of Entomology, 47, 331–359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fields, P. G., Korunic, Z. & Fleurat-Lessard, F. (2001). Control of insects in post-harvest: inert dusts and mechanical means. In Physical Control Methods in Plant Protection, eds. Vincent, C., Panneton, B. & Fleurat-Lessard, F., pp. 248–257. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleurat-Lessard, F. (1990). Effect of modified atmospheres on insects and mites infesting stored products. In Food Preservation by Modified Atmospheres, eds. Calderon, M. & Barkai, R., pp. 21–38. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Fleurat-Lessard, F. (2004). Stored grain: pest management. In Encylopedia of Grain Science, eds. Wrigley, C., Corke, H. & Walker, C., pp. 244–254. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleurat-Lessard, F. (2005). Ecophysiological basis of insect physical control methods. In Phytosanitary Challenge for Agriculture and Environment, ed. Regnault-Roger, C., pp. 787–804. Paris, France: Paris Lavoisier Technique et Documentation (in French).Google Scholar
Fleurat-Lessard, F. & Torc'h, J.-M. (2001). Control of insects in postharvest: high temperature and inert atmospheres. In Physical Control Methods in Plant Protection, eds. Vincent, C., Panneton, B. & Fleurat-Lessard, F., pp. 74–94. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flinn, P. W. & Hagstrum, D. W. (1990). Stored grain advisor: a knowledge-based system for management of insect pests of stored grain. AI Applications in Natural Resource Management, 4, 44–52.Google Scholar
Flinn, P., Opit, G. P. & Throne, J. E. (2006). Integrating the stored grain advisor Pro expert system with an automated electronic grain probe trapping system. In Proceedings of the 9th International Working Conference on Stored Product Protection, eds. Lorini, I., Bacaltchuck, B., Beckel, H.et al., pp. 408–413. Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil: Brazilian Post-Harvest Association (ABRAPOS).Google Scholar
Franck, A. & Bar-Joseph, M. (1992). Use of netting and whitewash spray to protect papaya plants against Nivun–Haamir (NH)-die back disease. Crop Protection, 11, 525–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenn, D. M., Puterka, G. J., Vanderzwet, T., Byers, R. E. & Feldhake, C. (1999). Hydrophobic particle films: a new paradigm for suppression of arthropod pests and plant diseases. Journal of Economic Entomology, 92, 759–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallman, G. J. (1997). Mortality of Mexican fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) immatures in coated grapefruits. Florida Entomologist, 80, 324–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallman, G. J. (2001). Irradiation as a quarantine treatment. In Food Irradiation: Principles and Applications, ed. Molins, R. A., pp. 113–130. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Hallman, G. J. (2007). Phytosanitary measures to prevent the introduction of invasive species. In Biological Invasions, ed. Nentwig, W., pp. 367–384. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Hallman, G. J. & Denlinger, D. L. (eds.) (1998). Temperature Sensitivity in Insects and Application in Integrated Pest Management. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Katan, J. (1981). Solar heating (solarization) of soil for control of soilborne pests. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 19, 211–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katan, J., Greenberger, A., Alon, H. & Grinstein, A. (1976). Solar heating by polyethylene mulching for the control of diseases caused by soil-borne pathogens. Phytopathology, 66, 683–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khelifi, M., Laguë, C. & Lacasse, B. (2001). Pneumatic control of insects in plant protection. In Physical Control Methods in Plant Protection, eds. Vincent, C., Panneton, B. & Fleurat-Lessard, F., pp. 261–269. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, A. L., Unruh, T. R., Christianson, B. A., Puterka, G. J. & Glenn, D. M. (2000). Effects of a kaolin-based particle film on obliquebanded leafroller (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 93, 744–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacasse, B., Laguë, C., Roy, P.-M.et al. (2001). Pneumatic control of agricultural pests. In Physical Control Methods in Plant Protection, eds. Vincent, C., Panneton, B. & Fleurat-Lessard, F., pp. 282–293. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapointe, S. L. (2000). Particle film deters oviposition by Diaprepes abbreviatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 93, 1459–1463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasseran, J. C., Niquet, G. & Fleurat-Lessard, F. (1994). Quality enhancement of stored grain by improved design and management of aeration. In Proceedings of the 6th International Working Conference on Stored Product Protection, vol. 1, eds. Highley, E., Wright, E. J., Banks, H. J., pp. 296–299. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
Longstaff, B. C. & Cornish, P. (1994). PestMan: a decision support system for pest management in the Australian grain-handling system. AI Applications in Natural Resource Management, 8, 13–23.Google Scholar
Mani, S., White, N. D. G., Jayas, D. S.et al. (2001). Canadian Storage Guidelines for Cereals and Oilseeds (CanStore©): An Expert System for Agricultural Producers and Elevator Managers (modified March 3, 2003). Available at http://sci.agr.ca/winnipeg/canstoronweb/cotw_e.htm.
