Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Print publication year: 2017
  • Online publication date: July 2017

4 - Governance of Benefits and Risks of GMOs in Developing Countries

from Part I - Risk Analysis Methodology and Decision-Making

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Arvidsson, G. (2015). Food security now or wait for research to assess risks? Genetically modified crops and smallholder farmers in Africa. Nordiska Afrikainstitutet Policy Note 3.
Brookes, G. and Barfoot, P. (2016). GM Crops: Global Socio-economic and Environmental Impacts 1996–2014. Dorchester: PG Economics Ltd.
Burachik, M. (2010). Experience from use of GMOs in Argentinian agriculture, economy and environment. New Biotechnology 27(5), 588592.
CAC (2007). Working principles for risk analysis for food safety for application by governments. CAC/GL 62–2007.
Convention on Biological Diversity (2000). Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Text and Annexes. [Online]. Available from www.cbd.int/doc/legal/cartagena-protocol-en.pdf
Convention on Biological Diversity (2012). Guidance on risk assessment of living modified organisms. UNEP/CBD/BS/COP-MOP/6/13/Add.1. [Online]. Available from www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/bs/mop-06/official/mop-06-13-add1-en.pdf
Convention on Biological Diversity (2015). Guidance on risk assessment of living modified organisms and monitoring in the context of risk assessment. UNEP/CBD/BS/RARM/AHTEG/2015/1/4. [Online]. Available from www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/bs/bsrarm-ahteg-2015-01/official/bsrarm-ahteg-2015-01-04-en.pdf
European Food Safety Authority (2006). Guidance document of the scientific panel on genetically modified organisms for the risk assessment of genetically modified plants and derived food and feed. EFSA Journal 99, 1100.
Falck-Zepeda, J. et al. (2013). The current status of the debate on socio-economic regulatory assessments: positions and policies in Canada, the USA, the EU and developing countries. World Review of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development 10(4), 203207.
FAO/WHO (1998). The application of risk communication to food standards and safety matters. [Online]. Available from www.fao.org/docrep/005/x1271e/X1271E01.htm
Fischer, K. et al. (2015). Social impacts of GM crops in agriculture: a systematic literature review. Sustainability 7(7), 85988620.
FoodRisC (2015). Website of the project ‘Perceptions and communication of food risk/benefits across Europe’. [Online]. Available from www.foodrisc.org
Frewer, L. J. et al. (1998). Consumer acceptance of transgenic crops. Pesticide Science 52, 388393.
Herman, R. A. et al. (2013). Bringing policy relevance and scientific discipline to environmental risk assessment for genetically modified crops. Trends in Biotechnology 31(9), 493496.
IRRI (undated). What is the status of the Golden Rice project coordinated by IRRI? [Online]. Available from http://irri.org/golden-rice/faqs/what-is-the-status-of-the-golden-rice-project-coordinated-by-irri
Kamanga, G. D. et al. (2014). Why communication and issues management (CIMS) must occupy a central role in GM projects: case study of the Africa Biofortified Sorghum (ABS) Project. In Biotechnology in Africa: Emergence, Initiatives and Future, ed. Wambugu, F. and Kamanga, D.. Basel: Springer International Publishing Switzerland, pp. 225241.
Ludlow, K. et al. (2013). Socio-economic Considerations in Biotechnology Regulation. Berlin: Springer Science and Business Media.
Marcoux, J.-M. et al. (2013). The inclusion of nonsafety criteria within the regulatory framework of agricultural biotechnology: exploring factors that are likely to influence policy transfer. Review of Policy Research 36(6), 657684.
Mitre, M. and Reis, B. P. W. (2015). Science and politics in the regulation of genetically modified organisms in Brazil. Review of Policy Research 31(2), 125147.
Morris, E. J. (1995). Biosafety regulations in South Africa. African Crop Science Journal 3(3), 303307.
Morris, E. J. (2011). A semi-quantitative approach to GMO risk–benefit analysis. Transgenic Research 20(5), 10551061.
Morris, E. J. and Thomson, J. A. (2014). Genetically modified crops commercialized in South Africa. In Biotechnology in Africa: Emergence, Initiatives and Future, ed. Wambugu, F. and Kamanga, D.. Basel: Springer International Publishing Switzerland, pp. 5365.
Racovita, M. et al. (2013). Experiences in sub-Saharan Africa with GM crop risk communication. GM Crops & Food 4(1), 1927.
Ramatha, L. and Andrew, J. (2012). Socio-economic aspects in decision-making in the context of the Biosafety Protocol: Malaysia's experience and case studies. Asian Biotechnology and Development Review 14(3), 1930.
Sayre, R. et al. (2011). The BioCassava Plus program: biofortification of cassava for sub-Saharan Africa. Annual Reviews of Plant Biology 62, 251272.
Siegrist, M. et al. (2016). Biased perception about gene technology: how perceived naturalness and affect distort benefit perception. Appetite 96, 509516.
Stein, A. J. et al. (2008). Genetic engineering for the poor: golden rice and public health in India. World Development 36(1), 144158.
The Montpellier Panel (2013). Sustainable Intensification: A New Paradigm for African Agriculture, London.
USDA (2015). Malaysia Agricultural Biotechnology Annual 2015. Global Agricultural Information Network (GAIN) Report Number MY5011. [Online]. Available from http://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Agricultural%20Biotechnology%20Annual_Kuala%20Lumpur_Malaysia_7-10-2015.pdf
Vigani, M. and Olper, A. (2013). GMO standards, endogenous policy and the market for information. Food Policy 43, 3243.
Vigani, M. and Olper, A. (2015). Patterns and determinants of GMO regulations: an overview of recent evidence. AgBioForum 18(1), 4454.
Wesseler, J. and Zilberman, D. (2014). The economic power of the Golden Rice opposition. Environment and Development Economics 19(6), 724742.
Wolt, J. D. et al. (2016). The regulatory status of genome-edited crops. Plant Biotechnology Journal 14(2), 510518.