Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 6
  • Print publication year: 2010
  • Online publication date: July 2014

9 - Agency in global climate governance

Summary

Introduction

It has almost become a truism that global climate governance is about more than bargaining among governments within the United Nations climate convention. For many observers of the climate negotiations, side-events have been for some time as interesting as the official negotiations. Already around the Kyoto negotiations of 1997 many important activities took place in parallel with the official negotiations among governments. The idea of side-events had diffused from the forums of non-governmental organizations that had accompanied the series of high-level UN conferences in the early 1990s.

A brief glance at the numerous side-events at any conference of the parties may serve as an illustration of the multiplicity and complexity of contemporary climate governance and, consequently, can help to illuminate from where ideas about ‘agency beyond the state’ have emerged. Already at the fourth conference of the parties in Buenos Aires in 1998, the insurance industry held seminars on the increased frequency and costs of extreme weather events. The Climate Action Network drew media attention to its ‘Fossil of the Day Award’ and organized seminars on justice and equity with regard to emissions of greenhouse gases. The Global Commons Institute presented early work on ‘contraction and convergence’ as an approach to stabilize atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases through converging per capita emissions. In several workshops, academics and policy advisors debated the implications of the newly launched Clean Development Mechanism. The nuclear power industry and the wind power industry both presented their low-carbon technologies, and the city of Curitiba held an exhibition about its public transport system as a best practice of transport-related energy efficiency. This ‘social forum’ of climate-related activities was crowded and energetic. It was, of course, much smaller and less organized compared to, for example, later meetings in Bali (2007) and Poznań (2008), where the daily Earth Negotiations Bulletin had a specific coverage of a sample of side-events.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
References
Arendt, H. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Arts, B. 2005. ‘Non-state actors in global environmental governance: new arrangements beyond the state’, in Koenig-Archibugi, M. and Zürn, M. (eds.), New Modes of Governance in the Global System: Exploring Publicness, Delegation and Inclusiveness. New York: Palgrave, pp. 177–200.
Beacroft, M. 2007. ‘Defining political theory: an Arendtian approach to difference in the public realm’, Politics 27: 40–47.
Breitmeier, H., Young, O. R. and Zürn, M. 2006. Analyzing International Environmental Regimes: From Case Study to Database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bull, H. 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Bull, H. 1981. ‘Hobbes and the international anarchy’, Social Research 48: 717–738.
Cutler, A. C., Haufler, V. and Porter, T. 1999. Private Authority and International Affairs. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Dingwerth, K. and Pattberg, P. 2006. ‘Global governance as a perspective on world politics’, Global Governance 12: 185–203.
Ferguson, Y. H. and Mansbach, R. W. 1996. Polities: Authority, Identities and Change. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
Ferguson, Y. H. and Mansbach, R. W. 2004. Remapping Global Politics: History’s Revenge and Future Shock. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hall, R. B. and Biersteker, T. J. 2002a. The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hall, R. B. and Biersteker, T. J. 2002b. ‘The emergence of private authority in the international system’, in Hall, R. B. and Biersteker, T. J. (eds.), The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–22.
Hardin, G. 1968. ‘The tragedy of the commons’, Science 162: 1243–1248.
Hurd, I. 1999. ‘Legitimacy and authority in international politics’, International Organization 53: 379–408.
Jagers, S. C. and Stripple, J. 2003. ‘Climate governance beyond the state’, Global Governance 9: 385–399.
Keohane, R. O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Keohane, R. O. and Nye, J. S. 1972. Transnational Relations and World Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Keohane, R. O. and Nye, J. S. 1977. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Mitchell, R. B. 2002. ‘International environment’, in Carlsnaes, W., Risse, T. and Simmons, B. A. (eds.), Handbook of International Relations. London: Sage Publications, pp. 500–516.
Pattberg, P. and Stripple, J. 2008. ‘Beyond the public and private divide: remapping transnational climate governance in the 21st century’, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 8: 367–388.
Risse-Kappen, T. 1995. ‘Bringing transnational relations back in: introduction’, in Risse-Kappen, T. (ed.), Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures and International Institutions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–35.
Rosenau, J. N. 1990. Turbulence in World Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rosenau, J. N. 1995. ‘Governance in the twenty-first century’, Global Governance 1, 13–43.
Rosenau, J. N. 1997. Along the Domestic–Foreign Frontier: Exploring Governance in a Turbulent World. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Rosenau, J. N. and Czempiel, E. O. 1992. Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ruggie, J. G. 2004. ‘Reconstituting the global public domain: issues, actors, practices’, European Journal of International Relations 10: 499–541.
Sending, J. O. and Neumann, B. I. 2006. ‘Governance to governmentality: analysing NGOs, states, and power’, International Studies Quarterly 50: 651–672.
Stripple, J. 2006. ‘Rules for the environment: reconsidering authority in global environmental governance’, European Environment 16: 259–264.
Thynne, I. 2008. ‘Climate change, governance and environmental services: institutional perspectives, issues and challenges’, Public Administration and Development 28: 327–339.
Vogler, J. 2001. ‘Future directions: the atmosphere as a global commons’, Atmospheric Environment 35: 2427–2428.
World Commission on Environment and Development 1987. Our Common Future. New York: United Nations.