Ndiaye, A. (2001). QualiS: An Expert System Shell for Maintenance of Stored Grain Initial Quality, Copyright 001.290023.00. Paris, France: Agence pour la Protection des Programmes.Google Scholar
Nelson, S. O. (1996). Review and assessment of radio frequency and microwave energy for stored-grain insect control. Transactions of American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 39, 1475–1484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nissen, R. J., George, A. P., Waite, G., Lloyd, A. & Hamacek, E. (2005a). Innovative new production systems for low-chill stonefruit in Australia and South-East Asia: a review. Acta Horticulturae, 694, 247–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nissen, R. J., George, A. P. & Topp, B. L. (2005b). Producing super sweet and firm peaches and nectarines. Acta Horticulturae, 694, 311–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oseto, C. Y. (2000). Physical control of insects. In Insect Pest Management, eds. Rechcigl, J. E. & Rechcigl, N. A., pp. 25–100. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers.Google Scholar
Perrings, C., Williamson, M. & Dalmazzone, S. (eds.) (2000). The Economics of Biological Invasions. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinkerton, J. N., Ivors, K. L., Miller, M. L. & Moore, L. W. (2000). Effect of soil solarization and cover crops on populations of selected soilborne plant pathogens in Western Oregon. Plant Disease, 84, 952–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puterka, G. J., Glenn, D. M., Sekutowski, D. G., Unruh, T. R. & Jones, S. K. (2000). Progress toward liquid formulations of particle films for insect and disease control in pear. Environmental Entomology, 29, 329–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russo, A., Candida Vasta, M., Verdone, A. & Eros Coccuzza, G. (2002). The use of light traps for monitoring flies in a cheese industry in Sicily. IOBC/WPRS Bulletin, 25, 99–104.Google Scholar
Sinha, R. N. & Watters, F. L. (1985). Insect Pests of Flour Mills, Grain Elevators, and Feed Mills and their Control, Publication No. 1776. Ottawa, Canada: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada General Directorate.Google Scholar
Stratil, H., Wohlgemuth, R., Bolling, H. & Zwingelberg, H. (1987). Optimization of the impact machine method of killing and removing insect pests from foods, with particular reference to quality of flour products. Getreide, Mehl und Brot, 41, 294–302.Google Scholar
Sutherst, R. W. & Maywald, G. F. (1985). A computerized system for matching climates in ecology. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 13, 281–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamietti, G. & Valentino, D. (2001). Soil solarization: a useful tool for control of Verticillium wilt and weeds in eggplant crops under plastic in the Po valley. Journal of Plant Pathology, 83, 173–180.Google Scholar
Thomas, A. L, Muller, M. E., Dodson, B. R., Ellersieck, M. R. & Kaps, M. (2004). A kaolin-based particle film suppresses certain insect and fungal pests while reducing heat stress in apples. Journal of the American Pomology Society, 58, 42–51.Google Scholar
Unruh, T. R., Knight, A. L., Upton, J., Glenn, D. M. & Puterka, G. J. (2000). Particle films for suppression of the codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in apple and pear orchards. Journal of Economic Entomology, 93, 737–743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vincent, C. (2002). Pneumatic control of agricultural insect pests. In Encyclopedia of Pest Management, ed. Pimentel, D., pp. 639–641. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Vincent, C. & Boiteau, G. (2001). Pneumatic control of agricultural insect pests. In Physical Control Methods in Plant Protection, eds. Vincent, C., Panneton, B. & Fleurat-Lessard, F., pp. 270–281. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, C., Panneton, B. & Fleurat-Lessard, F. (eds.) (2001). Physical Control in Plant Protection. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, C., Hallman, G., Panneton, B. & Fleurat-Lessard, F. (2003). Management of agricultural insects with physical control methods. Annual Review of Entomology, 48, 261–281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vincent, C., Rancourt, B. & Carisse, O. (2004). Apple leaf shredding as a non-chemical tool to manage apple scab and spotted tentiform leafminer. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 104, 595–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, S.-J., Tang, J.-M., Cavalieri, R. P. & Davis, D. (2003). Differential heating of insects in dried nuts and fruits associated with radiofrequency and microwave treatments. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 46, 1175–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weintraub, P. G. & Berlinger, M. (2004). Physical control in greenhouses and field crops. In Novel Approaches to Insect Pest Management, eds. Horowitz, A. R. & Ishaaya, I., pp. 301–318. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weintraub, P. G. & Horowitz, A. R. (2001). Vacuuming insects pests: the Israeli experience. In Physical Control Methods in Plant Protection, eds. Vincent, C., Panneton, B.Fleurat-Lessard, F., pp. 294–302. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkin, D. R. & Mumford, J. D. (1994). Decision support system for integrated management of stored commodities. In Proceedings of the 6th International Working Conference on Stored Product Protection, vol. 2, eds. Highley, E., Wright, E. J., Banks, H. J. & Champ, B. R., pp. 879–883. Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
Williams, R. H., Hook, S. C. W., Parker, C. G.et al. (2006). GrainPlan: development of a practical tool to improve grain storage on UK farms – knowledge transfer in action. In Proceedings of the 9th International Working Conference on Stored Product Protection, eds. Lorini, I., Bacaltchuck, B., Beckel, H.et al., pp. 1206–1211. Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil: Brazilian Post-Harvest Association (ABRAPOS).Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×